I just ran the Reasonableness Check on my database for the first time in a couple of years (my bad!! :-[ ). This is the first time I have run it under BK 7.0 and under Windows 7, but I'm not sure this matters. Most of the errors found are identifiable and fixable, but I have found two kinds that I cannot figure out what happened or what I did to cause them. In both cases, I have found quite a few instances of each kind of error. PERSON NAME age -1 years b. 12 Nov 1885 d. 7 Oct 1885 Situation: The correct birthdate and deathdate seem to have gotten reversed each under the wrong label. It happens virtually always in an entry for an childhood death. The second type comes in three different flavors. The entry is usually flagged because the person appears to have been married before they were born, married after they had died, or have a minus age (died before they were born). In all cases where I have the source document available, of the three dates, two of them are the SAME (one of which is correct, the other is not), and if the third date is present, it is nowhere to be found on or nearby the source record at all! Any ideas? Paul J. Lareau

To Maureen Farrell Here is a way to do what you want. You need to make a gedcom with only part of the source information and then read it back into a new data folder. 1. Be sure you have a current Backup of the database. 2. Write down, or else remember the name of your BK database (the folder name that shows at the bottom of the main BK screen directly above the number of names and families. 3. Pick File, Gedcom, Export and you can either pick all people, or selected and pick descendants of the person the report is for. Pick a name for the gedcom file. Then it will ask what information to export to the gedcom file. On that screen near the top pick Sources, and below that pick "Only export certain fields of the sources" 4. Then click OK to make the gedcom file. It will pop up a screen asking which parts of the sources to export. Check only the Title and the Page options. 5. Then open a new database with File, Open Database, Create. 6. After you have created the new database, pick File, Gedcom, Import and import the gedcom file that you made. The sources will only have the Title and Page numbers. 7. Then print your report from that database. 8. When you are finished, you can pick File, Open database, and open your normal database again. As for the problem with "endnotes with no duplicates" it will repeat a source if ANY part of it is different, including the page number. John Steed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maureen Farrell via" <[email protected]> To: "bk >> Brothers Keeper mailing list" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 3:02 PM Subject: [BK] simple report showing title of source and page >I am probably missing an option here, but is there a way to print a > descendant report > that shows simply the "source title" and page in footnotes, without > actual text, comments etc.? > Local historical society has a project collecting data on Irish families > in the county. > Although they do have in their files varying amounts of info submitted > by individuals, they > want to post only very basic data for families on their website. > I would like to be able to produce something that is only 5-6 pages for > 3 generations. > Since my database is pretty heavily sourced, BK is currently producing > 89 pages > when I try to make an RTF file, most of that is "actual text" plus many > duplicate > footnotes. (even though I have checked "end notes with no duplicates") > Thanks > Maureen Farrell. > (still running BK6.6.11) > Remember - Use the Archives at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message >

Maybe John can add an option like Quicken and append the date to the file name. jim -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Bradshaw via Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 1:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [BK] Backup files Hi John: When I create a backup file using BKbackup, in most cases a full backup including pictures, data and text I like to be able to label my backups as done on specific dates and the type of backup that's included in it. These backup files are written to one of three thumb drives each capable of holding two or three backups. I may have missed how to label internally on the backup what is contained in each one. Is there, somewhere, the ability to create labels internally at the time of backing up the files? I know if I choose to copy the files with a program external from the backup routine that you can name your backup but does BK offer something similar? Thanks, Dave Bradshaw Remember - Use the Archives at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hello all: I see now that I read Roy's message that what I guess is intuitive to others didn't register with me as to how label my backups. When I put my thumbdrive in it shows G, which I'm quite happy with. I was looking for it to ask me for a file name before it started to do the backup. I see now the box for folder which does the name and the backup. Sorry everyone sometimes it takes a kick in the rear to focus the eyes.. Dave

I am probably missing an option here, but is there a way to print a descendant report that shows simply the "source title" and page in footnotes, without actual text, comments etc.? Local historical society has a project collecting data on Irish families in the county. Although they do have in their files varying amounts of info submitted by individuals, they want to post only very basic data for families on their website. I would like to be able to produce something that is only 5-6 pages for 3 generations. Since my database is pretty heavily sourced, BK is currently producing 89 pages when I try to make an RTF file, most of that is "actual text" plus many duplicate footnotes. (even though I have checked "end notes with no duplicates") Thanks Maureen Farrell. (still running BK6.6.11)

