That's a very good question. So far I've only found one native born Ann Walker around the required time frame (1829-1830). That's the one born to James Walker/Esther Tucker. Of course, with the Tasmanian records being 100% accurate, there could be others :-). The most accurate records are, of course, the churches and we'd need to go through the whole darned lot to see if there are others. So, what I'm saying is that there is a high probability that the Ann Walker involved in the court case is the daughter of James/Esther. There are some Ann Walkers that were convicts. None of them seem to fit, mainly based on age. Best, Keith > Hi Keith, > > Just out of curiosity and elimination has the Ann Walker that was involved > in the Supreme Court trial of 1843 for assault on the Irvine baby and > later in 1844 herself being "assaulted" by one, Richard Bonner been > identified with the individual that married Jacob Beemer in 1848? > > She's identified as native born aged 14 so born circa 1829 - > https://stors.tas.gov.au/SC32-1-5 go to image 41 >