On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:37:49 -0400, Geoffrey Wilson <glw4@psu.edu> wrote: >I am still using BK5g,, as did my late wife. Thus we were quite >limited in the amount of space we could use for locations. >Our ancestry is nearly all in England, so I used the Chapman County >Codes as abbreviations, which was common practice there. >New codes were added following the 1974 redistricting., and are >contained in BS 6879:1987.// There is a good commentary in >http://www.coxresearcher.com/definitions/admin.htm . > >For Canadian provnces I use the two-letter abbreviations used by Canada Poste. >For the USA I use the two-letter abbreviations of the US Postal Service. I did have over 1700 external text files I BK5 and there was also limits in Events and location and so son. So the version of BK6 and later all updates/upgrades has been large steps forwards both to making reports/books and also to connect pictures and sources and have proper link to web pages and so on. So return back to BK 5 is to return to start of our history and to forget all what is available of sources and information and new technology -- Otto Jørgensen http://www.bkwin.info/ All email is checked by NORTON