Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Home

Results for list 'aus-vic-high-country'

Total: 5/5
    1. Re: [HC] OMA
    2. Denise

    3. I have run thru the OMA until 15th June and have not found any results to the Challenge Irene. Maybe later in the papers. Kerry - there's been nothing to indicate who took over the British Hotel, maybe at the end of the year and license time will reveal! Denise ----- Original Message ----- From: "Irene R" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:08 PM Subject: Re: [HC] OMA > Thanks very much Denise. What a funny bunch. Talk about prickly pride. As > you say, there must have been no election just then. Had to fill the paper > with something I suppose > > Regards > > Irene R > > Rees/Dowsett Family Page > > http://tribalpages.com/tribes/Brent44 > > -------Original Message------- > > From: Denise > Date: 09/29/05 14:23:04 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [HC] OMA > > Irene. > > I posted more than one about the Challenge of Rath and the other but there > is only one in the archives. > I'm sending it thru again, luckily I haven't cleared out my Sent Box since > then. > > Denise > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Denise" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:19 AM > Subject: Re: [HC] OMA > > >> Irene hi >> I didn't see the results printed, but I'll scan back over it later for >> you >> to see if I missed. The papers suddenly became full of a couple of deaths >> of major players in Beechworth and the election of Mining Board - all >> else >> goes out the window when an election is on. >> >> D >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Irene R" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:17 AM >> Subject: Re: [HC] OMA >> >> >>> Hi Denise >>> >>> Many thanks. I ould love to have been able to watch all this RATH from >>> afar. >>> I think it would have been a hott - never a dull moment! >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Irene R >>> >>> Rees/Dowsett Family Page >>> >>> http://tribalpages.com/tribes/Brent44 >>> >>> -------Original Message------- >>> >>> From: Denise >>> Date: 09/28/05 23:20:32 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [HC] OMA >>> >>> 1.6.1861 I think these people paid to have their name in the paper on a >>> regular basis! >>> >>> RATH >>> >>> in court, Police Court 30/5/61 >>> Rath v Mills, Mills v Rath and Same v Same. >>> Young for Rath. Zincke for Mills >>> Mills older of a claim through which a track or roadway passes to 3 >>> Mile. >>> Rath was a farmer and for years had been in habit of using this road. >>> Last Monday Mills thought proper to tear up slabs forming a bridge in >>> part >>> of this roadway and asRath was passing in to B/worth he and Mills had >>> high >>> words and Mills was alleged to have struck Rath's horse with a pick. >>> The evidence for the defence was a direct contradiction of the evidence >>> for >>> the complainant (isn't this normal?). Rath and his son swore Mills was >>> drunk >>> >>> Mills and two Chinamen said he was sober. >>> Same with nearly every circumstance alleged to have taken place. >>> One alleged that the other had called very ugly names while the person >>> charged exclaimed 'he wouldn't do so'. Bench obviously got sick of the >>> whole >>> deal, dismissed the case and made each party pay his own costs. >>> - >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/113 - Release Date: 9/27/05 >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/113 - Release Date: 9/27/05 > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/114 - Release Date: 9/28/05 > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/114 - Release Date: 9/28/05

