RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [BRK] Berkshire Burial Index vs IGI
    2. Mr. Gaskell, Thank you for your prompt reply and the information. It is very much appreciated. I will read the information on the Oxfordshire Burial Index. Thank you for the address. Unfortunately, I do not know where the persons were living after their marriages. This is the reason I gave the dates and addresses for the christenings and marriages. Because both dates were in Berkshire I assumed, not the smartest thing to do, that the odds of them dying in Berkshire was a valid assumption. From the replies I received, lucky for me, the assumption in this case, was correct. They were found in Speenhandland, Boxford and South Hinksey. Two were not found, Paynton and Hes (sic). Hes can be spelled Hess, Heese, Hese etc. Warm personal regards, Jim WARD MS USA ----- Original Message ----- From: <PaulGask@aol.com> To: <Berkshire@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 3:51 PM Subject: Re: [BRK] Berkshire Burial Index vs IGI > > In a message dated 06/10/2009 16:12:30 GMT Daylight Time, > jimone2@telepak.net writes: > > Is there a Berkshire list member that has access to the Berkshire Burial > Index? > > >

    10/08/2009 02:44:43