Hi Colleen, Mary was born Reed, then married ? Robinson, then married Ben Jackson. Ben's parents were John Jackson and Sarah Dean, of Rochdale, Lancs, who married in 1805, Ben was born there c1826, so there must have been lots of older siblings....Mary could have been a younger sister I suppose. She was 66yrs of age at death. Thanks, Robyn. On 20/01/2006, at 9:06 PM, Colleen Wells wrote: > Hi Robyn, > > Was Mary a JACKSON before she marred Benjamin JACKSON ?, maybe it is > Ben's sister, who were Ben's parents ? > > I will take a look in NSW for you. > > Colleen > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "francesco acciarito" > <fracc@ozemail.com.au> > To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 8:06 PM > Subject: [AUS-MELB] A mysterious burial > > >> Hi listers, I'm hoping SKS can help me solve a mystery that I have >> decided to have another go at after a few year's break. >> >> My Benjamin Dean JACKSON, died 1.2.1873, is buried in Melb. Gen. Cem. >> with 3 of his children, but there is also a mystery woman named Mary >> BURDETT there too, buried on 8.6.1896. Now, Ben's wife was Mary >> ROBINSON (nee Reed) who outlived him, and it's so easy to just assume >> that Mary married again to a ? BURDETT. I don't have CD's, in fact my >> IMac won't take them, so I had to trawl through fiche the long way >> but still could not find a marriage for a Mary JACKSON and a BURDETT. >> I realize this could have happened interstate, but why would she then >> be buried in Vic (IF this was her?) >> I guess what I need is a kind person with CD's to look for the >> marriage of Mary JACKSON and a BURDETT, post 1873, plus the death of >> Mary BURDETT in 1896. Mary JACKSON'S parents were William JACKSON >> and Esther STONE, so if Mary BURDETT'S parents are the same then >> Bingo! >> >> Thanks, Robyn of Geelong. >> >> >> ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== >> Searchable archives at >> http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=AUS- >> MELBOURNE-L >> >> ============================== >> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the >> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: >> http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > ==================================================== > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx >

Hi Carmel, thanks for your prompt lookup. That's her, and a real pity that her parents are unknown. There is no headstone, just a metal fence. Don't know where to go from here! cheers, Robyn. On 20/01/2006, at 9:25 PM, Carmel M Reynen wrote: > Here is her death but no parents mentioned. there is an age though > that may help > Digger - Federation Index. Victoria 1889-1901 > > > Query > ----- > Surname : Burdett (39 matches) > Given Names : Mary (54116 matches) > > Total matching records: 2 > -------------------- > > Surname: BURDETT > Given Names: Mary > Event: D > Sex: > Spouse Surname/Father: Unknown > Spouse Gvn Names/Mother: Unknown UNKNOWN > Age: 66 > Age Code: > Birth Place: > Death Place: Fitz S > Year: 1896 > Reg. Number: 5895 > > there does not seem to be a marriage for Mary Jackson (Robinson) to a > Burdett > does not seem to be a headstone either > > Carmel > ----- Original Message ----- From: "francesco acciarito" > <fracc@ozemail.com.au> > To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 8:06 PM > Subject: [AUS-MELB] A mysterious burial > > >> Hi listers, I'm hoping SKS can help me solve a mystery that I have >> decided to have another go at after a few year's break. >> >> My Benjamin Dean JACKSON, died 1.2.1873, is buried in Melb. Gen. Cem. >> with 3 of his children, but there is also a mystery woman named Mary >> BURDETT there too, buried on 8.6.1896. Now, Ben's wife was Mary >> ROBINSON (nee Reed) who outlived him, and it's so easy to just assume >> that Mary married again to a ? BURDETT. I don't have CD's, in fact my >> IMac won't take them, so I had to trawl through fiche the long way >> but still could not find a marriage for a Mary JACKSON and a BURDETT. >> I realize this could have happened interstate, but why would she then >> be buried in Vic (IF this was her?) >> I guess what I need is a kind person with CD's to look for the >> marriage of Mary JACKSON and a BURDETT, post 1873, plus the death of >> Mary BURDETT in 1896. Mary JACKSON'S parents were William JACKSON >> and Esther STONE, so if Mary BURDETT'S parents are the same then >> Bingo! >> >> Thanks, Robyn of Geelong. >> >> >> ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== >> Searchable archives at >> http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=AUS- >> MELBOURNE-L >> >> ============================== >> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the >> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: >> http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx >> > > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > ==================================================== > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx >

