Thanks but that is not my boy. Thomas Henry Barra. wasn't born till 1854 in Barton on Humber Lincolnshire, thanks anyway. > This your boy? > BARRACLOUGH, Thomas > > Convict No 5730 > Ship Name Palmerston > Ship Arrival Date 11 Feb 1861 > > Birth Date 1835 > > Deceased 25 Feb 1866 > Place of Death accidentally killed > Marital Status Mar 2 chn > Occupation collier > Literacy illit > Religion C/E > > Sentence Place York > Sentence Province York > Sentence Country England > Court Assizes > Length of Sentence 20yrs > Crime robbery with violence > > Ticket of Leave Date 4 Jul 1863 > > > > > > > > Known Areas Perth, Champion Bay > > > > > > Comments Labourer, miner > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Sutcliffe" <jeff.sutcliffe@btinternet.com> > To: <BARRACLOUGH-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 6:49 PM > Subject: [BARRACLOUGH] RE: Thomas BARRACLOUGH--Clayton West > > > > Greetings Derek, > > > > I seem to be getting that feeing of de ja vue. > > The first Thomas I found did seem to fit the bill best. > > Have you tried a bit of lateral thinking? It could be that Thomas > was > > recorded in two places in 1851. If he was living in Bradford but on > the > > census night he was visiting relatives back in Clayton West (or > vice > > versa). > > Was your Thomas a Joiner or some other trade that a joiner might > turn to? > > Have you checked with the 1861 Census for Clayton West? If he was > still in > > Clayton West in 1861, then my hypothesis is wrong. If he wasn't, > then > > where > > was he. > > The reason why I write again is that there were so few Barraclough > > > families > > in the Denby area. Only two? Both families contained Thomas's of a > similar > > age. Coincidence or cousins perhaps? Was there a third. > > Obviously it's possible. He may have been on the 1841 Census and I > missed > > him, or he may have been overlooked. The Census was not complete. > > As for third time lucky? Sorry, but I would have to spread the net > too far > > and I don't have any indexes to the 1841 Census. > > Good luck. > > > > Jeff Sutcliffe > > http://www.btinternet.com/~jeff.sutcliffe > > Researching Ambler, Baker, Barraclough, Bates, Booth, Broadbent, > Brook, > > Brown, Chadwick, Collins, Coning, Crowther, Fearnley, Hanson, > Hardcastle, > > Hartas, Harwood, Holmes, Metcalf, Nowell, Oliver, Pennington, > Pollard, > > Radcliffe, Roebuck, Routh, Smith, Sugden, Sutcliffe, Tordoff, > Ventress, > > Walker, Whitaker, Whiteley, Wilkinson, Wilson All of the Yorkshire > Area. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Derek ofShelf [mailto:DerekofShelf1@activemail.co.uk] > > Sent: 01 December 2005 17:25 > > To: jeff.sutcliffe@btinternet.com > > Subject: Thomas BARRACLOUGH--Clayton West > > > > Greetings---again,Jeff, > > Oh dear ! Sorry,Jeff,that Thomas was also still back in High > Hoyland with > > wife and a few more little sprogs on the 1851 census. > > Third time lucky ? > > Thanks for all your endeavour------Derek. > > > > > > > > ==== BARRACLOUGH Mailing List ==== > > For a list of other Rootsweb Mailing Lists world-wide: > > http://lists.rootsweb.com/ > > > > > > > > ==== BARRACLOUGH Mailing List ==== > Would you like to record a Barraclough Biography? > Check out "Biographies" at > http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~surreal/barraclough/index.html > > >