In a message dated 9/6/2002 11:50:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: > I guess I'd better clarify how I feel. I'm plain of > two minds about these laws because I think they serve > a useful function as long as they are not themselves > used for witchhunts, which they only occasionally are. > > > The teenagers of teh Roswell program could bring > people back from the dead, heal the sick, repaint > rooms with their minds, make it snow, get into > peoples' minds, and predict the future, and one of > them solved a kidnapping by psychic visions. She was > interrogated to death by town officials and then the > FBI, and I think noone will deny it's a good thing she > could validly have taken the fifth amendment. > > We aren't talking about oigi boards adn dousing. The > youngsters tehmselves came to the conclusion that > healing people who have fatal illness or whose time it > is to die goes against the laws of nature. Human > nature is such that such powers can be used mostly > inappropriately, and I think having laws to kind of > keep such things a private matter are not a strictly > bad thing. > > Dora I would like to clarify that the "roswell" show is an entertainmnt, and not fact. Someone wrote those predetermined scenarios,and planned how the audience would react to the "situation', much political propaganda uses "scripted" incidences to achieve the same result. Jeffery G. Scism, IBSSG, (<A HREF="http://blacksheep.rootsweb.com">http://blacksheep.rootsweb.com</A>) ~~Genealogy is the art of the living haunting the dead.