Hi John: When I create a backup file using BKbackup, in most cases a full backup including pictures, data and text I like to be able to label my backups as done on specific dates and the type of backup that's included in it. These backup files are written to one of three thumb drives each capable of holding two or three backups. I may have missed how to label internally on the backup what is contained in each one. Is there, somewhere, the ability to create labels internally at the time of backing up the files? I know if I choose to copy the files with a program external from the backup routine that you can name your backup but does BK offer something similar? Thanks, Dave Bradshaw

Dave, From within BK we have the option to create a new folder for the back up files. I use this to date and label the type of backup by creating a new folder from the current date, such as: 20150130_full (or "_comp" for compressed) That is YYYYMMDD so that it sorts by date in Windows. You can also identify "pix" or "no-pix" either in the folder name or in a sub-folder. I like that we're no longer limited to the DOS naming convention of 8+3. Regards, Roy Marriott On 1/30/2015 12:32 PM, Dave Bradshaw via wrote: > Hi John: > When I create a backup file using BKbackup, in most cases a full backup > including pictures, data and text I like to be able to label my backups as > done on specific dates and the type of backup that's included in it. These > backup files are written to one of three thumb drives each capable of > holding two or three backups. I may have missed how to label internally on > the backup what is contained in each one. Is there, somewhere, the ability > to create labels internally at the time of backing up the files? I know if > I choose to copy the files with a program external from the backup routine > that you can name your backup but does BK offer something similar? > Thanks, > Dave Bradshaw > > Remember - Use the Archives athttp://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I'm using BK6 -- I create a new directory for the backup using the date as the name of the directory, such as 01302015. That way I can have several back ups on a thumb drive. Should I have a problem with the files, I have not overwritten good data. Not sure if this will take care of what you wish. Nan -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Bradshaw via Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 12:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [BK] Backup files Hi John: When I create a backup file using BKbackup, in most cases a full backup including pictures, data and text I like to be able to label my backups as done on specific dates and the type of backup that's included in it. These backup files are written to one of three thumb drives each capable of holding two or three backups. I may have missed how to label internally on the backup what is contained in each one. Is there, somewhere, the ability to create labels internally at the time of backing up the files? I know if I choose to copy the files with a program external from the backup routine that you can name your backup but does BK offer something similar? Thanks, Dave Bradshaw --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com

