1)In my Wiliam_Daugherty FTDNA FF Project, in addition to autosomal data, I have been comparing yDNA information. Based on yDNA tests of five descendants of three of William's sons, and pending autosomal DNA confirmation, I think that I have a good idea at the 60 marker level what William Daugherty's yDNA was. When all test results become available over the next couple of months I expect that we will be out to 67 markers. We have a very solid paper trail as well. The derivation process involves a 2 out of three or better yDNA marker match to be accepted as the Patriarch's derived yDNA. I think that this derived information can be broadly useful and would like to find some way of adding these sort of results to the FTDNA database. Perhaps a moderate fee to FTDNA for evaluation of our research would be appropriate as well as appropriate disclaimers on the derived yDNA result. 2)Over the next several months to a year, I may have constructed as many as three separate "pseudo-autosomal DNA test results" for three different people. I am interested in refining these "pseudo results against" real results in various databases with out skewing real database results. I would like to see some way of doing this at FTDNA, GEDmatch and perhaps as Ancestry.com as well. Please let me know your thoughts Sam Eaton