I see......I didn't realize that those families were not done. I forget sometimes that my Barlow's aren't the only Barlow family that can't be placed.......need to get out of my own genealogical world more often I think! Thanks for the no brainer! Kim >From: "Susan BARLOW Holmes" <sbarlowholmes@classicnet.net> >Reply-To: BARLOW-L@rootsweb.com >To: BARLOW-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: RE: [BARLOW] DNA testing >Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:32:34 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com ([66.43.18.41]) by mc4-f26.hotmail.com >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:33:21 -0700 >Received: (from slist@localhost)by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id >j88GWjrg031660;Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:32:45 -0600 >X-Message-Info: vAu4ZEtdRihZdT9zAxn19seyW6PNs/QEmeiASAdfDUc= >Resent-Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:32:45 -0600 >X-Original-Sender: sbarlowholmes@classicnet.net Thu Sep 8 10:32:44 2005 >Old-To: <BARLOW-L@rootsweb.com> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 >X-broadbandsupportnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for >more information >X-broadbandsupportnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean >X-broadbandsupportnet-MailScanner-From: sbarlowholmes@classicnet.net >X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.16.34 >Resent-Message-ID: <oR2GvB.A.CuH.teGIDB@lists5.rootsweb.com> >Resent-From: BARLOW-L@rootsweb.com >X-Mailing-List: <BARLOW-L@rootsweb.com> archive/latest/3545 >X-Loop: BARLOW-L@rootsweb.com >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: BARLOW-L-request@rootsweb.com >Return-Path: BARLOW-L-request@rootsweb.com >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2005 16:33:21.0483 (UTC) >FILETIME=[06A891B0:01C5B493] > >For comparison sake. We have no DNA test results from those families. >We can't tell if John of Fairfield is related to those families, >etc..until we get a result. > >We need results from every known line to compare those who have no clue >what line they are in. We have a new result right now, no match to >anything we have currently in our database, so he still doesn't know >what line he is from. Should he be from Edmund of Malden, or one of the >groups that we have no results for, then he still doesn't know what line >he is from. Also. To see if any of our major lines are related, closer >than we know. For instance, a DNA result from another database suggests >that John of Fairfield is related to Edmund of Malden, but I have not >seen the results for myself yet to know if that is correct, or how close >the relationship is, whether it is an exact match, or 36 out of 37 >markers, or even perhaps only 34 out of 37, which is a great distance. >As you know, we are all related at some point or other. > >Are you sufficiently confused yet? > >Love, Susan > > > >Looking for Barlows, anywhere....anytime, including all variants and >spellings of the name, Barlo, Barloe, Barlowe, Parlar, Barler, Barlar, >Barlage, etc... > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Kimberly Granholm [mailto:kimberlyg1972@hotmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 10:41 AM >To: BARLOW-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: RE: [BARLOW] DNA testing > >Susan > >Very generous offer from annonymous! > >Question though? If the persons line has already been traced/proven >to >one of the families you listed, why test? I know that if i could >connect my >Nathaniel Barlow to ANY of the Barlow lines DNA testing wouldnt be >needed.........at the same time DNA testing takes some of the fun out of >it >;) > >Not jelous, just curious! > >Kim > > > > > > > >From: "Susan BARLOW Holmes" <sbarlowholmes@classicnet.net> >Reply-To: BARLOW-L@rootsweb.com >To: BARLOW-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: [BARLOW] DNA testing >Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 17:02:57 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com ([66.43.18.41]) by >mc3-f31.hotmail.com >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:06:43 -0700 >Received: (from slist@localhost)by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) >id >j87M384V026009;Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:03:08 -0600 > >I have had a very generous offer from an anonymous donor willing to pay > >for a complete 37 marker DNA test for anyone that can has traced their > >genealogy back to any one of the following families. > > > >If we have a volunteer, remember first it has to be a male, with the > >Barlow surname, and your name can be completely anonymous, except to > >myself, as the administrator of the DNA project, and perhaps to the > >person donating the funds.(I have not asked their opinion of that) we > >would need to know your ancestral genealogy, for comparison with > >others currently online. > > > >1rst choice would be a male Barlow from either of these lines: > > > >http://www.barlowgenealogy.com/Families/MormonFamilies/Oswald.html > > > >http://www.barlowgenealogy.com/Families/MormonFamilies/Barlow-Hulme.htm >l > > > >However, I would look favorably on someone who wanted to test from one > >these family lines: > > > >Israel Barlow - earliest ancestor Francis Barlow of Turton, Lancashire > >b1512 > >Ebenezer Barlow - earliest ancestor Robert Barlow of St Leonards, > >Shoreditch, London b1808 > >William Francis Barlow - earliest ancestor George W. Barlow of Cairo, > >New York b1832 > > > >Please contact me at: sbarlowholmes@classicnet.net > > > >Susan > > > > > > > >Looking for Barlows, anywhere....anytime, including all variants and > >spellings of the name, Barlo, Barloe, Barlowe, Parlar, Barler, Barlar, > >Barlage, etc... > > > > > > > >==== BARLOW Mailing List ==== > >To UNSUBSCRIBE from the BARLOW Mailing List: > > > >If subscribed to BARLOW-L, send an email to: > >barlow-l-request@rootsweb.com > > > >Type "unsubscribe" in the Subject line. (Without the quotes, of >course.) > > > > > >If subscribed to BARLOW-D, send an email to: > >BARLOW-d-request@rootsweb.com > > > >Type "unsubscribe" in the Subject line. (Without the quotes, of >course.) > > > > > >==== BARLOW Mailing List ==== >To UNSUBSCRIBE from the BARLOW Mailing List: > >If subscribed to BARLOW-L, send an email to: >barlow-l-request@rootsweb.com > >Type "unsubscribe" in the Subject line. (Without the quotes, of >course.) > > >If subscribed to BARLOW-D, send an email to: >BARLOW-d-request@rootsweb.com > >Type "unsubscribe" in the Subject line. (Without the quotes, of >course.) > > >==== BARLOW Mailing List ==== >To UNSUBSCRIBE from the BARLOW Mailing List: > >If subscribed to BARLOW-L, send an email to: >barlow-l-request@rootsweb.com > >Type "unsubscribe" in the Subject line. (Without the quotes, of course.) > > >If subscribed to BARLOW-D, send an email to: >BARLOW-d-request@rootsweb.com > >Type "unsubscribe" in the Subject line. (Without the quotes, of course.) >