Dear Jury: It is my understanding this letter never went to the group. I am sending it again. Juror #1 has answered. But, I will leave this letter as it was. This way I won't have to write it all over again. So, Juror #1 please send your answer to the group so we can discuss it. Here is the letter again with the original format: It is now time to start again. I believe we are all here. I am attempting to get this show on the road with some sort of organization. It seems the best place to start is with juror #1. I am requesting that juror #1 write the group letting us know your determination. RESPOND TO THE GROUP... Juror #1: You may state Mr. Randall is guilty as charged or not guilty as charged. You may in the alternative find him guilty of gross negligence. Then please state your reasoning. The prosecution has presented it's case. You must determine if the defense has been able to rebut the assertions of the prosecution. The burden of proof in is the responsibility of the prosecution. The defendant only need to refute the prosecution. If the defense has done this to your satisfaction then he is innocent. If on the other hand you find the defense has not rebutted the assertions then he is guilty. Please refer to my prior jury instructions. At this point I am not imposing any punishment. If Mr. Randall is found guilty of either charge then the punishment will fit the crime and the person involved. All mitigating factors will be considered. Jury, after Juror #1 has posted their determination and reasons for their conclusion you should all respond in a free and open discussion on this list. SEND YOUR RESPONSE TO THE LIST. Please do not hold back. After each of you has responded we will take a vote again and see how it goes. If you are not all in agreement then juror #2 will post in the same manor as juror #1. This process will continue until you all agree. During this process you will also hear from the judge. I will remind you of the jury instructions if I find you have strayed to far. I will cut all of you some slack as this in the only way to have a free and open discussion. Let the fun begin!!! Juror #1 please step up. The Judge.

Hello Judge,I cleaned up my computer the other day and deleted the trial, as I thought it had been finished with, so I can not reread it, 1.All I know is that he is Not Guilty, as there are too many if's and but's ,and heresay, 2. He might of been a brutal man ,and he might of been pushed too far 3 The head wound was on the back of the head, and only a small mark, 4. Who said that the floor was clean,I can not see how the floor was clean, if you where drinking, the place wouldnt be clean 5 Did some one clean the floor and the area before the police came?? 6 She didnt press charges ,Why. 7 The judge had it in for him,and the family. 8. Who said he intended to hurt her,a spur of the moment thing. 9.If he was drunk, how can he be guilty of gross negligence, he could of been out cold, 10 What and where was the daughter, she must of cleaned her mother up, or the mother cleaned her self up. Carole #1 ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 11:46 PM Subject: Hope this post makes it .......From the Judge > Dear Jury: > > It is my understanding this letter never went to the group. I am sending it > again. Juror #1 has answered. But, I will leave this letter as it was. This > way I won't have to write it all over again. So, Juror #1 please send your > answer to the group so we can discuss it. Here is the letter again with the > original format: > > It is now time to start again. I believe we are all here. I am attempting > to get this show on the road with some sort of organization. > > It seems the best place to start is with juror #1. I am requesting that > juror #1 write the group letting us know your determination. RESPOND TO THE > GROUP... > > Juror #1: You may state Mr. Randall is guilty as charged or not guilty as > charged. You may in the alternative find him guilty of gross negligence. Then > please state your reasoning. > > The prosecution has presented it's case. You must determine if the defense > has been able to rebut the assertions of the prosecution. The burden of proof > in is the responsibility of the prosecution. The defendant only need to > refute the prosecution. If the defense has done this to your satisfaction then he > is innocent. If on the other hand you find the defense has not rebutted the > assertions then he is guilty. Please refer to my prior jury instructions. > > At this point I am not imposing any punishment. If Mr. Randall is found > guilty of either charge then the punishment will fit the crime and the person > involved. All mitigating factors will be considered. > > Jury, after Juror #1 has posted their determination and reasons for their > conclusion you should all respond in a free and open discussion on this list. > SEND YOUR RESPONSE TO THE LIST. > > Please do not hold back. After each of you has responded we will take a vote > again and see how it goes. If you are not all in agreement then juror #2 > will post in the same manor as juror #1. This process will continue until you > all agree. > > During this process you will also hear from the judge. I will remind you of > the jury instructions if I find you have strayed to far. I will cut all of > you some slack as this in the only way to have a free and open discussion. > > Let the fun begin!!! > > Juror #1 please step up. > > The Judge. > > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > > >