unsubscribe BEALL-D-request@rootsweb.com wrote: > Subject: > > BEALL-D Digest Volume 98 : Issue 113 > > Today's Topics: > #1 [BEALL-L] BIEHL; PFA, BAY, DEU>Mon ["John D. von Bergen" <von.bergen.j] > #2 [BEALL-L] Re: BEALL-D Digest V98 # [SerenaNBD@aol.com] > #3 [BEALL-L] Re: BEALL-D Digest V98 # [TDHM26A@prodigy.com (MR JACKSON H ] > #4 [BEALL-L] IL Beall info [David Lewis <just_dave@earthlink.n] > > Administrivia: > To unsubscribe from BEALL-D, send a message to > > BEALL-D-request@rootsweb.com > > that contains in the body of the message the command > > unsubscribe > > and no other text. No subject line is necessary, but if your software > requires one, just use unsubscribe in the subject, too. > > ______________________________ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: [BEALL-L] BIEHL; PFA, BAY, DEU>Monroe Co., PA, 1789-1875 > Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 17:42:18 +0200 > From: "John D. von Bergen" <von.bergen.john@gtenet.com.eg> > To: BEALL-L@rootsweb.com > > Philomena Josephine Biehl (3GGM) *25 Dec 1789 Pfalz + 30 Jan 1875 Monroe > Co., PA oo c. 1816 Pfalz to Jacob Hoffecker *15 Feb 1788 Annweiler, > Pfalz + 22 Feb 1865 Monroe Co., PA. They lived in Smithfield Township > near East Stroudsburg, PA. > > Would appreciate any info on parents or place of birth. > Regards, > John D. von Bergen > > von.bergen.john@gtenet.com.eg > johnvb@aol.com > > ______________________________ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: [BEALL-L] Re: BEALL-D Digest V98 #112 > Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 19:15:56 EDT > From: SerenaNBD@aol.com > To: BEALL-L@rootsweb.com > > I'm writing this to Dale, because I seem to have lost your email address. You > sent me a file a long time ago and I"ve finally gotten the time to look at it. > You think that my Bales came from this line. I suspect you are right. > > Do you know anything about this Jacob? > > Children of SOLOMON BEALS and REBECCA UNDERWOOD are: > > ii. JACOB BEALS, b. 1777, of York Co., PA. > > Nancy--SerenaNBD@aol.com > > ______________________________ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: [BEALL-L] Re: BEALL-D Digest V98 #112 > Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 22:29:29, -0500 > From: TDHM26A@prodigy.com (MR JACKSON H DAY) > To: BEALL-L@rootsweb.com > > -- [ From: Jackson H. Day * EMC.Ver #3.1a INTERNATIONAL ] -- > > In response to David A. Lewis's note, I did a search in my DB for a > Josiah Beall born between 1780 and 1800, and a Robert Beall born after > 1800. My database consists only of Bealls tied somehow to Maryland, and > your Robert wasn't said to be of Maryland, so perhaps there is no > connection. Anyway, I didn't find one. However, I did find the > following note: > > B-THOM-112-7. Margaret Ferguson Beall, b. G1800 (FMMB 1778) of > Zephania [1728]; under 14 21 Apr 1811; court chooses mother as > guardian. 6 Feb 1822 living in Gallatain Co, Ill; appoint Robert > Beall of same county to receive from Eden Beall their share of > their father's estate. (MCW P:219; Heterick III:2) > > The above note tells me that Margaret Beall, daughter of Zephaniah, and > a great-great granddaughter of Robert Beall of Scotland (B-THOM), moved > to Illinois, and while there appointed a Robert Beall as agent. What > the note doesn't tell me is what relationship, if any, the Robert Beall > of Gallatain Co. Ill had to Margaret. Or whether this Robert Beall was > tied in some fashion to your Robert. > > If the dates are all correct, then your Robert, born 1812 in Indiana, > was aged 10 when Margaret appointed Robert of Illionois to receive some > property. Based on that, they're probably not the same person! > > Jack > > ______________________________ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: [BEALL-L] IL Beall info > Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 22:01:01 -0600 > From: David Lewis <just_dave@earthlink.net> > To: BEALL-L@rootsweb.com > > MR JACKSON H DAY wrote: > > > > -- [ From: Jackson H. Day * EMC.Ver #3.1a INTERNATIONAL ] -- > > > > In response to David A. Lewis's note, I did a search in my DB for a > > Josiah Beall born between 1780 and 1800, and a Robert Beall born after > > 1800. My database consists only of Bealls tied somehow to Maryland, and > > your Robert wasn't said to be of Maryland, so perhaps there is no > > connection. Anyway, I didn't find one. However, I did find the > > following note: > > > > B-THOM-112-7. Margaret Ferguson Beall, b. G1800 (FMMB 1778) of > > Zephania [1728]; under 14 21 Apr 1811; court chooses mother as > > guardian. 6 Feb 1822 living in Gallatain Co, Ill; appoint Robert > > Beall of same county to receive from Eden Beall their share of > > their father's estate. (MCW P:219; Heterick III:2) > > > > The above note tells me that Margaret Beall, daughter of Zephaniah, and > > a great-great granddaughter of Robert Beall of Scotland (B-THOM), moved > > to Illinois, and while there appointed a Robert Beall as agent. What > > the note doesn't tell me is what relationship, if any, the Robert Beall > > of Gallatain Co. Ill had to Margaret. Or whether this Robert Beall was > > tied in some fashion to your Robert. > > > > If the dates are all correct, then your Robert, born 1812 in Indiana, > > was aged 10 when Margaret appointed Robert of Illionois to receive some > > property. Based on that, they're probably not the same person! > > > > Jack > Hi Jack, > Thanks for your response. Robert Beall is a vey popular name. I believe > I have located my Robert Beall in Hancock Co IL in 1840 census record. > he is the only Beall listed in census index for that county so no help > there. He does have one additional adult male aged 20 to 30, one female > aged 10-15 and another male aged 10-15 living with him. They may be his > or his wifes family members. > If anyone is interested. There is also a Robert Beall in 1830 Morgan Co > IL census but he is 50-60 years of age and would be to old to be the > Robert you mention above. There are four other Beall families in 1830 > Morgan Co census: > Robert aged 50-60 00011001 00100001 > Thomas aged 30-40 100001 100001 > Richard aged 20-30 00011 210110001 > Arthur aged 20-30 20001 00001 > John aged 70-80 2011000001 011001