* Do you have any genealogical or historical publications to sell? * Do you have an organization you would like to promote? * Would you like to promote your own research interests? We invite you to participate in Manning Wallamba Family History Society Inc.s Genealogical & Historical Fair on Saturday 18th October 2003 10.00am to 3.00pm at Taree Police Citizens Youth Club, Commerce St, Taree Book your display space now:- 1 table & 2 free entries $15.00 2 tables & 2 free entries $25.00 powered sites available Bookings close 31 August 2003 Confirmed speakers include Nick Vine Hall Terry Eakin - Irish Research Enquiries & Bookings Fair Committee Post; PO Box 48, Taree NSW 2430 Email; [email protected] Phone/Fax (02) 65536002 Website; http://www.geocities.com/manningwallambafhs http://mobile.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Mobile - Check & compose your email via SMS on your Telstra or Vodafone mobile.
Dear Jury: Please let me know who's testimony carried the most weight when making your decision. The Judge
NOT GUILTY
I just thought, I would let you know where we are up to with the verdicts. Sunday 29 June, 6.15 pm. Please let me know if this is incorrect. Regards Rhonda. [email protected] Carol, Juror No: 1 verdict NOT GUILTY. [email protected] Mel, Juror No: 2 verdict NOT GUILTY. [email protected] Leanne, Juror No: 3. verdict NOT GUILTY. [email protected] Cheryl, Juror No 4. verdict NOT GUILTY. [email protected] Christene, Juror No 5 verdict GUILTY. [email protected] Rob, Juror No 6 verdict NOT GUILTY. [email protected] Judith, Juror No: 7 verdict GUILTY. [email protected] Tracie, Juror No: 8 NOT GUILTY. [email protected] David, Juror No: 9 GUILTY. [email protected] Penny Juror No: 10: NOT GUILTY. [email protected] Rose, Juror No: 11 GUILTY. [email protected] Amanda, Juror No 12 Not GUILTY.
Hello Vicki. A quick first recourse would be to the British PRO's information. Here is a snip from another list about it: ".. British army records are in the Public Record Office in Kew London. Not all the records are indexed. Their catalogue is on line at http://catalogue.pro.gov.uk Type your ancestor's name and limit the search to say 1780-1850 or whatever, and in the third box put WO. This limits the search to army records. Often this will give the years he served and where he was from ..." Please note that this index is NOT complete (it is being compiled by volunteers, I am told); so he may not appear. While you are at that site, download and print off their Information Leaflets on Military Research. I have looked in my own very limited list of some Staff Corps and Royal NSW Veteran Corps members, and cannot find him. BUT this is not a complete list by any means. Many veterans of the Napoleonic wars came out to Australia with their original regiments if they were later posted here, or may have joined other regiments to be posted out here. By this, I mean that not all "veterans" came out here in a "Veteran Company". Now, IF by chance you should discover that he was a member of the "Royal NSW Veteran Corps", I should love to be advised. My second recommendation would be to look at Barrie & Margaret CHAPMAN's "Aussie Redcoats" site at: http://freepages.history.rootsweb.com/~garter1/ You may strike it lucky and find him there. Good Luck: ray in sydney -- always interested to hear about anyone from the Royal NSW Veteran Companies. ----- Original Message ----- From: "vicki o'reilly" <[email protected]> .... I am trying to track down any information on Alexander Stewart married Margaret > Bell in 1844. He was a widower when this marriage took place. Family stories > have him working in the Berry area and as being ex-military, was supposed to > be crack shot and was called "the veteran" also supposed to been at the > battle of waterloo as a 16 year old. Any advice as to where to continue > researching would also be helpful. Vicki O'Reilly
Hello fellow jurors Beyond reasonable doubt NOT GUILTY but ..... Cheryl
Vicki would you believe, that I have O'Reilly, Stewart and Bell in my family. O'Reilly became Reilly, and married Ponchard in my line in Victoria. Stewart married HAyes Cooma and then Ponchard, Bell married Hadson Carcoar area. Kaye www.bananatv.com/genealogy ----- Original Message ----- From: "vicki o'reilly" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 9:32 AM Subject: ALEXANDER STEWART >
Hi i am new to the list and am not sure if i am in the right area. I am trying to track down any information on Alexander Stewart married Margaret Bell in 1844. He was a widower when this marriage took place. Family stories have him working in the Berry area and as being ex-military, was supposed to be crack shot and was called "the veteran" also supposed to been at the battle of waterloo as a 16 year old. Any advice as to where to continue researching would also be helpful Vicki O'Reilly _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail is now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/signup.asp
Dear Jury: Good Morning Australia. This is the tally so far: Guilty = 1 Not Guilty = 3 Jury, When you send your vote please identify yourself with your 1st name and juror #. Thank You.
GUILTY
Hello all, Not Guilty. Cheers, Rob.