    09/29/2005 10:10:13
    1. Hunt's British Hotel
    2. Denise

    3. Ah ha! In my list of publicans supplied to me years ago by someone who researched various licenses etc I have June 1861 Hunt's British Hotel at 3 Mile Creek - John Anderson district publican. Then to confuse at Bowman's Forest Hunt's British Hotel June 1861 was William Wells. As I cannot explain this, I'm ducking for cover. Maybe Hunt originally had several hotels? Denise ----- Original Message ----- From: "Denise" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:10 PM Subject: Re: [HC] OMA >I have run thru the OMA until 15th June and have not found any results to >the Challenge Irene. Maybe later in the papers. > > Kerry - there's been nothing to indicate who took over the British Hotel, > maybe at the end of the year and license time will reveal! > > Denise > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Irene R" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:08 PM > Subject: Re: [HC] OMA > > >> Thanks very much Denise. What a funny bunch. Talk about prickly pride. As >> you say, there must have been no election just then. Had to fill the >> paper >> with something I suppose >> >> Regards >> >> Irene R >> >> Rees/Dowsett Family Page >> >> http://tribalpages.com/tribes/Brent44 >> >> -------Original Message------- >> >> From: Denise >> Date: 09/29/05 14:23:04 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [HC] OMA >> >> Irene. >> >> I posted more than one about the Challenge of Rath and the other but >> there >> is only one in the archives. >> I'm sending it thru again, luckily I haven't cleared out my Sent Box >> since >> then. >> >> Denise >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Denise" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:19 AM >> Subject: Re: [HC] OMA >> >> >>> Irene hi >>> I didn't see the results printed, but I'll scan back over it later for >>> you >>> to see if I missed. The papers suddenly became full of a couple of >>> deaths >>> of major players in Beechworth and the election of Mining Board - all >>> else >>> goes out the window when an election is on. >>> >>> D >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Irene R" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:17 AM >>> Subject: Re: [HC] OMA >>> >>> >>>> Hi Denise >>>> >>>> Many thanks. I ould love to have been able to watch all this RATH from >>>> afar. >>>> I think it would have been a hott - never a dull moment! >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Irene R >>>> >>>> Rees/Dowsett Family Page >>>> >>>> http://tribalpages.com/tribes/Brent44 >>>> >>>> -------Original Message------- >>>> >>>> From: Denise >>>> Date: 09/28/05 23:20:32 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [HC] OMA >>>> >>>> 1.6.1861 I think these people paid to have their name in the paper on a >>>> regular basis! >>>> >>>> RATH >>>> >>>> in court, Police Court 30/5/61 >>>> Rath v Mills, Mills v Rath and Same v Same. >>>> Young for Rath. Zincke for Mills >>>> Mills older of a claim through which a track or roadway passes to 3 >>>> Mile. >>>> Rath was a farmer and for years had been in habit of using this road. >>>> Last Monday Mills thought proper to tear up slabs forming a bridge in >>>> part >>>> of this roadway and asRath was passing in to B/worth he and Mills had >>>> high >>>> words and Mills was alleged to have struck Rath's horse with a pick. >>>> The evidence for the defence was a direct contradiction of the evidence >>>> for >>>> the complainant (isn't this normal?). Rath and his son swore Mills was >>>> drunk >>>> >>>> Mills and two Chinamen said he was sober. >>>> Same with nearly every circumstance alleged to have taken place. >>>> One alleged that the other had called very ugly names while the person >>>> charged exclaimed 'he wouldn't do so'. Bench obviously got sick of the >>>> whole >>>> deal, dismissed the case and made each party pay his own costs. >>>> - >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>>> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/113 - Release Date: 9/27/05 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>>> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/113 - Release Date: 9/27/05 >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/114 - Release Date: 9/28/05 >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/114 - Release Date: 9/28/05

    09/29/2005 10:17:32
    1. RE: [HC] Hunt's British Hotel
    2. Anne Hanson

    3. Hi Denise, Just wondering if your list of publicans covers further than N.E. Victoria. Could you get back to me off list please? Cheers Anne Hanson -----Original Message----- From: Denise [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 29 September 2005 4:18 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [HC] Hunt's British Hotel Ah ha! In my list of publicans supplied to me years ago by someone who researched various licenses etc I have June 1861 Hunt's British Hotel at 3 Mile Creek - John Anderson district publican. Then to confuse at Bowman's Forest Hunt's British Hotel June 1861 was William Wells. As I cannot explain this, I'm ducking for cover. Maybe Hunt originally had several hotels? Denise ----- Original Message ----- From: "Denise" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:10 PM Subject: Re: [HC] OMA >I have run thru the OMA until 15th June and have not found any results to >the Challenge Irene. Maybe later in the papers. > > Kerry - there's been nothing to indicate who took over the British Hotel, > maybe at the end of the year and license time will reveal! > > Denise > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Irene R" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:08 PM > Subject: Re: [HC] OMA > > >> Thanks very much Denise. What a funny bunch. Talk about prickly pride. As >> you say, there must have been no election just then. Had to fill the >> paper >> with something I suppose >> >> Regards >> >> Irene R >> >> Rees/Dowsett Family Page >> >> http://tribalpages.com/tribes/Brent44 >> >> -------Original Message------- >> >> From: Denise >> Date: 09/29/05 14:23:04 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [HC] OMA >> >> Irene. >> >> I posted more than one about the Challenge of Rath and the other but >> there >> is only one in the archives. >> I'm sending it thru again, luckily I haven't cleared out my Sent Box >> since >> then. >> >> Denise >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Denise" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:19 AM >> Subject: Re: [HC] OMA >> >> >>> Irene hi >>> I didn't see the results printed, but I'll scan back over it later for >>> you >>> to see if I missed. The papers suddenly became full of a couple of >>> deaths >>> of major players in Beechworth and the election of Mining Board - all >>> else >>> goes out the window when an election is on. >>> >>> D >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Irene R" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:17 AM >>> Subject: Re: [HC] OMA >>> >>> >>>> Hi Denise >>>> >>>> Many thanks. I ould love to have been able to watch all this RATH from >>>> afar. >>>> I think it would have been a hott - never a dull moment! >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Irene R >>>> >>>> Rees/Dowsett Family Page >>>> >>>> http://tribalpages.com/tribes/Brent44 >>>> >>>> -------Original Message------- >>>> >>>> From: Denise >>>> Date: 09/28/05 23:20:32 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [HC] OMA >>>> >>>> 1.6.1861 I think these people paid to have their name in the paper on a >>>> regular basis! >>>> >>>> RATH >>>> >>>> in court, Police Court 30/5/61 >>>> Rath v Mills, Mills v Rath and Same v Same. >>>> Young for Rath. Zincke for Mills >>>> Mills older of a claim through which a track or roadway passes to 3 >>>> Mile. >>>> Rath was a farmer and for years had been in habit of using this road. >>>> Last Monday Mills thought proper to tear up slabs forming a bridge in >>>> part >>>> of this roadway and asRath was passing in to B/worth he and Mills had >>>> high >>>> words and Mills was alleged to have struck Rath's horse with a pick. >>>> The evidence for the defence was a direct contradiction of the evidence >>>> for >>>> the complainant (isn't this normal?). Rath and his son swore Mills was >>>> drunk >>>> >>>> Mills and two Chinamen said he was sober. >>>> Same with nearly every circumstance alleged to have taken place. >>>> One alleged that the other had called very ugly names while the person >>>> charged exclaimed 'he wouldn't do so'. Bench obviously got sick of the >>>> whole >>>> deal, dismissed the case and made each party pay his own costs. >>>> - >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>>> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/113 - Release Date: 9/27/05 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>>> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/113 - Release Date: 9/27/05 >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/114 - Release Date: 9/28/05 >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/114 - Release Date: 9/28/05

