I see, thank you, Ann, even though you're telling me it's not possible to do what I'd hoped. ;-) I guess it doesn't really surprise me too much. What I am looking for is Hg I* and I1* men who had possibly tested at 23andMe, but not FTDNA, where I could read results for some of the phyloequivalent SNPs that people typically don't test a la carte and that aren't usually included in a deep clade test at FTDNA. IOW, at FTDNA, if someone tests M253+ or M170+/M253-, there would usually be no reason to test anything else that isn't known to be downstream. To be more specific, I'd like to see if everyone who is M170+/M253- or M253+ is also L840+ (plus other allegedly M253 phyloequivalent SNPs). They are said to be equivalent, and I don't have any reason to doubt the person saying it, but if I'm going to site that as a proven fact on my web site, I would like to see the data for myself. If that kind of hunt is not possible, then I need to try some other avenue. Am I correct in understanding that, essentially, the only way to get that information is if the test subject gives it to you? Which means you have to somehow know whom to ask. Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:autosomal-dna- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ann Turner > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:07 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AUTOSOMAL-DNA] extracting Y-DNA SNPs from 23andMe > > No, you wouldn't be able to look at the SNP status of all I1 men in > the > 23andMe database. > > If you don't have any access to a male's account, you can add the > demo > "Mendel" family at Account | Settings | Example Profiles. Then you > can > Browse Raw Data for the SNP and see Greg Mendel's results. He's > currently > classified as I1*. > > If you're talking about an "obscure" SNP that's not currently used > by > 23andMe or ISOGG to define a subclade, you can start a Community > Thread on > the topic and ask what people are finding. In fact, I have a vague > recollection about just such a thread, so Search the website for the > SNP > and see if it's under discussion. > > Ann