I have to make the comment, sometimes I even hesitate to put anything to the list for fear of someone saying something/anything.... What does that say I wonder???? Steph. ----- Original Message ----- From: Genie To: mjphoenix@bigpond.com ; steph-ken@bigpond.com ; aus sagen ; judyfh@bigpond.com ; jan royal Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 9:55 PM Subject: RE: [AUS-SAGEN] Queries and Answers. Amazing isnt it.. I have only answered one person since the last blow up and still I get abused by people who cant even continue the open discussion we were all having about the subject without personally attacking those who help Its because of the personal attacks way back,(probably before Steph and Mikes time) that stops me AND MANY OTHERS from wanting to contribute directly to the list. Genie http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/group.php?gid=295203197016 http://geniesgenealogyhelp.blogspot.com/ --- On Fri, 13/8/10, jan royal <janroyal2000@hotmail.com> wrote: From: jan royal <janroyal2000@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: [AUS-SAGEN] Queries and Answers. To: mjphoenix@bigpond.com, steph-ken@bigpond.com, c_tillett@yahoo.com.au, "aus sagen" <aus-sagen-l@rootsweb.com>, judyfh@bigpond.com Date: Friday, 13 August, 2010, 22:13 must be Friday the 13th > From: mjphoenix@bigpond.com > To: steph-ken@bigpond.com; c_tillett@yahoo.com.au; AUS-SAGEN-L@rootsweb.com; judyfh@bigpond.com > Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:42:19 +1000 > Subject: Re: [AUS-SAGEN] Queries and Answers. > > So full of Shit that I find it hard to believe it. > I doubt they can even spell "courtesy". > Is Genie a "protected species" as far at your List Fuhrer is concerned?? > No need to launch another diatribe ....sorry, shitstorm - Genie, I know what > you feel & how "well" you can express it. > > Get off the List, my friends!! It is owned by these "people" wholly & > solely. And where is Heather Hobbis in all this?? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephanie Cocks [mailto:steph-ken@bigpond.com] > Sent: Friday, 13 August 2010 6:53 PM > To: Genie; AUS-SAGEN-L@rootsweb.com; Judy Holding > Subject: Re: [AUS-SAGEN] Queries and Answers. > > > > I'd like to make some further comments, and for ease will reply under > Genie's comments, marked thus **** > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Genie" <c_tillett@yahoo.com.au> > To: <AUS-SAGEN-L@rootsweb.com>; "Judy Holding" <judyfh@bigpond.com> > Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 4:20 PM > Subject: Re: [AUS-SAGEN] Queries and Answers. > > > Unfortunatley this list can NOT be programmed to reply automatically to the > list. > > Whilst that is physically possible to do it, it has been made impossible for > > our list owners to do because of the threat to this list from SAGHS of legal > > action if people copy directly from "their" CD's > > Those of us who opt to help others by looking up things from "our cd's" > which we paid exhorbitant prices to own don't have the time to rearrange the > > info from the cd to suit SAGHS. > THE WAY I WORK IS TO COPY/PASTE THE CD INFORMATION DIRECTLY TO AN EMAIL > WHICH GOES STRAIGHT TO THE PERSON WHO POSTED THE QUERY. THUS NOT PUTTING > COPYRIGHTED INFORMATION ONTO THE LIST. THEREBY NOT RISKING THE IRE OF > SAGHS. > THEN A QUICK POST TO SAY WHAT HAS BEEN SENT, TO THE LIST. > > > Many times Steph and others including me have said we dont have time to > waste doing that. > COULD NOT AGREE MORE CHRIS. > > In a perfect world person 1 would post a question, which would appear > instantly on the list and in other listers inboxes... > person 2 would answer and post a reply to the list.. which again would > instantly appear on the list and in the inbox of other potential helpers > thus saving that person from wasting time re looking up something which is > answered. > > Many time I have seen Steph, Mike and others complain about answers arriving > > before questions, and about messages posted to the list which sometimes have > > not turned up on the list for 24 hrs or more > GENERALLY THE POSTS ARE FAIRLY QUICK, WOULD BE A FAIRLY RARE THAT POSTS TOOK > > THAT LONG TO APPEAR. NOT IMPOSSIBLE, BUT NOT OFTEN. > > Given the reality of delay in messages I fail to understand how anyone can > claim person 2 posting to the list would save person 3 from wasting time.. > that is not the way reality works. > SHOULD WORK FAIRLY WELL UNLESS PERSON 3 IS WAITING WITH THEIR DISC READY TO > FIRE UP. > > Next point is, this is a democracy and no one has the right to tell anyone > else they must post to the list.. > TOO TRUE, BUT I THINK WE NEED TO FIND THE BEST AND FAIREST WAY TO GET AROUND > > THIS PROBLEM. NOT IN ANY PARTICULAR ORDER. > > 1. THAT GETS THE 'REPLY' TO THE QUERY POSTER ASAP, SO THAT THEY MOVE ON WITH > > THEIR RESEARCH. > 2. THAT DOESN'T CONTRAVENE COPYRIGHT > 3. THAT DOESN'T WASTE A WHOLE LOT OF TIME. > 4. THAT MAKES CLEAR WHAT HAS BEEN SENT, THEN IF SOMEONE ELSE CHOOSES TO > FOLLOW IT UP FURTHER THAT IS THEIR CHOICE ENTIRELY. > > SOME HEALTHY DISCUSSION AND INPUT HAS GOT TO BE GOOD. > > Given my previous point of SAGHS very real threat of legal action there are > some of us who prefer our business to be private and not give the lurker > nasty nazis the chance to sit and add up how many we have answered and how > much of our 10% of copyright Free usuage we have racked up > IF RESEARCH IS KEPT PRIVATE, AND YES THAT IS YOUR CHOICE, I FEEL WE AREN'T > SHARING AND FURTHERING OUR 'CAUSE'. > QUICK ANSWER TO THAT, SEND THE INFORMATION OFF LIST. AND BRIEF POST TO THE > LIST ONLY. > > CHRIS, CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN THE 10% OF COPYRIGHT FREE USAGE. FAR AS I CAN > > RECALL I HAVN'T HEARD ABOUT THIS AND HOW IT WORKS. THANKS. > > > Lets be honest SAGHS dont want this list to survive because it thinks it > will sell more cd;s > WELL, MY RESPONSE HAS ALWAYS BEEN, THEY'D SELL MORE IF THE PRICE WAS MORE > REASONABLE. 