(Using BK7. Can't say which 7.x, because I'm in the edit screen, some way down a sequence of people which I don't want to lose.) This first one has already come up with "media" files - it applies to "picture" files too: If I have an image of the 1891 census as a wife, I classify it as a "family" image, because it shows hubby too; in 1901 she's a widow, so I have to make it an "individual" image (otherwise the dead husband's image list would include it even though he isn't on it). But I can't order the images 1891 before 1901. (I've asked if the word "family" in this context could be replaced by "couple", because to me "family" usually includes children, but I think there must be some reason this can't happen.) These latter examples are a different one: I'm looking at a man who had two wives (not both at once!). At first, BK shows wife #1, as one might expect. I select wife #2 from the drop-down list, so now I'm looking at husband, with wife #2 showing. I move to any other person - father, mother, or in particular, one of the children. I now click "<" to go back to the previous view. I sort of expect to see man with wife#2, which I don't. A particularly startling version of this I've just discovered: I'm looking at list of children of husband and wife#2, all with birth dates showing, and I see the child born first is listed last (since I've just added her). So I click Rearrange order, then Sort by birthdate. Poof - all gone! They haven't really, but I thought they had until I realised what had happened! -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)[email protected]+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf What is the world to a man when his wife is a widow? (think about it ...)