Having tried both of these foods (?) I can say they are both equally bad. I will only qualify that by saying I have not had the opportunity to try them in their native lands but they are both pretty strange. Patti ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jill Johnston" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 4:15 PM Subject: Re: [ARMSTRONG] haggis plus lutefisk? > I wonder if that reasoning fits Swedish lutefisk, as well... although there > are quite a number of Swedes who claim to like the stuff. I've never been > where it was, so no personal experience, but have heard that it's rather > gelatinous and very strong smelling. > > Jill in Washington state > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marilyn Otterson" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:57 AM > Subject: [ARMSTRONG] haggis > > > I don't think Scots > > really eat haggis much...I think it's more of a kind of old-fashioned dish > > that tourists equate with Scotland, a tradition that probably many Scots > > don't care for either. Haggis was a nutritious way to use up leftovers > > after a sheep was slaughtered. Thank goodness folks usually don't have to > > depend on it anymore. > > > > Cousin Marilyn (with one N) > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.12/461 - Release Date: 10/2/06 > >