MUDGEE DISTRICT COURT Wednesday, January 2, 1861 H DEAN v. P SULLIVAN TEMPLETON for plaintiff. This was an action for the recovery of £39, being the amount of a promissory note drawn in favour of W WILTON, and endorsed to the plaintiff. W WILTON swore to the handwriting of defendant. He had paid the bill away in the course of business, which was dishonoured. The defendant not appearing, a verdict was given for the amount. John HEALY v. BLOODSWORTH. Settled out of Court. FAIRFAX and Son v. E BAYLY This was an action for £13. The plaintiffs not knowing a Mudgee attorney addressed a letter to the Registrar of the Court expressing a wish hat the case might be transferred to Parramatta in consequence of the inconvenience it would occasion to send their books and clerks to Mudgee. His Honor refused the application, and the plaintiffs not appearing were nonsuited. REUBENS v. Catherine ROBINSON TEMPLETON for plaintiff. This was an action to recover the sum of £75 0s 11d being a balance due for store goods. Mr. REUBENS having been sworn, said that defendant admitted the debt, and had promised to give a 3 months' bill for the amount which he considered too long a time. Verdict that the amount, less £4 19s be paid forthwith. ***END*** Annette Piper (Please note: The above has been transcribed with care however an error may have inadvertently been made. Spelling is how it appears in original.)