Robyn, if it was a public grave it is quite possible that the Mary buried there is no relation at all as it was common to use the same plot for other burials later. having said that I hope you find your Mary. regards Evelyn ----- Original Message ----- From: "francesco acciarito" <fracc@ozemail.com.au> To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 7:06 PM Subject: [AUS-MELB] A mysterious burial >

Thank you Betty, i will contact Historical society for advice on how to store Thanks again Pam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Betty Cheeseman" <ech39497@bigpond.net.au> To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 9:29 PM Subject: [AUS-MELB] Old newspapers > Pam, > if you keep your newspapers take care with storage.Mine were stored folded in a drawer and are now turning into confetti. They were printed 1894/1904 thogh so guess I can't complain > Betty > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > ==================================================== > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. > Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/235 - Release Date: 19/01/06 > >

Here is her death but no parents mentioned. there is an age though that may help Digger - Federation Index. Victoria 1889-1901 Query ----- Surname : Burdett (39 matches) Given Names : Mary (54116 matches) Total matching records: 2 -------------------- Surname: BURDETT Given Names: Mary Event: D Sex: Spouse Surname/Father: Unknown Spouse Gvn Names/Mother: Unknown UNKNOWN Age: 66 Age Code: Birth Place: Death Place: Fitz S Year: 1896 Reg. Number: 5895 there does not seem to be a marriage for Mary Jackson (Robinson) to a Burdett does not seem to be a headstone either Carmel ----- Original Message ----- From: "francesco acciarito" <fracc@ozemail.com.au> To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 8:06 PM Subject: [AUS-MELB] A mysterious burial > Hi listers, I'm hoping SKS can help me solve a mystery that I have decided > to have another go at after a few year's break. > > My Benjamin Dean JACKSON, died 1.2.1873, is buried in Melb. Gen. Cem. with > 3 of his children, but there is also a mystery woman named Mary BURDETT > there too, buried on 8.6.1896. Now, Ben's wife was Mary ROBINSON (nee > Reed) who outlived him, and it's so easy to just assume that Mary married > again to a ? BURDETT. I don't have CD's, in fact my IMac won't take them, > so I had to trawl through fiche the long way but still could not find a > marriage for a Mary JACKSON and a BURDETT. I realize this could have > happened interstate, but why would she then be buried in Vic (IF this was > her?) > I guess what I need is a kind person with CD's to look for the marriage of > Mary JACKSON and a BURDETT, post 1873, plus the death of Mary BURDETT in > 1896. Mary JACKSON'S parents were William JACKSON and Esther STONE, so if > Mary BURDETT'S parents are the same then Bingo! > > Thanks, Robyn of Geelong. > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > Searchable archives at > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=AUS-MELBOURNE-L > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > >

Hi Robyn, Was Mary a JACKSON before she marred Benjamin JACKSON ?, maybe it is Ben's sister, who were Ben's parents ? I will take a look in NSW for you. Colleen ----- Original Message ----- From: "francesco acciarito" <fracc@ozemail.com.au> To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 8:06 PM Subject: [AUS-MELB] A mysterious burial > Hi listers, I'm hoping SKS can help me solve a mystery that I have decided > to have another go at after a few year's break. > > My Benjamin Dean JACKSON, died 1.2.1873, is buried in Melb. Gen. Cem. with > 3 of his children, but there is also a mystery woman named Mary BURDETT > there too, buried on 8.6.1896. Now, Ben's wife was Mary ROBINSON (nee > Reed) who outlived him, and it's so easy to just assume that Mary married > again to a ? BURDETT. I don't have CD's, in fact my IMac won't take them, > so I had to trawl through fiche the long way but still could not find a > marriage for a Mary JACKSON and a BURDETT. I realize this could have > happened interstate, but why would she then be buried in Vic (IF this was > her?) > I guess what I need is a kind person with CD's to look for the marriage of > Mary JACKSON and a BURDETT, post 1873, plus the death of Mary BURDETT in > 1896. Mary JACKSON'S parents were William JACKSON and Esther STONE, so if > Mary BURDETT'S parents are the same then Bingo! > > Thanks, Robyn of Geelong. > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > Searchable archives at > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=AUS-MELBOURNE-L > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx >

Pam, if you keep your newspapers take care with storage.Mine were stored folded in a drawer and are now turning into confetti. They were printed 1894/1904 thogh so guess I can't complain Betty

Hi listers, I'm hoping SKS can help me solve a mystery that I have decided to have another go at after a few year's break. My Benjamin Dean JACKSON, died 1.2.1873, is buried in Melb. Gen. Cem. with 3 of his children, but there is also a mystery woman named Mary BURDETT there too, buried on 8.6.1896. Now, Ben's wife was Mary ROBINSON (nee Reed) who outlived him, and it's so easy to just assume that Mary married again to a ? BURDETT. I don't have CD's, in fact my IMac won't take them, so I had to trawl through fiche the long way but still could not find a marriage for a Mary JACKSON and a BURDETT. I realize this could have happened interstate, but why would she then be buried in Vic (IF this was her?) I guess what I need is a kind person with CD's to look for the marriage of Mary JACKSON and a BURDETT, post 1873, plus the death of Mary BURDETT in 1896. Mary JACKSON'S parents were William JACKSON and Esther STONE, so if Mary BURDETT'S parents are the same then Bingo! Thanks, Robyn of Geelong.

Thanks Paul Cheers Pam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Kean" <pauljkean@yahoo.com.au> To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:57 PM Subject: Re: [AUS-MELB] re old newspapers > Hi Pam, > > As a minimum, you should always keep the whole page > containing the notice. That way you still have the > date and page number. > > Keeping the whole paper is always useful for intests > sake if nothing else. > > ..Paul > > > --- Pam <pam2001@hotkey.net.au> wrote: > > > I have just come across some old newspapers dating > > 1949- 1952, they are > > yellowing with age and a bit dilapidated in some > > parts , i have found some > > death notices etc regarding our family, should i > > just cut out the notices > > and throw the rest of the paper out, or should i > > preserve the whole paper? > > any ideas welcome > > Cheers > > Pam > > > > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > > ==================================================== > > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > > > > ============================== > > Find your ancestors in the Birth, Marriage and Death > > Records. > > New content added every business day. Learn more: > > http://www.ancestry.com/s13964/rd.ashx > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! News: Get the latest news via video today! > http://au.news.yahoo.com/video/ > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > ==================================================== > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/06 > >

Thanks Jessie Cheers Pam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jessie Dee" <littler01@optusnet.com.au> To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 4:02 PM Subject: Re: [AUS-MELB] re old newspapers > go to office works they will have some thing right size to keep them in > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pam" <pam2001@hotkey.net.au> > To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 2:03 PM > Subject: Re: [AUS-MELB] re old newspapers > > > > Thank you > > Just wondering how to preserve them as they are large papers > > Pam > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Paul Kean" <pauljkean@yahoo.com.au> > > To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:57 PM > > Subject: Re: [AUS-MELB] re old newspapers > > > > > >> Hi Pam, > >> > >> As a minimum, you should always keep the whole page > >> containing the notice. That way you still have the > >> date and page number. > >> > >> Keeping the whole paper is always useful for intests > >> sake if nothing else. > >> > >> ..Paul > >> > >> > >> --- Pam <pam2001@hotkey.net.au> wrote: > >> > >> > I have just come across some old newspapers dating > >> > 1949- 1952, they are > >> > yellowing with age and a bit dilapidated in some > >> > parts , i have found some > >> > death notices etc regarding our family, should i > >> > just cut out the notices > >> > and throw the rest of the paper out, or should i > >> > preserve the whole paper? > >> > any ideas welcome > >> > Cheers > >> > Pam > >> > > >> > > >> > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > >> > ==================================================== > >> > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > >> > > >> > ============================== > >> > Find your ancestors in the Birth, Marriage and Death > >> > Records. > >> > New content added every business day. Learn more: > >> > http://www.ancestry.com/s13964/rd.ashx > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ____________________________________________________ > >> Do you Yahoo!? > >> Yahoo! News: Get the latest news via video today! > >> http://au.news.yahoo.com/video/ > >> > >> > >> ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > >> ==================================================== > >> Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > >> > >> ============================== > >> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > >> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/06 > >> > >> > > > > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > > ==================================================== > > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > > > > ============================== > > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. > > Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: > > 18/01/2006 > > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/2006 > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > Searchable archives at > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=AUS-MELBOURNE-L > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/06 > >