    09/30/2005 11:40:23
    1. Re: [HC] OMA
    2. Irene R

    3. Many thanks, Denise. Regards Irene R Rees/Dowsett Family Page http://tribalpages.com/tribes/Brent44 -------Original Message------- From: Denise Date: 09/29/05 16:10:32 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HC] OMA I have run thru the OMA until 15th June and have not found any results to the Challenge Irene. Maybe later in the papers. Kerry - there's been nothing to indicate who took over the British Hotel, maybe at the end of the year and license time will reveal! -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/114 - Release Date: 9/28/05

    09/29/2005 12:06:56
    1. Re: [HC] OMA
    2. Kerry

    3. Thanks Denise ----- Original Message ----- From: Denise To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:10 PM Subject: Re: [HC] OMA I have run thru the OMA until 15th June and have not found any results to the Challenge Irene. Maybe later in the papers. Kerry - there's been nothing to indicate who took over the British Hotel, maybe at the end of the year and license time will reveal! Denise ----- Original Message ----- From: "Irene R" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:08 PM Subject: Re: [HC] OMA > Thanks very much Denise. What a funny bunch. Talk about prickly pride. As > you say, there must have been no election just then. Had to fill the paper > with something I suppose > > Regards > > Irene R > > Rees/Dowsett Family Page > > http://tribalpages.com/tribes/Brent44 > > -------Original Message------- > > From: Denise > Date: 09/29/05 14:23:04 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [HC] OMA > > Irene. > > I posted more than one about the Challenge of Rath and the other but there > is only one in the archives. > I'm sending it thru again, luckily I haven't cleared out my Sent Box since > then. > > Denise > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Denise" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:19 AM > Subject: Re: [HC] OMA > > >> Irene hi >> I didn't see the results printed, but I'll scan back over it later for >> you >> to see if I missed. The papers suddenly became full of a couple of deaths >> of major players in Beechworth and the election of Mining Board - all >> else >> goes out the window when an election is on. >> >> D >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Irene R" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:17 AM >> Subject: Re: [HC] OMA >> >> >>> Hi Denise >>> >>> Many thanks. I ould love to have been able to watch all this RATH from >>> afar. >>> I think it would have been a hott - never a dull moment! >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Irene R >>> >>> Rees/Dowsett Family Page >>> >>> http://tribalpages.com/tribes/Brent44 >>> >>> -------Original Message------- >>> >>> From: Denise >>> Date: 09/28/05 23:20:32 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [HC] OMA >>> >>> 1.6.1861 I think these people paid to have their name in the paper on a >>> regular basis! >>> >>> RATH >>> >>> in court, Police Court 30/5/61 >>> Rath v Mills, Mills v Rath and Same v Same. >>> Young for Rath. Zincke for Mills >>> Mills older of a claim through which a track or roadway passes to 3 >>> Mile. >>> Rath was a farmer and for years had been in habit of using this road. >>> Last Monday Mills thought proper to tear up slabs forming a bridge in >>> part >>> of this roadway and asRath was passing in to B/worth he and Mills had >>> high >>> words and Mills was alleged to have struck Rath's horse with a pick. >>> The evidence for the defence was a direct contradiction of the evidence >>> for >>> the complainant (isn't this normal?). Rath and his son swore Mills was >>> drunk >>> >>> Mills and two Chinamen said he was sober. >>> Same with nearly every circumstance alleged to have taken place. >>> One alleged that the other had called very ugly names while the person >>> charged exclaimed 'he wouldn't do so'. Bench obviously got sick of the >>> whole >>> deal, dismissed the case and made each party pay his own costs. >>> - >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/113 - Release Date: 9/27/05 >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/113 - Release Date: 9/27/05 > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/114 - Release Date: 9/28/05 > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/114 - Release Date: 9/28/05 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.8/114 - Release Date: 28/09/2005

    09/29/2005 12:27:00