The LostCousins newsletter brought this family to my attention http://dailym.ai/1JyXUwx (warning: Daily Mail site). Could BK handle it (-:? -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)[email protected]+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf _IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS_ BEFORE ALL TECHNICAL INTERVENTION ON THE [CASE CUT THE ELECTRICAL FEEDING REGULAR MAINTENANCE PROVIDES THE GOOD WORKING OF A CASE (SEE INSTRUCTIONS BOOK) [seen on bacon cabinet in Tesco (a large grocery chain)]

On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:36:20 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John) via" <[email protected]> wrote: >The LostCousins newsletter brought this family to my attention >http://dailym.ai/1JyXUwx (warning: Daily Mail site). Could BK handle it >(-:? The question will be: Who is the mother and father Genetic Can be compared to adoption of the child to her sister and the sisters husband ? Surogatmother are not the genetic mother. I think BK can handle this. A miss in BK is that there are no differences in the way to handle adoptiv and biølogic children. My father in law had a cousin. The mother to the cousin died. The parent to my father in law adopted the child. And I have added the child to the program and marked it adoptiv and done the corect connection. That thild are now in two branches and children are in two branches and that is not in my opinion correct. We have to have a way to tell that the child is adopted and also to tell the program to differ in the presentatsion, both in reports and charts We have the Adoptive cousin treated as brother to my father and kaw and are treated as uncle to my wife, but sometimes we want to have separate alternatives. This as adopption of nearfamilymember is not unusual but BK does not handle that correct in chart and report. Anyway it is allrigth that we can add them and mark them, but miss the way to handle the branches in reports. -- Otto Jørgensen http://home.online.no/~otjoerge/ All email is checked by NIS2014