go to office works they will have some thing right size to keep them in ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pam" <pam2001@hotkey.net.au> To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 2:03 PM Subject: Re: [AUS-MELB] re old newspapers > Thank you > Just wondering how to preserve them as they are large papers > Pam > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Kean" <pauljkean@yahoo.com.au> > To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:57 PM > Subject: Re: [AUS-MELB] re old newspapers > > >> Hi Pam, >> >> As a minimum, you should always keep the whole page >> containing the notice. That way you still have the >> date and page number. >> >> Keeping the whole paper is always useful for intests >> sake if nothing else. >> >> ..Paul >> >> >> --- Pam <pam2001@hotkey.net.au> wrote: >> >> > I have just come across some old newspapers dating >> > 1949- 1952, they are >> > yellowing with age and a bit dilapidated in some >> > parts , i have found some >> > death notices etc regarding our family, should i >> > just cut out the notices >> > and throw the rest of the paper out, or should i >> > preserve the whole paper? >> > any ideas welcome >> > Cheers >> > Pam >> > >> > >> > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== >> > ==================================================== >> > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! >> > >> > ============================== >> > Find your ancestors in the Birth, Marriage and Death >> > Records. >> > New content added every business day. Learn more: >> > http://www.ancestry.com/s13964/rd.ashx >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> ____________________________________________________ >> Do you Yahoo!? >> Yahoo! News: Get the latest news via video today! >> http://au.news.yahoo.com/video/ >> >> >> ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== >> ==================================================== >> Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! >> >> ============================== >> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the >> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/06 >> >> > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > ==================================================== > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. > Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: > 18/01/2006 > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/2006

Thank you Just wondering how to preserve them as they are large papers Pam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Kean" <pauljkean@yahoo.com.au> To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:57 PM Subject: Re: [AUS-MELB] re old newspapers > Hi Pam, > > As a minimum, you should always keep the whole page > containing the notice. That way you still have the > date and page number. > > Keeping the whole paper is always useful for intests > sake if nothing else. > > ..Paul > > > --- Pam <pam2001@hotkey.net.au> wrote: > > > I have just come across some old newspapers dating > > 1949- 1952, they are > > yellowing with age and a bit dilapidated in some > > parts , i have found some > > death notices etc regarding our family, should i > > just cut out the notices > > and throw the rest of the paper out, or should i > > preserve the whole paper? > > any ideas welcome > > Cheers > > Pam > > > > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > > ==================================================== > > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > > > > ============================== > > Find your ancestors in the Birth, Marriage and Death > > Records. > > New content added every business day. Learn more: > > http://www.ancestry.com/s13964/rd.ashx > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! News: Get the latest news via video today! > http://au.news.yahoo.com/video/ > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > ==================================================== > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/06 > >

Hi Pam, As a minimum, you should always keep the whole page containing the notice. That way you still have the date and page number. Keeping the whole paper is always useful for intests sake if nothing else. ..Paul --- Pam <pam2001@hotkey.net.au> wrote: > I have just come across some old newspapers dating > 1949- 1952, they are > yellowing with age and a bit dilapidated in some > parts , i have found some > death notices etc regarding our family, should i > just cut out the notices > and throw the rest of the paper out, or should i > preserve the whole paper? > any ideas welcome > Cheers > Pam > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > ==================================================== > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > > ============================== > Find your ancestors in the Birth, Marriage and Death > Records. > New content added every business day. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13964/rd.ashx > > ____________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News: Get the latest news via video today! http://au.news.yahoo.com/video/

I have just come across some old newspapers dating 1949- 1952, they are yellowing with age and a bit dilapidated in some parts , i have found some death notices etc regarding our family, should i just cut out the notices and throw the rest of the paper out, or should i preserve the whole paper? any ideas welcome Cheers Pam

Thank you. Am usure I have this information. Thank you very much for all your help. Why the "beep" I didn't ask for help earlier, is beyond me. Instead of all this stress, I've put myself threw the last few months. Thank you ever so much. Happiness Peggy & Max Swan Hill researching, ABBOTT,BELL,BIDDISCOMBE,BLOXHAM,FELLOWS,MOORE, GIDDENS,PHIPPS,ROWLSTONE,BLOXHAM, Australia, & England

Hello Ian, I am researching Mitchells from Melbourne. Thomas and Charity arrived in Melbourne in 1849. children were Anne 14years Maria 9 years Jane 7 years Thomas (gr grandfather) 19years Elizabeth 23 years Mary 18 years. are these Mitchells the ones you are researching? regards Betty Christchurch NZ >From: "Research" <ianspe@iinet.net.au> >Reply-To: AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com >To: AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: [AUS-MELB] ROLL CALL >Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:12:29 +0800 > >G'day List. > >My research names > >NEWPORT - St Kilda, Melbourne >CHINNOCK - Clunes >CLAMPETT - Clunes >BLACKBURN - Melbourne >MITCHELL - Melbourne >SPRING - Warrnambool >FORD - Warrnambool > >Be happy to share details with anyone researching these families. > >Regards > > >Ian Spence >WA > >From: "Research" <ianspe@iinet.net.au> >Reply-To: AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com >To: AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: [AUS-MELB] ROLL CALL >Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:12:29 +0800 > >G'day List. > >My research names > >NEWPORT - St Kilda, Melbourne >CHINNOCK - Clunes >CLAMPETT - Clunes >BLACKBURN - Melbourne >MITCHELL - Melbourne >SPRING - Warrnambool >FORD - Warrnambool > >Be happy to share details with anyone researching these families. > >Regards > > >Ian Spence >WA > > >==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== >Searchable archives at >http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=AUS-MELBOURNE-L > >============================== >Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the >areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. >Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx > _________________________________________________________________ Need more speed? Get Xtra Broadband @ http://jetstream.xtra.co.nz/chm/0,,202853-1000,00.html