NOT GUILTY
Hello AUS-NSW-SE-L, NOT GUILTY -- Best regards, Mel mailto:[email protected]
Hello AUS-NSW-SE-L, The Judge wants an email from each of us stating either "guilty" or "not guilty", just that, no explanations, zero, zilch. We cannot have a "hung" jury, the verdict must be unanimous. Those who have stated that RANDALL is guilty have done so on spurious grounds and should have a re-think along the lines that if it was you facing that court, how would you want the court to find you, on the glaring lack of evidence. Those of you who "don't know" is a "Not Guilty" verdict, as you imply you have reasonable doubt, and therefore the defendant must have the benefit of this. If you can all comply with this, then we will hear from the Judge. -- Best regards, Mel mailto:[email protected]
A great site - I have found my "lost" Nathan Dean - so thank you all for the effort expended Deb
wow I just visited this site http://mariners.records.nsw.gov.au Thanks Mary Ann it is brilliant Christene ----- Original Message ----- From: "Warner, MaryAnne" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:21 AM Subject: RE: AUS-NSW-SE-D Digest V03 #90 > Hi everyone > > Letting you know the Mariners and Ships in Australian Waters is > now in it's permanent home at > > http://mariners.records.nsw.gov.au > > 5,658 (as at 1st June) transcribed lists together with scans of > each list online FREE. > > Good luck finding CREW, unassisted Passengers, and other > incidental info. > > > > You are welcome to join with us to transcribe, a few or many, > more lists. > > > Mary-Anne > > http://www.ozlists.com > > ********************************************************************** > This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain > privileged information or confidential information or both. If you > are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender. > ********************************************************************** > > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 >
> JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN THE MATTER OF THE CROWN -V-RANDALL > > 1. Determine the case on its merits. > > 2. Be mindful of the charge "Guilty of intent to do Grievous Bodily > Harm." Intent is defined as a state of mind wherein the person knows and desires > the consequences of his actions which must exist at the time the offense was > committed However, in this case only GENERAL INTENT is required for a > finding of guilty. Which means the prosecutor does not have to prove the defendant > intended to injure his wife with exact injury to her head. He only need > prove defendant threw the object at her or used his hand to hit her. To prove > general intent it need only be proven the defendant took physical action > towards his wife. The prosecutor does not have to prove the exact injury was what > the defendant had in mind. > > 3. There are no qualified expert witness at this trial. The non-expert > cannot give an opinion regarding how Mrs. Randall was injured. However, Mrs. > Randall can give a statement as to how she was injured. > > 4. Any witness who testified as to what they were told is not allowed > unless they were present at the time of the event. > > 5. You must be of the opinion that the grievous bodily injury was > UNLAWFULLY committed. > > 6. You WILL NOT consider that the parties involved were drinking or under > the influence. The alleged action and the possible resulting injury need > only be considered. > > 7. Do not consider any testimony regarding John Randall. > > 8. Do not consider any testimony of the police officer. > > 9. Do not consider any testimony regarding defendants reputation or past > crimes. They are not relevant to this action. > > 10. You must decide which witness carries the most weight. > > 11. The prosecution is required to prove their case beyond a shadow of a > doubt. > > 12. In the alternative if you determine defendant injured Mrs. Randall but > did not intend to. You may find him guilty of gross negligence when > inflicting the injury. > > The Judge > >
Hi everyone Letting you know the Mariners and Ships in Australian Waters is now in it's permanent home at http://mariners.records.nsw.gov.au 5,658 (as at 1st June) transcribed lists together with scans of each list online FREE. Good luck finding CREW, unassisted Passengers, and other incidental info. You are welcome to join with us to transcribe, a few or many, more lists. Mary-Anne http://www.ozlists.com ********************************************************************** This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain privileged information or confidential information or both. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender. **********************************************************************
----- Original Message ----- From: "Neville Collins" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:04 AM Subject: Bathurst >> I have a cousin in England enquiring about Bathurst in its > goldmining days. > Can you tell me if there is a website with perhaps pictures > which may have this information. > > Hi Pat I dont know if any info would come up under Bathurst as such ?? http://www.historyhill.com.au/Hill_End_History.html http://www.uq.net.au/~zzdvande/sofala.html Just found these 2 via www.google.com.au Bye MargM Member of Central Coast FHS Gosford, NSW
I second Mel Looks like we've elected you Mel :) Penny Juror No. 10 ----- Original Message ----- From: "christene hartley" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 6:27 PM Subject: Re: Jury of 12 > I nominate Mel > hehahaheheah > Juror 5 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mel" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:44 PM > Subject: Jury of 12 > > > > Hello AUS-NSW-SE-L, > > > > Alright you lot! If you are not going to elect a foreman, and so > > far you haven't, I hereby elect myself in true democratic fashion. > > > > Anyone want to fight over it? > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Mel Grieveson, Melbourne mailto:[email protected] > > > > > > ============================== > > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, > go to: > > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > > > > ______________________________