Here is an important thing to consider, in this ongoing discussion of the Greene Co. Web pages. Materials such as cemetery transcriptions may not be copyrightable. They are only collections of facts, not creative works, and both federal statute, the U.S. Copyright Office, and the U.S. Supreme Court have made clear that facts are not in themselves copyrightable; there must be original and creative work involved. Mere "sweat of the brow" (i.e. we worked hard on it), the Supreme Court has written, is not enough evidence that *creativity* was involved. Nor can such simple arrangements as alphabetical order or chronological order be considered creative arrangements of facts. What I am trying to say is that no person or organization can hold copyright to the facts contained on the gravestones of cemeteries, and mere transcription of those facts does not create a copyrightable work. I would be glad to provide more information and sources on this legal point should anyone ask. -Steve