Peggy, You may have already seen what I've copied below before but just in case: Digger - Inquest Index. Victoria 1840 - 1985 Surname: BLOXHAM Given Names: Catherine Age: 49 Place: Heidelberg Year: 1857 Reference: 15 Sex: F Cause: Haemorrhage Stomach Occupation: Wife Inq Date: Nationality: Ship: Notes: Cheers Anne -----Original Message----- From: Max & Peggy [mailto:phe09177@bigpond.net.au] Sent: Thursday, 19 January 2006 8:43 AM To: AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [AUS-MELB] BLOXHAM Need help, with my BLOXHAM family. Im hopping someone could find a birth and death of William BLOXHAM. Son of Mathew Thomas & Catherine? William married Margaret MAHER. Dont know were. Have been told, all there children born possably Heidlberg, Vic. Kate born 1858, John 1859, Catherine 17/7/1861, died21/3/1949 (my gr Grand Mother.) Mary Ann 1863, Margaret 1865, Steven Thomas 1869 Andrew Peter 1871. I'd be greatfull for any help, with this family. Wishing all happiness Peggy & Max Swan Hill researching, ABBOTT,BELL,BIDDISCOMBE,BLOXHAM,FELLOWS,MOORE, GIDDENS,PHIPPS,ROWLSTONE,BLOXHAM, Australia, & England ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== ==================================================== Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! ==================================================== Searchable archives at http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=AUS-MELBOURNE-L ============================== Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/232 - Release Date: 17/01/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/2006

Hi, I think I must have sent my info direct to the List Administrator. So now I'm trying to get it on the List for other folk to read. Some of My ancestors and their siblings etc. are. ALL the SOUTHAM children, Emily Anne SOUTHAM born at the goldfields, 1873, died Melbourne 1941 who married Leopold Edgar ISAACS in 1891. Alice Susan SOUTHAM b. 1880, married Michael Henry OSWALD, 1898. I'm seeking descendants of their children, if any. Henry Herbert OSWALD b. 1900, died after 1938 in Melbourne. My MOther, Catherine Anne, born 1902, died 1961. I know about. There is another girl born AFTER Catherine Anne. Name Unknown. Ann Ruth SOUTHAM b. 1885, married 1901 to Frank De FRATUS. Amy Morton SOUTHAM b. 1888, married Walter RIDOUT/REDOUBT. There are 2 known children Ilma and Leona. One married WHITE. William Wing SOUTHAM, b 1891, Died 1941, Charles Harold LEWIS, died about 1963 in Melbourne, wife Maisie, and daughter born about 1059/1960. Mary Victories (nee VAUGHAN), Married WHEELER 1941, (widowed) then later re-married MILLINS. Thank you, Leona Smithurst -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/06

Hi All I am wondering if anyone knows of a children's home, hospital or residential care unit that operated in Sherbrooke in the 1950s. Any clues or hints would be most appreciated. Cheers Anne H. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/2006

Thanks Carmel. Will check. Evelyn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carmel M Reynen" <fcfibre1@bigpond.com> To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:26 PM Subject: Re: [AUS-MELB] marriage Mary Elizabeth Harding > Evelyn > tried but no can find. It is possible however that she went over the > border to NSW. > Carmel > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Evelyn Harding" <emh_37@qld.chariot.net.au> > To: <AUS-MELBOURNE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:15 PM > Subject: [AUS-MELB] marriage Mary Elizabeth Harding > > >> Mary Elizabeth HARDING was born 1892 at Beechworth. Can SKS help to find >> her marriage/death please. >> TIA >> Evelyn >> >> >> ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== >> ==================================================== >> Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! >> >> ============================== >> Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for >> ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: >> http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx >> >> > > > > ==== AUS-MELBOURNE Mailing List ==== > ==================================================== > Virus warnings are not to be sent to the List! > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. > Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: > 18/01/2006 > >