In message <643dca$8taijl@outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out6.iinet.net.au>, Jill McGroder <gordonmc@netspace.net.au> writes: >John, >Leave Brothers Keeper alone, it works perfectly well, always best to be >sure you haven't got the same person mentioned half a dozen times (in >reality, so many names are duplicated). >( I am _not_ my own granddad ) ? are you sure about that, as it sounds >like you are confused. If you don't like it, BK as it is, well choose >another program. >I have been using Brothers Keeper since 1986, have over 53,000 names >and some 4,000 photos recorded, and it all works wonderfully. >Regards, >Jill [] I too have been using BK since DOS days (v4 I think); however, I don't think JS minds us pointing out oddities like the one I've mentioned. I agree, in fact I said it was a useful facility that it shows you other people of the same name: however, when you are entering a parent or child, it isn't going to be the same person! Many of the enhancements JS has put into BK _are_ the result of user requests. (Ability to use an external picture viewer, and show the embedded comments in pictures, are a couple he's added recently as a result of my requests, for example.) To turn your comment round, I could say if you like it as it is, never download an update (-: -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf ...Every morning is the dawn of a new error...

On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 08:40:52 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG@soft255.demon.co.uk> wrote: >To turn your comment round, I could say if you like it as it is, never >download an update (-: or in other word, do not use the new facilities, but take care of the fix that also are included in new upodate. -- Otto Jørgensen http://www.bkwin.info/ All email is checked by NORTON