I have been a BK user since the dos days. This program does everything I want or need it to do. You can't find another John Steed!! He is always there when I can't figure out how to do something. Unbeatable. Betty On 2/2/2012 8:49 PM, Robert Kirk wrote: > Amen. I'm always happy to see the bug fix updates and improvements on using > its features, but I'm perfectly happy with the BK program as it functions > now. I really don't need any more bells and whistles - just a reliable, > well supported program that lets me conveniently sort out my ancestors and > describe them. > > Bob Kirk > > > At 10:40 PM 2/1/2012, R L Brown wrote: >> Someone said that Jill was a bit too harsh with her comment. I >> disagree. She echoed my thoughts exactly. >> >> I also have been a BK user since the DOS days, with even more names and >> photos, and I'm a very satisfied customer. I've sampled many other >> programs over the years, but none compares to BK for its reliability and >> ease of use. Through all the platform and version upgrades, I've never >> lost a single molecule of data. And the support is unparalleled. >> >> Several months ago someone else complained that BK was falling behind the >> others due to its lack of bells and whistles and failure to adopt the >> latest programming capabilities. I disagree with that also. What BK >> lacks in fanciness and glitz, it makes up for by being a straightforward, >> reliable user-friendly database. And that should be everyones top >> priority. The periodic BK updates have consistently provided improvements >> while retaining the program's underlying simplicity and integrity. I'm >> always afraid, when there's a long period between updates, that JS is >> about to unveil a new and improved BK that will rob it of the >> characteristics that we all appreciate... or should. >> >> Rennie Brown >> West Union, WV > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to BK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >