If you want to add one more consideration to the debate, it has become evident that besides both company's "predicted/suggested" 3rd and 4th cousins being more distant and that most people should give greater consideration to the range of relationships suggested, it is also clear that FTDNA's algorithm is less accurate when applied to 2nd-3rd cousin range relationships with it placing greater emphasis on the largest segment than on total share of segments over 5 cM (23andMe's methodology). I have several examples where FTDNA is actually suggesting a more distant relationship than actual due to comparatively smaller largest segments resulting from primarily female meiotic events separating two individuals who would be predicted accurately using the total cM for segments over 5 cM methodology. And I have had a few "unknown" 2nd-3rd cousins appear in results for my several accounts with both companies.