I had one relative who left his wife, changed his name, got remarried and died in a mining accident. There should be an inquest if they died like that. Wendy T ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dawn Webb" <dawnwebb@optushome.com.au> To: <AUSSIE-GEN-RESEARCH-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:13 PM Subject: RE: [A.G.R. ] Inquest record at PROV > <<<I love the unusual and apparent contradictions, and particularly if I > can learn > something that may be useful for others doing research. I love to drop > little gems and examples into my guest speaker talks,... >>>>> > > Indeed you do - I thoroughly enjoyed your talk last night at Blackburn. > > I may have to ask for your help in a couple of years when I have > exhausted all avenues I can find for finding gg grandpa who seems at the > moment to be about 175 years old and still going strong. My feeling is > he eother died in a mining accident (checked the lists, not there)or > more likely vanished -with some other woman maybe - and that fact > brought on early labour as the last child was prem and died just one day > old. Dad was NOT the informant on either that last ubirth or death > which was unusal for that family. 5 years later gg gran dies in > Melbourne hospital (they were at Daylesford 5 years ealier) and the > death cert is all unknown even as to the married and children fields - > just native of Cambridgeshire, almost correct age and length of time in > colony, and the name. Died of cancer of womb and ovaries, poor lady - I > nearly cried when I got her death cert. > > Dawn > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ada Ackerly [mailto:aackers@alphalink.com.au] > Sent: Thursday, 9 October 2003 1:37 PM > To: AUSSIE-GEN-RESEARCH-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [A.G.R. ] Inquest record at PROV > > > Hello Jenny, > > Since there is no charge, if it was me, I'd order both, solve the > problem, > then put up my findings to the list. > > It is unusual to have two inquests on the same person, but it is > possible, with an exhumation and re-discovery of some evidence (e.g. > poison) not tested in the original inquest. However, it is most unusual. > > The first surmise is that there are two people involved. > > Now, I hope you will look into this and put me out of my misery... I > love > the unusual and apparent contradictions, and particularly if I can learn > > something that may be useful for others doing research. I love to drop > little gems and examples into my guest speaker talks, and they help > other > people who might never have thought that "the different" was possible. > > Thanks in anticipation, > Regards Ada > > > At 20:13 08-10-03 +1000, Jenny Gray wrote: > >Hi List, > > > >Just ordering some records online to view at PROV and have come across > >two records with the same Title/Description number, the one I want is > >VPRS28/POO20/323, but am wondering if I should also order the other > >(listed below). Been a long time since I have been to PROV and can't > >remember how their indexing works, I'm wondering if both records relate > > >to the same person? > > > >ITEM VPRS28/P0020/323 1023/714 No Date No Date > >ITEM VPRS28/P0020/98 1023/714 No Date No Date > > > >Jenny > > > > > > > >==== AUSSIE-GEN-RESEARCH Mailing List ==== > >Have you visited AUSSIE-GEN-RESEARCH Web site yet? > >Please do? And do sign our visitors book? > >http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~ausgenres/ > >*********************************************************************** > >* > >Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > >*********************************************************************** > * > >Searchable Archives at > >http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=AUS-GEN-RES > EARCH-L > > > >============================== > >To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy > >records, > >go to: > >http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > > regards, > Ada Ackerly, Melbourne, Australia > formerly Ackerly DocuSearch > > > > > ==== AUSSIE-GEN-RESEARCH Mailing List ==== > ************************************************************************ > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List!<--------- OFF Topic ----- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Hey have you updated your AntiVirus program lately ? ? > Is your AV continuously activated while online ? ? > Does your AV continue to check each and every email as it is down loaded > ? ? Does your AV continue to check every Website you inter into ? ? > Better to be safe than sorry . . . let HouseCall check out your system > FREE ! http://housecall.antivirus.com/. other sites you might want to > check out . . . > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~clifflamere/Aid/AID-VirusProtec > t.htm > -this one mentioned in Missing Links Vol. 5 No. 44 > http://antivirus.cai.com/ > - this one was mentioned on the Listowner List > http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_index.cfm > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy > records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > > > ==== AUSSIE-GEN-RESEARCH Mailing List ==== > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=AUSSIE-GEN-RESEARCH-L > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > >