Hi Susie Do you know where I can look up a birth at sea in 1831 on board the "Bussorah Merchant" ship which arrived on 14/12/1831 in Port Jackson, Sydney, NSW The family were assisted passengers. and a birth on onboard the "James Brown" arrived Jan 1853. Kind regards Sue Barnes
Hi Folks, We're looking for some help in identifying a photo that may have an incorrect caption. Photo and details are at the top of the list at ............. http://zades.com.au/gandd/index.php/geelong/gdhelp Regards ............. Susie Z
Hi Chris, Can you give a little more information? When did he die? Who were his parents? What references do you have linking him to Geelong? The surname has been variously transcribed as AWAXKE, AWECKE, AWEGE [Geelong & District Book Index] and AWEGE on the Unassisted Passenger Index for August 1853 on the Wilhelmsburg. Passenger Index shows Gottlieb AWEGE - when did he use the name Joseph Gottlieb AxxxEGE? Regards ........... Susie Z ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Ward" <ceejay@internode.on.net> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 6:54 PM Subject: Re: [GEELONG] Passengers Wilhelmsburg 1852 > Sorry - A senior's moment!! Joseph Gottlieb AVAGE/AVEGE. It certainly > could be 1853.
Chris, this is in the index AWEGE GOTTLIEB arrived12AUG 1853 on the WILHELMSBURG F from foreign port fiche 013 page 011 There were no other passengers with this surname. You can check passengers here http://proarchives.imagineering.com.au/index_search.asp?searchid=23 To see if he was wwith anther family it would be necessary to find someone illing to check the records at the PRO. They do not offer a research service uinfortunately. I saved all my migration research up and travelled the 4 hours to MElbounre and spent a full day checking my research. good luck Robyn
Sorry - A senior's moment!! Joseph Gottlieb AVAGE/AVEGE. It certainly could be 1853. Regards, Chris -----Original Message----- From: aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Robyn Gross Sent: Sunday, 16 August 2009 4:42 PM To: aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [GEELONG] Passengers Wilhelmsburg 1852 Hi Chris, are you sure it is 1852 I could find it arriving 1853 with around 8 11-13 yo males so a name would definintely help. regards Robyn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Susie Zada" <szada@zades.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 4:47 PM Subject: Re: [GEELONG] Passengers Wilhelmsburg 1852 > Hi Chris, > > Does this 11 or 12 year old lad have a name? > > Regards ........... Susie Z > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Ward" <ceejay@internode.on.net> > To: <AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 4:44 PM > Subject: [GEELONG] Passengers Wilhelmsburg 1852 > > >> G'day List, >> >> >> >> I'm seeking confirmation that an 11 or 12 year old lad from Hamburg, >> Germany >> disembarked at Geelong from the vessel Wilhelmsburg in 1852. Apart from >> confirmation I'm interested in who he travelled with and where he was for >> the next 5 years or so before he left for the goldfields. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District > http://zades.com.au > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District http://zades.com.au ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Hi Folks, The Public Record Office Victoria and the Geelong & District Historical Association have announced a competition based on VPRS 815 : Geelong Court of Insolvency records Details can be found at ................ http://zades.com.au We encourage everyone to participate - the insolvent doesn't have to be a relative - perhaps you might choose someone from your area. And it could be a "team" effort - more than one person working on a particular insolvent. I've uploaded the index for just VPRS 815 so you don't need to trawl through the whole Potpourri database - of course these entries all appear in the Potpourri Database but for this competition I've added the extra list to make it easier. WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? Apart from the fun of a competition, it is important that we get as many entries as possible to highlight the benefits of these records. It is possible that VPRS 815 will be escalated in priority for digitisation of these files which will benefit ALL of us! So get moving and have fun!!!!!!!!!!! If you have any questions, please ask me. Regards ........... Susie Z P.S. The entries for the competition are limited to Insolvents registered prior to 1910 although the index entries on the Potpourri Database cover the period to 1933.
Hi Chris, are you sure it is 1852 I could find it arriving 1853 with around 8 11-13 yo males so a name would definintely help. regards Robyn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Susie Zada" <szada@zades.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 4:47 PM Subject: Re: [GEELONG] Passengers Wilhelmsburg 1852 > Hi Chris, > > Does this 11 or 12 year old lad have a name? > > Regards ........... Susie Z > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Ward" <ceejay@internode.on.net> > To: <AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 4:44 PM > Subject: [GEELONG] Passengers Wilhelmsburg 1852 > > >> G'day List, >> >> >> >> I'm seeking confirmation that an 11 or 12 year old lad from Hamburg, >> Germany >> disembarked at Geelong from the vessel Wilhelmsburg in 1852. Apart from >> confirmation I'm interested in who he travelled with and where he was for >> the next 5 years or so before he left for the goldfields. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District > http://zades.com.au > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >
Hi Chris, Does this 11 or 12 year old lad have a name? Regards ........... Susie Z ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Ward" <ceejay@internode.on.net> To: <AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 4:44 PM Subject: [GEELONG] Passengers Wilhelmsburg 1852 > G'day List, > > > > I'm seeking confirmation that an 11 or 12 year old lad from Hamburg, > Germany > disembarked at Geelong from the vessel Wilhelmsburg in 1852. Apart from > confirmation I'm interested in who he travelled with and where he was for > the next 5 years or so before he left for the goldfields.
G'day List, I'm seeking confirmation that an 11 or 12 year old lad from Hamburg, Germany disembarked at Geelong from the vessel Wilhelmsburg in 1852. Apart from confirmation I'm interested in who he travelled with and where he was for the next 5 years or so before he left for the goldfields. Regards, Chris in Aadelaide
Hello List, I am wrting to see, if anyone is going to the Western Cemetery, Geelong, could they please take a photo of a grave for me, Any help would be greatly appreciated. HUGHES Edward and Sophia Church of England Section 1 Grave 478 Thank you Pat
Hi Ada - I will see if the Vaccination Books of any sort are at GHC tomorrow BUT I don't think they are. I will pass this onto the Winch His Soc members in case they are not on the mailing list and see what they know or can find out. regards, Pam Jennings ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ada Ackerly" <aackers@alphalink.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:15 PM Subject: [GEELONG] Geelong Hist Records Query > Hello knowledgeable ones! > > Several years ago, when I was researching for a talk "Missing Birth > Registrations: Why Didn't They Register Him?", I mentioned the local > "Vaccination Books" which gave (usually) a date and place of birth, > father's name, etc in order to identify the child to make sure the > parents had obeyed the "Compulsory Smallpox Vaccination" Act. I noted > that the VPRO held 41 of these books from various councils, lodged by > the Registrar General's Department. > > I had particularly mentioned the books of Winchelsea, which were not > then in the VPRO, but kept locally, and I had viewed them at the council > offices, before the council amalgamations, and wondered what had become > of them since then. > > At the time, it was a common thought of the listers, that Winchelsea > records were most likely lodged at the Geelong Historical Centre. > > I am now updating that talk for a seminar at Yarrawonga, and I wonder if > anyone who uses the Geelong H Centre could tell me: Are the Winchelsea > Vaccination Books (and any other Vacc. Books from other centres) lodged > at the Geelong H Centre? > > The Vaccination Books have some importance, because some children, > locally registered AND vaccinated, did not have their birth > registrations forwarded to the Central Registry as required by law, so > the only record is in the vaccination books. Not many, mind, but if one > of them is YOURS! then it's good to be able to check. > > Can someone with experience of the catalogue of the Geelong H Centre > check for me please?... Winchelsea and any other council? > > I would really appreciate it. > > Regards Ada Ackerly > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District > http://zades.com.au > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Hello knowledgeable ones! Several years ago, when I was researching for a talk "Missing Birth Registrations: Why Didn't They Register Him?", I mentioned the local "Vaccination Books" which gave (usually) a date and place of birth, father's name, etc in order to identify the child to make sure the parents had obeyed the "Compulsory Smallpox Vaccination" Act. I noted that the VPRO held 41 of these books from various councils, lodged by the Registrar General's Department. I had particularly mentioned the books of Winchelsea, which were not then in the VPRO, but kept locally, and I had viewed them at the council offices, before the council amalgamations, and wondered what had become of them since then. At the time, it was a common thought of the listers, that Winchelsea records were most likely lodged at the Geelong Historical Centre. I am now updating that talk for a seminar at Yarrawonga, and I wonder if anyone who uses the Geelong H Centre could tell me: Are the Winchelsea Vaccination Books (and any other Vacc. Books from other centres) lodged at the Geelong H Centre? The Vaccination Books have some importance, because some children, locally registered AND vaccinated, did not have their birth registrations forwarded to the Central Registry as required by law, so the only record is in the vaccination books. Not many, mind, but if one of them is YOURS! then it's good to be able to check. Can someone with experience of the catalogue of the Geelong H Centre check for me please?... Winchelsea and any other council? I would really appreciate it. Regards Ada Ackerly