50c RAFFLE TICKETS ALWAYS SELL QUICKER THAN THE $ ONES. > > In a perfect world person 1 who posted the question would be sitting with > baited breath waiting for an answer and then instantly post what was > received , any further follow up questions hence person 3 would know what > was answered and not waste time looking > The reality is some have a life beside the list > MY THOUGHTS PRECISELY, SO TRYING TO GET AROUND DUPLICATION OF REPLIES TO > PERSON 1. > > I must admit I much preferred the way the list used to work before SAGHS > threat of legal action > I THINK THAT WAS BEFORE MY TIME, BUT YES IT DOES SOUND BETTER. > > Bottom line is can the list afford to lose those who do look ups by making > them feel their contribution is not needed > WOULD NOT THINK SO. > > We all research in different ways.. even from the same resource. > I recall a relative of mine saying where did you get that from? It was a > birth of a relative which my relly had been looking for for years (from the > same SA Births cd I have). they are doing a different branch from me. I had > the birth because I use the cd differently from the way they do. > IF PEOPLE DEMOCRATICALLY CHOOSE TO LOOK FURTHER AFTER PERSON 2 HAS REPLIED > THAT IS THEIR CHOICE ENTIRELY. OR IF PERSON 1 THINKS THEIR QUERY HAS BEEN > FULLY ANSWERED, THEY HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO POST AGAIN AND SAY SO. > > I object to "done" for that reason..it stops others looking when the others > may be the person who finds something person 2 missed. Consequently the fact > > person 3 doesnt look means that it is possible person 1 who posted the > question misses out on info all because person 2 posted "done" and person 3 > doesnt then look > MANY TIMES A SINGLE EVENT IS ASKED FOR, A B D OR M, IF IT IS FOUND CASE > CLOSED. IF IT S A BUNCH OF BIRTHS THAT IS DIFFERENT. BUT I WOULD HOPE THAT > THE LIKES OF MYSELF AND OTHE RPEOPLE WHO ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE DISCS AND > RESEARCH WOULD ALSO CHECK FOR VARIATIONS IN NAMES AND CHECK EITHER SIDE OF > DATES GIVEN. AND NOT FORGETTING TO LOOK THOROUGHLY, SIDEWAYS AND AROUND > CORNERS. SOMETHING WHICH I TRY MY BEST TO DO, MAY NOT ALWAYS SUCCEED, BUT, > ONLY HUMAN AND SO MUCH TIME, LITERALLY AND PHYSICALLY. > > CAN I ALSO SAY THAT IT IS GOOD TO HAVE SOME TO AND FRO AND DISCUSSION ON THE > > LIST, WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PEOPLE NOT OFTEN SEEN ON THE LIST. > STEPH. > > Genie > > http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/group.php?gid=295203197016 > > > > http://geniesgenealogyhelp.blogspot.com/ > > --- On Thu, 12/8/10, Judy Holding <judyfh@bigpond.com> wrote: > > From: Judy Holding <judyfh@bigpond.com> > Subject: Re: [AUS-SAGEN] Queries and Answers. > To: AUS-SAGEN-L@rootsweb.com > Date: Thursday, 12 August, 2010, 16:01 > > Dear List Owner and Listers, > > I am writing to express my disapointment about how this List is being run > the last few months.Sure not like it used to be! > > I thought it was only common courtesy to let the List know when the query > has been attended to so there is no unneccessary time wasted by another > Lister > checking the Info. How long does it take to type and send a 'replied off > list' ? > > Steph and Tracey and other great Listers that help or have helped ( Mike of > Canberra is one ) spend a lot of their spare time and effort to help and > then there are others that send the Info without even letting the list know > that they have attended to the query. Which to me doesn't seem to be RIGHT > WAY at ALL. But they are allowed to get away with it by the List Owner. > > This sort of behaviour makes it very hard to know as I have found myself if > one replies and helps the Lister that is querying for the > Info if you are wasting your time as they already may have the Info. > > I really can see down the track if not sooner this List is 'going down the > gurgler' which is a shame, there is always a few that have to spoil it for > others > on this List and in Life in general. > > Judy. > Advertising on AUS-SAGEN is forbidden by Rootsweb Rules. > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-SAGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > Advertising on AUS-SAGEN is forbidden by Rootsweb Rules. > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > AUS-SAGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3067 - Release Date: 08/13/10 > 04:04:00 > > Advertising on AUS-SAGEN is forbidden by Rootsweb Rules. > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to AUS-SAGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3067 - Release Date: 08/13/10 04:04:00