Amen. I'm always happy to see the bug fix updates and improvements on using its features, but I'm perfectly happy with the BK program as it functions now. I really don't need any more bells and whistles - just a reliable, well supported program that lets me conveniently sort out my ancestors and describe them. Bob Kirk At 10:40 PM 2/1/2012, R L Brown wrote: >Someone said that Jill was a bit too harsh with her comment. I >disagree. She echoed my thoughts exactly. > >I also have been a BK user since the DOS days, with even more names and >photos, and I'm a very satisfied customer. I've sampled many other >programs over the years, but none compares to BK for its reliability and >ease of use. Through all the platform and version upgrades, I've never >lost a single molecule of data. And the support is unparalleled. > >Several months ago someone else complained that BK was falling behind the >others due to its lack of bells and whistles and failure to adopt the >latest programming capabilities. I disagree with that also. What BK >lacks in fanciness and glitz, it makes up for by being a straightforward, >reliable user-friendly database. And that should be everyones top >priority. The periodic BK updates have consistently provided improvements >while retaining the program's underlying simplicity and integrity. I'm >always afraid, when there's a long period between updates, that JS is >about to unveil a new and improved BK that will rob it of the >characteristics that we all appreciate... or should. > >Rennie Brown >West Union, WV