Hello AUS-NSW-SE-L, The Judge wants an email from each of us stating either "guilty" or "not guilty", just that, no explanations, zero, zilch. We cannot have a "hung" jury, the verdict must be unanimous. Those who have stated that RANDALL is guilty have done so on spurious grounds and should have a re-think along the lines that if it was you facing that court, how would you want the court to find you, on the glaring lack of evidence. Those of you who "don't know" is a "Not Guilty" verdict, as you imply you have reasonable doubt, and therefore the defendant must have the benefit of this. If you can all comply with this, then we will hear from the Judge. -- Best regards, Mel mailto:[email protected]