On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:42:24 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John) via" <[email protected]> wrote: >(Using BK7. Can't say which 7.x, because I'm in the edit screen, some >way down a sequence of people which I don't want to lose.) > >This first one has already come up with "media" files - it applies to >"picture" files too: That should be easy before or after the e-mail is printed and before the e-mail is posted >If I have an image of the 1891 census as a wife, I classify it as a >"family" image, because it shows hubby too; in 1901 she's a widow, so I >have to make it an "individual" image (otherwise the dead husband's >image list would include it even though he isn't on it). But I can't >order the images 1891 before 1901. (I've asked if the word "family" in >this context could be replaced by "couple", because to me "family" >usually includes children, but I think there must be some reason this >can't happen.) Many misunderstand "family" and do believe this is including children or grandparents. Yes, there are a problem with images in the way you describe An other problem is also if they have a child or some other fmily member and connect the same image to the 2third person" But I see the problem to refrech the screen, when you change wife, the imange at uper right should also refresh better. >These latter examples are a different one: I'm looking at a man who had >two wives (not both at once!). At first, BK shows wife #1, as one might >expect. I select wife #2 from the drop-down list, so now I'm looking at >husband, with wife #2 showing. I move to any other person - father, >mother, or in particular, one of the children. I now click "<" to go >back to the previous view. I sort of expect to see man with wife#2, >which I don't. yes, so is the situation :( >A particularly startling version of this I've just discovered: I'm >looking at list of children of husband and wife#2, all with birth dates >showing, and I see the child born first is listed last (since I've just >added her). So I click Rearrange order, then Sort by birthdate. Poof - >all gone! They haven't really, but I thought they had until I realised >what had happened! Re-index database ? -- Otto Jørgensen http://home.online.no/~otjoerge/ All email is checked by NIS2014