Jim, I do the same, but the question was, when somebody has different first names also in acts like Mozes and Max and so on. I need to know both names. It works perfect in BK . Max -----Original Message----- From: Jim Dell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 29 January 2015 21:59 To: 'Max van Dam'; [email protected]; 'John Montgomery' Subject: RE: [BK] Search Problems Max Sorry I reread your post and realize it's not about pictures. I have one name I have 24 of, but I set the option in BK to display by birth order so I really don't have much of a problem identify which one I am looking for. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Max van Dam [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:23 PM To: 'Jim Dell'; [email protected]; 'John Montgomery' Subject: RE: [BK] Search Problems Jim, I have no pictures in BK. That is for later. With my best regards, Max van Dam Rechovoth Israel http://www.maxvandam.info/ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Dell via Sent: 29 January 2015 15:38 To: John Montgomery; [email protected] Subject: Re: [BK] Search Problems How does your naming scheme work if you have multiple pictures of the same person taken at different times in their life? Jim Sent from my iPad > On Jan 29, 2015, at 5:23 AM, John Montgomery via <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > I have been using Brothers Keeper for many years now, since 1994 in > fact, and have used a naming system as shown below to identify the > actual name used for the person by inserting inverted commas. > > George Ernest "Basil" Bloggs > > If, however the person is known by some other name I have used > brackets eg > > George Ernest Basil (Joe) Bloggs. > > I find that when I search for a person these inserts seem to prevent > the specific people being shown. Is there a way of overcoming this problem. > > I am currently using BK6 but am considering moving to BK7, any advice. > > John Montgomery > Remember - Use the Archives at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message Remember - Use the Archives at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Jim, I have no pictures in BK. That is for later. With my best regards, Max van Dam Rechovoth Israel http://www.maxvandam.info/ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Dell via Sent: 29 January 2015 15:38 To: John Montgomery; [email protected] Subject: Re: [BK] Search Problems How does your naming scheme work if you have multiple pictures of the same person taken at different times in their life? Jim Sent from my iPad > On Jan 29, 2015, at 5:23 AM, John Montgomery via <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > I have been using Brothers Keeper for many years now, since 1994 in > fact, and have used a naming system as shown below to identify the > actual name used for the person by inserting inverted commas. > > George Ernest "Basil" Bloggs > > If, however the person is known by some other name I have used > brackets eg > > George Ernest Basil (Joe) Bloggs. > > I find that when I search for a person these inserts seem to prevent > the specific people being shown. Is there a way of overcoming this problem. > > I am currently using BK6 but am considering moving to BK7, any advice. > > John Montgomery > Remember - Use the Archives at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message Remember - Use the Archives at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I use in this kind cases to add an extra name under the tab "names" "as known as" in your case Joe Bloggs. With my best regards, Max van Dam Rechovoth Israel http://www.maxvandam.info/ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Montgomery via Sent: 29 January 2015 12:23 To: [email protected] Subject: [BK] Search Problems Hi Everyone, I have been using Brothers Keeper for many years now, since 1994 in fact, and have used a naming system as shown below to identify the actual name used for the person by inserting inverted commas. George Ernest "Basil" Bloggs If, however the person is known by some other name I have used brackets eg George Ernest Basil (Joe) Bloggs. I find that when I search for a person these inserts seem to prevent the specific people being shown. Is there a way of overcoming this problem. I am currently using BK6 but am considering moving to BK7, any advice. John Montgomery Remember - Use the Archives at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Max Sorry I reread your post and realize it's not about pictures. I have one name I have 24 of, but I set the option in BK to display by birth order so I really don't have much of a problem identify which one I am looking for. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Max van Dam [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:23 PM To: 'Jim Dell'; [email protected]; 'John Montgomery' Subject: RE: [BK] Search Problems Jim, I have no pictures in BK. That is for later. With my best regards, Max van Dam Rechovoth Israel http://www.maxvandam.info/ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Dell via Sent: 29 January 2015 15:38 To: John Montgomery; [email protected] Subject: Re: [BK] Search Problems How does your naming scheme work if you have multiple pictures of the same person taken at different times in their life? Jim Sent from my iPad > On Jan 29, 2015, at 5:23 AM, John Montgomery via <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > I have been using Brothers Keeper for many years now, since 1994 in > fact, and have used a naming system as shown below to identify the > actual name used for the person by inserting inverted commas. > > George Ernest "Basil" Bloggs > > If, however the person is known by some other name I have used > brackets eg > > George Ernest Basil (Joe) Bloggs. > > I find that when I search for a person these inserts seem to prevent > the specific people being shown. Is there a way of overcoming this problem. > > I am currently using BK6 but am considering moving to BK7, any advice. > > John Montgomery > Remember - Use the Archives at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message Remember - Use the Archives at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

John Montgomery   I use the same nameing scheme with no problem.   You have to add the "name" and the (name) under the Names Tab.   I select Type of name "Called" for "name".   I select Type of name "Nickname" for (name).   Then when I use the "Find" function I check the box for "also search alternate names". The search gets slower as more names are added.Regards, Jerry Rolow On Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:41 AM, Jim Dell via <[email protected]> wrote: How does your naming scheme work if you have multiple pictures of the same person taken at different times in their life? Jim Sent from my iPad > On Jan 29, 2015, at 5:23 AM, John Montgomery via <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > I have been using Brothers Keeper for many years now, since 1994 in fact, > and have used a naming system as shown below to identify the actual name > used for the person by inserting inverted commas. > > George Ernest "Basil" Bloggs > > If, however the person is known by some other name I have used brackets eg > > George Ernest Basil (Joe) Bloggs. > > I find that when I search for a person these inserts seem to prevent the > specific people being shown. Is there a way of overcoming this problem. > > I am currently using BK6 but am considering moving to BK7, any advice. > > John Montgomery > Remember - Use the Archives at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Remember - Use the Archives at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

