Hello AUS-NSW-SE-L, In reference to the case of Regina versus Randall 1879, and at Rhonda's suggestion, all jury members MUST BE SATISFIED BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT of the defendant's guilt. Randall pleaded "not guilty" which puts the onus of proof TOTALLY upon the prosecution. I have noticed with some of the verdicts, that some have pronounced him guilty whilst simultaneously expressing doubts. -- Best regards, Mel Grieveson, Melbourne mailto:[email protected]