Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [GEELONG] Thomas Gillett
    2. Dorothy Moore
    3. Yes Sherrie, my huge mistake, he died in 1882. Many thanks for sorting me out and for finding his parents marriage. regards dorothy ~~~~~~~~~ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Sherrie Blackman Sent: Saturday, 30 June 2007 8:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [GEELONG] Thomas Gillett Hi Dorothy, Okay, I'm confused. lol In your original email you said... 'Thomas Gillett, b: 1822, Drayton, Somersetshire, England.' snip He died in 1822 - I have yet to obtain this death cert.' As I could not find a death for 1922, I assumed it to be 1882, when Thomas Gillett (son of John Gillett & Mary Austin) died. However I see there is another 'Thomas' death in 1882. Is this your Thomas? Digger - Pioneer Index. Victoria 1836-1888 Surname: GILLETT Given Names: Thomas Event: D Spouse Surname/Father: John Spouse Gvn Names/Mother: Age: 60 Sex: Birth Place: Death Place: GEELONG Year: 1882 Reg Number: 8765 Denomination: Parish: Fiche: This may be your John & Jane's marriage in Somerset... JOHN GILLETT Spouse: JANE DIMOCK Marriage: 05 OCT 1808 - Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England Your Thomas can't be the Grandson of Jacob & Caroline, as they didn't marry until 1870 Victoria. Kind regards, Sherrie. On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:06:40 +1000, Dorothy Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sherrie, Susan & Graham, > > many thanks for the Gillett information. > > 'My' Thomas' parents listed on the marriage cert dated 13/10/1879 are > John Gillett and Jane Demick/Dermick, can't quite make it out (I > suspect the > John could well have been used instead of James - yes?) > > Now it seems from Susan's info, 'my' Thomas was the grandson of Jacob and > Caroline, not a nephew. > > Help!! - I am having a very challenging day, so I may well be > mis-understanding much of the detail. > > Graham, it looks like our families are not connected - yet! I do > appreciate your offer to exchange info. > > Look forward to the next chapter on this elusive man in our family. He > must have been a good chap really. He had eight children from his first > marriage and when his wife died, there were five living, the youngest > 18. then he > took on two youngsters eight years and two years - (I'd have run for my > life..........). > > thanks > dorothy > > http://www.silkweb.com.au/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District http://www.zades.com.au ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    06/30/2007 03:10:21