To John Montgomery You should have no problem searching for those names. The only problem is if you use [ ] around a name, because that is a code meaning it is the last name of the person. That was used BK5 and also works in 6 and 7 but it is not needed in 6 or 7 because of the Last Name field on the Names tab. But " " or ( ) should be fine. The only possible problem is if you have changed the Options in BK 5 to use ( ) for last name instead of [ ] for last name. Please tell me what problems you are having searching for those people. If you search for George Bloggs It should find both of those people. If it does not find both of those people, let me know. To find a person by middle name, either enter an Alternate name or else go to List, Word Search. John Steed ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Montgomery via" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 5:23 AM Subject: [BK] Search Problems > Hi Everyone, > I have been using Brothers Keeper for many years now, since 1994 in fact, > and have used a naming system as shown below to identify the actual name > used for the person by inserting inverted commas. > > George Ernest "Basil" Bloggs > > If, however the person is known by some other name I have used brackets eg > > George Ernest Basil (Joe) Bloggs. > > I find that when I search for a person these inserts seem to prevent the > specific people being shown. Is there a way of overcoming this problem. > > I am currently using BK6 but am considering moving to BK7, any advice. > > John Montgomery > Remember - Use the Archives at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message >

Hi Everyone, I have been using Brothers Keeper for many years now, since 1994 in fact, and have used a naming system as shown below to identify the actual name used for the person by inserting inverted commas. George Ernest "Basil" Bloggs If, however the person is known by some other name I have used brackets eg George Ernest Basil (Joe) Bloggs. I find that when I search for a person these inserts seem to prevent the specific people being shown. Is there a way of overcoming this problem. I am currently using BK6 but am considering moving to BK7, any advice. John Montgomery

How does your naming scheme work if you have multiple pictures of the same person taken at different times in their life? Jim Sent from my iPad > On Jan 29, 2015, at 5:23 AM, John Montgomery via <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > I have been using Brothers Keeper for many years now, since 1994 in fact, > and have used a naming system as shown below to identify the actual name > used for the person by inserting inverted commas. > > George Ernest "Basil" Bloggs > > If, however the person is known by some other name I have used brackets eg > > George Ernest Basil (Joe) Bloggs. > > I find that when I search for a person these inserts seem to prevent the > specific people being shown. Is there a way of overcoming this problem. > > I am currently using BK6 but am considering moving to BK7, any advice. > > John Montgomery > Remember - Use the Archives at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

>From my archives of April 2002 Message text written by INTERNET:[email protected] > Can anyone tell me whether one can run BK5W ver 5.2G when the program and all the data files are on a ZIP disk, not on C:\ ? Is there significant interaction between the Win98 Registry and other parts with BK5W ? Thank you. Gunther Steinberg Portola Valley CA< --------------- It is possible to run from a CD or ZIP disk. There are two things to do Carefully EDIT the BKOPTION.DT5 file and find the PATH line and remove the drive letter from that line and add two spaces at the end of that line. That is because the CD drive or ZIP drive may be a different letter for the other user. So if it says E:\BK5 for the path on your computer change it to \BK5 and add two spaces at the end to make up for the removed E: That BKOPTON.DT5 files should be in the \BK5 directory on the ZIP or CD Then the user can make the CD or ZIP drive the default drive and start the program which is BK5W.EXE The other things that must be on the CD or ZIP disk are the .dll and vbx files that BK uses. So after you run BKSETUP to put the BK program on the CD or ZIP disk, you must also put these files in the same BK5 directory on the CD or ZIP disk. You can copy them from C:\Windows\System to that disk. THREED VBX 64,432 07-16-93 or 07-11-95 SSIDXTAB VBX 61,664 05-23-94 1:01a LEAD VBX 55,440 04-12-95 9:20a VSVIEW VBX 81,520 08-07-95 GRID VBX 45,136 06-15-93 5:26p GAUGE VBX 31,440 10-21-92 12:00a SPIN VBX 22,528 04-28-93 12:00a CMDIALOG VBX 18,688 04-28-93 12:00a QPLIST VBX 24,304 12-17-93 3:47p MLIST VBX 41,216 02-26-95 10:29a DWVSTAMP VBX 48,272 01-09-95 12:26a LEAD45 DLL 517,200 06-15-95 12:14p PORIENT DLL 10,384 07-14-93 4:33p WBTRCALL DLL 51,392 10-25-92 12:00a QPRO200 DLL 58,544 06-24-94 11:17a COMPPLUS DLL 118,144 03-14-97 VBRUN300 DLL 398,416 05-12-93 12:00a John Steed -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J. P. Gilliver (John) via Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 4:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BK] Dynamic Family Tree (DFT) by Michael Horey In message <[email protected]>, Jim Dell <[email protected]> writes: >I think BK5 was the last one that could run from CD. >Jim [] I thought I had - either in a private email or a saved post here - notes on how to overcome the "read only" nature of a database on CD; I think it might have been the inclusion of some dummy (or at least small) file. But I can't find it now )-:. [It wasn't from as recent as BK7, but I think it was during BK6's currency, rather than 5.] -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)[email protected]+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf ... he wants to have a porn filter. Which is all very well, but who's going to empty it? (Jeremy Harding, News Quiz 2013-7-26.) Remember - Use the Archives at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

