Please disregard this comment in my previous message: >[I suspect the listing for Samuel in 1880 is >correct, and that the 1870 listing for female child "Sarah", age 10 in 1870, >is incorrect, and that this child is Samuel. Notice Asa is listed as a >female named "Asia" in 1870.] Sarah was 10 in 1860 - not 1870 - and thus born around 1850 rather than 1860, when Samuel was born. There's no reason to assume either census listing is incorrect.