RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. [AUTOSOMAL-DNA] Short segments, Small SNP
    2. Hello, I am wondering if there is any advantage to not deleting the short segments and small SNPs from your spreadsheet and instead hiding them so they are not visible. Ann G.

    09/27/2013 12:35:57
    1. Re: [AUTOSOMAL-DNA] Short segments, Small SNP
    2. Tim Janzen
    3. Dear Ann, I presume that you are referring to FTDNA Family Finder data in your message below since FTDNA provides matching HIR data for HIRs as short as 1 cM. What I have done in my master spreadsheets is to delete all HIRs less than 3.5 cMs from the spreadsheets. I keep the other data (the HIR data for HIRs between 1 and 3.5 cMs) in the original file I downloaded from DNAGEDCOM for reference if I need it. I think that 3.5 cMs is a reasonable "sweet spot" in this regard. A relatively low percentage of HIRs less than 3.5 cMs in length will be IBD. There will still be quite a few HIRs that are longer than 3.5 cMs that are IBS, but I prefer to err on the side of keeping some HIRs in my master spreadsheet that are IBS rather than deleting some HIRs that are IBD. In any case, I definitely wouldn't set your threshold any higher than 7 cMs for Family Finder data. I use the same threshold for GEDmatch data, which is primarily a reflection of Ancestry.com data that I don't already have from Family Finder or 23andMe. Sincerely, Tim Janzen -----Original Message----- From: autosomal-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:autosomal-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of AGilchrest@aol.com Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 3:36 PM To: autosomal-dna@rootsweb.com Subject: [AUTOSOMAL-DNA] Short segments, Small SNP Hello, I am wondering if there is any advantage to not deleting the short segments and small SNPs from your spreadsheet and instead hiding them so they are not visible. Ann G.

    09/27/2013 04:56:45