In message <[email protected]>, Jim Dell <[email protected]> writes: >I think BK5 was the last one that could run from CD. >Jim [] I thought I had - either in a private email or a saved post here - notes on how to overcome the "read only" nature of a database on CD; I think it might have been the inclusion of some dummy (or at least small) file. But I can't find it now )-:. [It wasn't from as recent as BK7, but I think it was during BK6's currency, rather than 5.] -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)[email protected]+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf ... he wants to have a porn filter. Which is all very well, but who's going to empty it? (Jeremy Harding, News Quiz 2013-7-26.)

DFT is a handy utility to give others a graphical representation of family history without confusing the yet to be converted with mountains of data. There is virtually nothing the receivers of the information need to learn. If someone could write something similar, ideally avoiding the need for Java, it would be welcomed by those of us who mourn the loss of DFT. I used to employ DFT on my web sites until the Java security issues got in the way. Now I have some of my data at Tribalpages (whose lack of service is a worry to me at least) but viewing is not as simple for those new to family history. Java is a handy tool, but was/is open to exploitation by those intent on mischief and hence the continual stream of patches and rewrites. Keith Wellington, NZ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J. P. Gilliver (John) via Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2015 10:18 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BK] Dynamic Family Tree (DFT) by Michael Horey In message <[email protected]>, Jim Dell via <[email protected]> writes: >Do any of our UK BK users know how to contact Michael Horey the author >of Dynamic Family Tree? > >I use to create a GEDCOM from BK and input it to DFT and then put it on >CD to distribute to my relatives. But the program has problems with >the new versions of Java and browsers. [] OK, only for those with Windows, but I have always understood BK's facility to be told that the data is read-only implies that JS doesn't mind - in fact encourages - you to issue a CD with BK on it. (At least BK6; I haven't got to the point where I know whether 7 has the facility to work from read-only data, but I'd be surprised if it doesn't.) Obviously you don't give away your licence code. (I've never actually created a CD, since those relatives who share my interest in genealogy usually [a] already have data of their own [b] are interested in a slightly different set of ancestors and descendants. But I've always thinking of doing so, maybe to try to get someone into the hobby.) -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)[email protected]+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf "Look, if it'll help you to do what I tell you, baby, imagine that I've got a blaster ray in my hand." "Uh - you _have_ got a blaster ray in your hand." "So you shouldn't have to tax your imagination too hard." (Link episode) Remember - Use the Archives at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

With Otto's help I was able to set up a flash drive to run BK5 , but it required the use of a machine running a 32 bit version of Windows, and administrative privileges, so couldn't be used on most public machines such as those in the local library. At 09:02 AM 1/28/2015, Jim Dell via wrote: >I think BK5 was the last one that could run from CD. >Jim