Elizabeth I apologise as list admin - but tonight has been the first time I have had a chance to read my emails from 1 Sep - (three days) and I still have over 20 digest emails to read - not only as List Admin but for my own research. I agree about Copyright and did not realise that it was such a long document as this. I think I have read page 5 and I am not aware of how many more pages. Further, I was not asked for permission! 10% I understand can be copied without breaching copyright - has anyone asked for permission for it to be copied? Chris, you efforts are very much appreciated by many researchers, but like Elizabeth, I too am concerned about the copy right issues, as much as I am about the privacy issues I am well known for on this list. Lorrae List Admin 8.34 pm Tues 3Sep02 Qld time -----Original Message----- From: Elizabeth [mailto:aliens@bigpond.net.au] Sent: Monday, 2 September 2002 5:52 PM To: AUS-QLD-SE-Germans-L@rootsweb.com Subject: RE: History of the Uckermark To all on the List, Thank you for you e-mails re Les Morlands paper. I have already contacted Chris off line re COPYRIGHT. I feel the best approach for those interested in a copy of this paper would have been to contact the GSQ and ask for a copy of the Journal or a photo copy of the item. To put up Les Morlands paper in full without his permission leaves Chris Sichter open to be sued. I am very surprised that our new list owner allowed Chris to go online with copyright material. Elizabeth ______________________________