Diane Does this account for some missing digest mailings? >From this list I have digest 161, 163 and 164, received when I arrived at work Thursday morning, missiong 162 The same for the Sydney list missing two in the midle of those received. The note below was received in digest 161 which arrived in my box either Wednesday evening or Thursday morning. Howard Newcastle Evening All, Just a reminder that we have been experiencing some minor delays with the 'mail' over the past few days, due to Rootsweb upgrading their servers to new hardware. Seems OK at the moment (some minor delays), so don't worry if your message does not appear on the list straight away ... it will eventually reach its destination (hopefully) ! Regards, Diane Admin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email, including any attachments, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or personal information and may also be the subject of legal privilege. Any personal information contained in this email is not to be used or disclosed for any purpose other than the purpose for which you have received it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. In this case, please let me know by return email, delete the message permanently from your system and destroy any copies. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Howard, I'm not sure about the Digest messages - but I have Digest #162 as being received (in my inbox) on 2nd July at 4.09. If you, or anyone else is missing any of the Digests, then let me know "off list" and I can forward it / them on if you want. It may eventually show up ! Due to Rootsweb moving servers and upgrading hardware, the mail has, at times, been delayed (sometimes up to 3-4 days) and this morning I received a whole lot a messages from a number of lists that I am sure I had already received and read .... weird ! A bit like dejavu :) The messages seem to be appearing in the archives OK - often before they actually appear on the list. For the moment anyway, I think it may be best if anyone who sends a message to the list does so - just once only - and just keep in mind that the message may appear on the list straight away, or it may take a few days to come through. Others may also ? be receiving duplicates, but hopefully it should all settle down soon (once they have the gremlins sorted out :) Regards, Diane (Admin) ----- Original Message ----- Subject: [H,H,HV] Delayed Mail and Rootsweb > Diane > Does this account for some missing digest mailings? > > From this list I have digest 161, 163 and 164, received when I arrived > at work Thursday morning, missiong 162 > The same for the Sydney list missing two in the midle of those received. > Howard > Newcastle