Elaine Funny thing is that FamilySearch.org also has an Agnes Wylie (one L) born either 10/7/1766 at Riccarton OR 10/7/1776 at Riccarton with the parents listed as William Wylie and Elizabeth Raeburn. Entry was submitted by a member of the LDS Church and sometimes these entries are not very accurate - but many times they are. The problem with Scotland's people as I have found through my own research is that if you don't put in the exact spelling for the record you don't get a return. For example when I was researching my BROWN ancestors in the parish of Sorn - yeah I did find some of them with the spelling BROWN must missed out on the earlier ones that were spelled BROUN, BROWNE, BROUNE!! Until that is somebody told me about using wildcards. For example if you were to input WYL* (don't forget the asterisk) Then again your Elizabeth Ryburn may have been spelled Raeburn. One of my ancestors had a few kids in the parish of Galston and then they went to Kilmarnock and I expect a similar thing happened to your Wyllies/Wylies. Often back then people couldn't read or write and so the spelling of the name was left up to how the Church Officer of the Kirk spelled it. In two different parishes the name could be spelled differently. In fact in the SAME recording of one of my Brown ancestors the name was spelled BROUN and then BROUNE! Here's a trick for young players on Scotland's People. Try this: In surname put WYL* First name Leave blank Parent: William Wyl* Parent: Elizabeth R If that doesn't work then do the same but substitute Elizabeth R for Elisabeth R Don't choose a parish On the occasions I've got right it then brings up ALL the children of the parents that fit the input. Good Luck! Ken Brown