Good Afternoon thank you John Sebire for your time - this confirms that Jane did marry again and why her name appears on a marriage certificate as mother. Cheers Libby Libby Morrah Administration Officer CSIRO Property Services 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 P O Box 1130, Bentley WA 6102 Phone: 08 6436 8822 Fax: 08 6436 8666 Mobile: 0407 044 724 Email: Libby.Morrah@csiro.au -----Original Message----- From: aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of John Sebire Sent: Monday, 20 July 2009 14:19 To: aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [GEELONG] Morrow - Gilmour / Gilmore To add to the confusion I found the following death Digger - Federation Index. Victoria 1889-1901 Query ----- Surname : gilmore (142 matches) Given Names : jane (20791 matches) Total matching records: 11 -------------------- Surname: GILMORE Given Names: Jane Event: D Sex: F Spouse Surname/Father: Morrow Jas Spouse Gvn Names/Mother: Isabel MCCURDIE Age: 86 Age Code: Birth Place: Death Place: Glong Year: 1895 Reg. Number: 1820 John Sebire, Lilydale, Vic. On Monday 20 Jul 2009 13:49:15 Libby.Morrah@csiro.au wrote: > Hello > Could someone help me find a marriage of a Jane Agnew (nee Morrow) to a > John Gilmour/Gilmore. > Cheers > Libby ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District http://zades.com.au ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Good Afternoon Alwynne Thank you for your time in looking up a marriage. I have found that they indeed married before they came to Geelong - second marriage for Jane. Cheers Libby Libby Morrah Administration Officer CSIRO Property Services 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 P O Box 1130, Bentley WA 6102 Phone: 08 6436 8822 Fax: 08 6436 8666 Mobile: 0407 044 724 Email: Libby.Morrah@csiro.au -----Original Message----- From: aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Alwynne Mackie Sent: Monday, 20 July 2009 13:47 To: aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [GEELONG] Morrow - Gilmour / Gilmore I had a look in the Victorian records and could find no marriage for a Jane Agnew to a John Gilmour (re). Nor could I find her marriage to anyone Agnew. However I did find the death of a Mary Jane Agnew, d of William Agnew and Jane Morrow, died Northcote aged 72 in 1903. As Mary Jane would have been born in 1831, and the Morrow/Agnew marriage presumably before that, it is quite likely the Agnew/Gilmour marriage pre-dates the Victorian records. However, for the record, there was a John Agnew, married to a Cathereine Gillespie, and having children in Geelong in 1842-48. Cheers, Alwynne ----- Original Message ----- From: <Libby.Morrah@csiro.au> To: <AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 1:49 PM Subject: [GEELONG] Morrow - Gilmour / Gilmore > Hello > > Could someone help me find a marriage of a Jane Agnew (nee Morrow) to a > John Gilmour/Gilmore. > > Cheers > Libby > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District > http://zades.com.au > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District http://zades.com.au ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Liz HI Everyone Re the unsolicited emails - Yes I guess it is a sign of the times and we just have to live with it. A big thank you to Susie (and possibly others) for spending time catching the likes of these nuisances when possible, to prevent them going through. I find the Digest very interesting and useful as well as inspiring, with the spirit of co-operation abounding within. Does anyone know of any lists of Foster Mothers that may exist for the Geelong area circa 1860, please? Am still looking for the mysterious Elizabeth Jane King, named in family M and D docs as my gtGfather's mother, though she really wasn't. There seems to be no record of her marrying my gtgtGFather James Dedman circa 1862 after the death of his legal wife Jane Elizabeth Barber in that year. This is a brickwall I can't seem to crack! Cheers All Liz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District http://zades.com.au Today's Topics: 1. Re: unsolicited ads on the communication page (Susie Zada) 2. Re: unsolicited ads on the communication page (Doug) 3. Re: unsolicited ads on the communication page (Val Burge) 4. Re: unsolicited ads on the communication page (Daryl) 5. Re: unsolicited ads on the communication page (Helen Grace) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:40:48 +1000 From: "Susie Zada" <szada@zades.com.au> Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page To: <contact@mansfieldonline.com.au>, <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <0F8DC64B31E9493C8C44B9EAC728CF94@sz> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Hi Liz, You're spot on and I also should have cropped the tail of the message before replying (I generally try to remember but sometimes in a bit of a hurry). I think you might find that the poster (Kim) probably had no part in "creating" the link (which I haven't bothered to look at) - it looks like a hotmail insertion which is how they (Hotmail) fund their "free" email addresses etc. They fund it by advertising for all and sundry and the detail below the line would be automatically added to the email before Hotmail release it. I'm not sure that there is an option to suppress any advertising being added to your emails - it's automatic. This is the case with several other "free" email providers. Also, it's nothing that I can control as List Admin or that Rootsweb can easily strip before sending on the emails to the various Mailing Lists. However I will check with the Rootsweb List Admin Mailing List to see if there has been any discussion or options from their end. In the meantime, my best suggestion is don't bother to follow any sort of link like that on any Mailing List or emails. By the way - the advert / link came through on individual List Mail as well as Digest Mail. Hope that helps answer your concerns. Regards ............. Susie Z (List Admin) ----- Original Message ----- From: "contact@mansfieldonline" <contact@mansfieldonline.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:14 PM Subject: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > Dear All > Call me a Wowser, Prude or Square but I really feel it is offensive to > have > ads like the following in our newsletters- see below the line under the > following message which arrived in today's edition of > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT Digest, Vol 4, Issue 94. > Enough to give the Digest a stomach ache :)) > > Keep up the good work, Listers > Cheers > Liz Seaton > ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:18:40 +1000 From: "Doug" <doug@praas.com.au> Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAKh3IhGHJq5Gqdvr0PVtxcCiggAAEAAAAMnbIhnSArFCjGwbydsp NZIBAAAAAA==@praas.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Suzie, Yes I agree entirely. The sender does not insert the advert, it is done by the free service, whatever that may be. Doug Price -----Original Message----- From: aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Susie Zada Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 6:41 PM To: contact@mansfieldonline.com.au; aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page Hi Liz, You're spot on and I also should have cropped the tail of the message before replying (I generally try to remember but sometimes in a bit of a hurry). I think you might find that the poster (Kim) probably had no part in "creating" the link (which I haven't bothered to look at) - it looks like a hotmail insertion which is how they (Hotmail) fund their "free" email addresses etc. They fund it by advertising for all and sundry and the detail below the line would be automatically added to the email before Hotmail release it. I'm not sure that there is an option to suppress any advertising being added to your emails - it's automatic. This is the case with several other "free" email providers. Also, it's nothing that I can control as List Admin or that Rootsweb can easily strip before sending on the emails to the various Mailing Lists. However I will check with the Rootsweb List Admin Mailing List to see if there has been any discussion or options from their end. In the meantime, my best suggestion is don't bother to follow any sort of link like that on any Mailing List or emails. By the way - the advert / link came through on individual List Mail as well as Digest Mail. Hope that helps answer your concerns. Regards ............. Susie Z (List Admin) Snip ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:01:56 +1000 From: "Val Burge" <valburge@iinet.net.au> Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <76A149A311954DF098D1C765A5C9A8AC@expy> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original You can't afford to be too much of a 'wowser' on the internet, or you are going to end up awfully offended. My advice is to just ignore it. It's meaningless drivel. Val ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug" <doug@praas.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > Hi Suzie, > > Yes I agree entirely. The sender does not insert the advert, it is done > by > the free service, whatever that may be. > > Doug Price > > -----Original Message----- > From: aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Susie > Zada > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 6:41 PM > To: contact@mansfieldonline.com.au; aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > > Hi Liz, > > You're spot on and I also should have cropped the tail of the message > before > > replying (I generally try to remember but sometimes in a bit of a hurry). > > I think you might find that the poster (Kim) probably had no part in > "creating" the link (which I haven't bothered to look at) - it looks like > a > hotmail insertion which is how they (Hotmail) fund their "free" email > addresses etc. They fund it by advertising for all and sundry and the > detail below the line would be automatically added to the email before > Hotmail release it. > > I'm not sure that there is an option to suppress any advertising being > added > > to your emails - it's automatic. This is the case with several other > "free" > > email providers. > > Also, it's nothing that I can control as List Admin or that Rootsweb can > easily strip before sending on the emails to the various Mailing Lists. > However I will check with the Rootsweb List Admin Mailing List to see if > there has been any discussion or options from their end. > > In the meantime, my best suggestion is don't bother to follow any sort of > link like that on any Mailing List or emails. > > By the way - the advert / link came through on individual List Mail as > well > as Digest Mail. > > Hope that helps answer your concerns. > > Regards ............. Susie Z (List Admin) > > Snip > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District > http://zades.com.au > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.13.20/2250 - Release Date: 20/07/2009 6:16 AM ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:46:54 +1000 From: "Daryl" <Dasha_m@tpg.com.au> Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <3FAD57C878AD45A3B4AB1AB2AB69323E@m9080aPC> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Its a sign of the times either you pay or an advertiser pays. I think we'd rather the advertiser. It was nothing risqu? Daryl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug" <doug@praas.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > Hi Suzie, > > Yes I agree entirely. The sender does not insert the advert, it is done > by > the free service, whatever that may be. > > Doug Price > > -----Original Message----- > From: aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Susie > Zada > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 6:41 PM > To: contact@mansfieldonline.com.au; aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > > Hi Liz, > > You're spot on and I also should have cropped the tail of the message > before > > replying (I generally try to remember but sometimes in a bit of a hurry). > > I think you might find that the poster (Kim) probably had no part in > "creating" the link (which I haven't bothered to look at) - it looks like > a > hotmail insertion which is how they (Hotmail) fund their "free" email > addresses etc. They fund it by advertising for all and sundry and the > detail below the line would be automatically added to the email before > Hotmail release it. > > I'm not sure that there is an option to suppress any advertising being > added > > to your emails - it's automatic. This is the case with several other > "free" > > email providers. > > Also, it's nothing that I can control as List Admin or that Rootsweb can > easily strip before sending on the emails to the various Mailing Lists. > However I will check with the Rootsweb List Admin Mailing List to see if > there has been any discussion or options from their end. > > In the meantime, my best suggestion is don't bother to follow any sort of > link like that on any Mailing List or emails. > > By the way - the advert / link came through on individual List Mail as > well > as Digest Mail. > > Hope that helps answer your concerns. > > Regards ............. Susie Z (List Admin) > > Snip > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District > http://zades.com.au > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4268 (20090722) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:10:43 +1000 From: "Helen Grace" <helengrace6@bigpond.com> Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <A1644775F1A84031B2DBA1E6FED0A196@pcusera256fae0> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original So right Daryl, that's about it in a nutshell. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daryl" <Dasha_m@tpg.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:46 AM Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page Its a sign of the times either you pay or an advertiser pays. I think we'd rather the advertiser. It was nothing risqu? Daryl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug" <doug@praas.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > Hi Suzie, > > Yes I agree entirely. The sender does not insert the advert, it is done > by > the free service, whatever that may be. > > Doug Price > > -----Original Message----- > From: aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Susie > Zada > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 6:41 PM > To: contact@mansfieldonline.com.au; aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > > Hi Liz, > > You're spot on and I also should have cropped the tail of the message > before > > replying (I generally try to remember but sometimes in a bit of a hurry). > > I think you might find that the poster (Kim) probably had no part in > "creating" the link (which I haven't bothered to look at) - it looks like > a > hotmail insertion which is how they (Hotmail) fund their "free" email > addresses etc. They fund it by advertising for all and sundry and the > detail below the line would be automatically added to the email before > Hotmail release it. > > I'm not sure that there is an option to suppress any advertising being > added > > to your emails - it's automatic. This is the case with several other > "free" > > email providers. > > Also, it's nothing that I can control as List Admin or that Rootsweb can > easily strip before sending on the emails to the various Mailing Lists. > However I will check with the Rootsweb List Admin Mailing List to see if > there has been any discussion or options from their end. > > In the meantime, my best suggestion is don't bother to follow any sort of > link like that on any Mailing List or emails. > > By the way - the advert / link came through on individual List Mail as > well > as Digest Mail. > > Hope that helps answer your concerns. > > Regards ............. Susie Z (List Admin) > > Snip > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District > http://zades.com.au > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4268 (20090722) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District http://zades.com.au ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.22/2253 - Release Date: 07/21/09 18:02:00 ------------------------------ To contact the AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT list administrator, send an email to AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-admin@rootsweb.com. To post a message to the AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT mailing list, send an email to AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT@rootsweb.com. __________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body of the email with no additional text. End of AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT Digest, Vol 4, Issue 96 *******************************************************
So right Daryl, that's about it in a nutshell. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daryl" <Dasha_m@tpg.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:46 AM Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page Its a sign of the times either you pay or an advertiser pays. I think we'd rather the advertiser. It was nothing risqué Daryl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug" <doug@praas.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > Hi Suzie, > > Yes I agree entirely. The sender does not insert the advert, it is done > by > the free service, whatever that may be. > > Doug Price > > -----Original Message----- > From: aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Susie > Zada > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 6:41 PM > To: contact@mansfieldonline.com.au; aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > > Hi Liz, > > You're spot on and I also should have cropped the tail of the message > before > > replying (I generally try to remember but sometimes in a bit of a hurry). > > I think you might find that the poster (Kim) probably had no part in > "creating" the link (which I haven't bothered to look at) - it looks like > a > hotmail insertion which is how they (Hotmail) fund their "free" email > addresses etc. They fund it by advertising for all and sundry and the > detail below the line would be automatically added to the email before > Hotmail release it. > > I'm not sure that there is an option to suppress any advertising being > added > > to your emails - it's automatic. This is the case with several other > "free" > > email providers. > > Also, it's nothing that I can control as List Admin or that Rootsweb can > easily strip before sending on the emails to the various Mailing Lists. > However I will check with the Rootsweb List Admin Mailing List to see if > there has been any discussion or options from their end. > > In the meantime, my best suggestion is don't bother to follow any sort of > link like that on any Mailing List or emails. > > By the way - the advert / link came through on individual List Mail as > well > as Digest Mail. > > Hope that helps answer your concerns. > > Regards ............. Susie Z (List Admin) > > Snip > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District > http://zades.com.au > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4268 (20090722) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District http://zades.com.au ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.22/2253 - Release Date: 07/21/09 18:02:00
Its a sign of the times either you pay or an advertiser pays. I think we'd rather the advertiser. It was nothing risqué Daryl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug" <doug@praas.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > Hi Suzie, > > Yes I agree entirely. The sender does not insert the advert, it is done > by > the free service, whatever that may be. > > Doug Price > > -----Original Message----- > From: aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Susie > Zada > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 6:41 PM > To: contact@mansfieldonline.com.au; aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > > Hi Liz, > > You're spot on and I also should have cropped the tail of the message > before > > replying (I generally try to remember but sometimes in a bit of a hurry). > > I think you might find that the poster (Kim) probably had no part in > "creating" the link (which I haven't bothered to look at) - it looks like > a > hotmail insertion which is how they (Hotmail) fund their "free" email > addresses etc. They fund it by advertising for all and sundry and the > detail below the line would be automatically added to the email before > Hotmail release it. > > I'm not sure that there is an option to suppress any advertising being > added > > to your emails - it's automatic. This is the case with several other > "free" > > email providers. > > Also, it's nothing that I can control as List Admin or that Rootsweb can > easily strip before sending on the emails to the various Mailing Lists. > However I will check with the Rootsweb List Admin Mailing List to see if > there has been any discussion or options from their end. > > In the meantime, my best suggestion is don't bother to follow any sort of > link like that on any Mailing List or emails. > > By the way - the advert / link came through on individual List Mail as > well > as Digest Mail. > > Hope that helps answer your concerns. > > Regards ............. Susie Z (List Admin) > > Snip > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District > http://zades.com.au > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4268 (20090722) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > >
You can't afford to be too much of a 'wowser' on the internet, or you are going to end up awfully offended. My advice is to just ignore it. It's meaningless drivel. Val ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug" <doug@praas.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > Hi Suzie, > > Yes I agree entirely. The sender does not insert the advert, it is done > by > the free service, whatever that may be. > > Doug Price > > -----Original Message----- > From: aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Susie > Zada > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 6:41 PM > To: contact@mansfieldonline.com.au; aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > > Hi Liz, > > You're spot on and I also should have cropped the tail of the message > before > > replying (I generally try to remember but sometimes in a bit of a hurry). > > I think you might find that the poster (Kim) probably had no part in > "creating" the link (which I haven't bothered to look at) - it looks like > a > hotmail insertion which is how they (Hotmail) fund their "free" email > addresses etc. They fund it by advertising for all and sundry and the > detail below the line would be automatically added to the email before > Hotmail release it. > > I'm not sure that there is an option to suppress any advertising being > added > > to your emails - it's automatic. This is the case with several other > "free" > > email providers. > > Also, it's nothing that I can control as List Admin or that Rootsweb can > easily strip before sending on the emails to the various Mailing Lists. > However I will check with the Rootsweb List Admin Mailing List to see if > there has been any discussion or options from their end. > > In the meantime, my best suggestion is don't bother to follow any sort of > link like that on any Mailing List or emails. > > By the way - the advert / link came through on individual List Mail as > well > as Digest Mail. > > Hope that helps answer your concerns. > > Regards ............. Susie Z (List Admin) > > Snip > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > For on-line indexes and information on Geelong and District > http://zades.com.au > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.13.20/2250 - Release Date: 20/07/2009 6:16 AM
Hi Suzie, Yes I agree entirely. The sender does not insert the advert, it is done by the free service, whatever that may be. Doug Price -----Original Message----- From: aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:aus-vic-geelong-district-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Susie Zada Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 6:41 PM To: contact@mansfieldonline.com.au; aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page Hi Liz, You're spot on and I also should have cropped the tail of the message before replying (I generally try to remember but sometimes in a bit of a hurry). I think you might find that the poster (Kim) probably had no part in "creating" the link (which I haven't bothered to look at) - it looks like a hotmail insertion which is how they (Hotmail) fund their "free" email addresses etc. They fund it by advertising for all and sundry and the detail below the line would be automatically added to the email before Hotmail release it. I'm not sure that there is an option to suppress any advertising being added to your emails - it's automatic. This is the case with several other "free" email providers. Also, it's nothing that I can control as List Admin or that Rootsweb can easily strip before sending on the emails to the various Mailing Lists. However I will check with the Rootsweb List Admin Mailing List to see if there has been any discussion or options from their end. In the meantime, my best suggestion is don't bother to follow any sort of link like that on any Mailing List or emails. By the way - the advert / link came through on individual List Mail as well as Digest Mail. Hope that helps answer your concerns. Regards ............. Susie Z (List Admin) Snip
Hi Liz, You're spot on and I also should have cropped the tail of the message before replying (I generally try to remember but sometimes in a bit of a hurry). I think you might find that the poster (Kim) probably had no part in "creating" the link (which I haven't bothered to look at) - it looks like a hotmail insertion which is how they (Hotmail) fund their "free" email addresses etc. They fund it by advertising for all and sundry and the detail below the line would be automatically added to the email before Hotmail release it. I'm not sure that there is an option to suppress any advertising being added to your emails - it's automatic. This is the case with several other "free" email providers. Also, it's nothing that I can control as List Admin or that Rootsweb can easily strip before sending on the emails to the various Mailing Lists. However I will check with the Rootsweb List Admin Mailing List to see if there has been any discussion or options from their end. In the meantime, my best suggestion is don't bother to follow any sort of link like that on any Mailing List or emails. By the way - the advert / link came through on individual List Mail as well as Digest Mail. Hope that helps answer your concerns. Regards ............. Susie Z (List Admin) ----- Original Message ----- From: "contact@mansfieldonline" <contact@mansfieldonline.com.au> To: <aus-vic-geelong-district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:14 PM Subject: [GEELONG] unsolicited ads on the communication page > Dear All > Call me a Wowser, Prude or Square but I really feel it is offensive to > have > ads like the following in our newsletters- see below the line under the > following message which arrived in today's edition of > AUS-VIC-GEELONG-DISTRICT Digest, Vol 4, Issue 94. > Enough to give the Digest a stomach ache :)) > > Keep up the good work, Listers > Cheers > Liz Seaton >