I have the new version. Problem isn't how the dates are set in PAF nor how PAF is exporting the dates. Actually, the dates are exactly the way I want them. I am typing them in the way they appear in mnost sources and most published local records; 3 Mar 1636/1637. Apparently it is correct to put 1636-37 but that doesn't distinguish them from an uncertain date. I write them as Puritan dates to identify them as such. If I'm not sure about a date I say so. If I have several dates I put them, to let people know there is a range of dates that may be correct. The inability of FTM to deal with the 17th century dates is particularly idiotic. Dora --- [email protected] wrote: > In a message dated 9/16/02 7:44:47 AM Mountain > Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > > > Does anyone know of a genealogy program that > imports > > GEDCOM's from PAF > > Dora, which version of PAF do you have? the newer > 5.0 version has more > options than the 4.0 and earlier. It is also a free > download. > > I would advise you to play with PAF a little. Click > on the tabs at the top > and see what is in them. See what it will do before > you go to another > program. > > I have PAF along with Ancestral Quest. I'm happy > with both. Ancestral Quest > does some nice reports. I haven't put pictures in, > but I know that it will > do so. > > Aleta, IBSSG, Charter Member > Bo-Peep Award > > Ogden, Utah, USA > > "God sent his Singers upon the Earth, With songs of > Gladness and Mirth. That > they might touch the hearts of men, And bring them > to Heaven again." > --Longfellow > > > ==== BLACKSHEEP-CHAT Mailing List ==== > Unsubscribe from the list: > Mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion > online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com