In message <4FBC528863EB4D078DCA798B8F060A95@DYB>, David Bartelt <dybartelt@comcast.net> writes: >My library has archived newspaper clippings from the 1860s to about >1920s. If there are multiple references I will type the text as the >Actual Text in the source and reference the pertinent info for each >person. But if it is a fairly simple reference, many times I will just >reference the image of the newspaper clipping which I have copied and >named. > >The ability to bring up the image in your own picture editor is a nice >feature. [] I sort of see. I'm wondering what you're using an _image_ as a _source_ for: perhaps events. Personally in those cases I'd reference the source using text - the source system allows you to have, say, "The Times", and a field to enter the page (etc.) reference. I'd also, if I had an actual image of the relevant page, add that as an image/picture under the person/people referred to. But we all do things different ways, and I presume it was for those who do as you do that the facility to add an image as a source was added. I hadn't realised - since I've never used that - that that doesn't have the "view with external software" feature: I agree, it ought to be there if it isn't, and was probably an oversight when it was added to the main image viewing pane. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf ... current law enforcement approaches to stem the flow of drugs only manage to seize about one per cent of the drug imports... - Professor David Nutt (31 July-6 August 2010)