I received the same message. I thought maybe it was for library use only but was placed in the history/genealogy section. I am on a TexShare mailing list. I can ask there. Kay
Hi, Is there another AOLer here that uses the Tex Share Database?? I don't have a problem logging in to the census but can't get the EBSCO Texas Reference Center. Below is the message I get....... We have detected a change to your IP Address for the current session and we are unable to locate a valid EBSCO cookie. As a result we are unable to identify you as a legitimate user. Please log in again When I try to log in & its the 1st time I then get this message........ "You have entered an invalid User ID or Password. Please try again. (Error Code 101)" User ID & Password are valid!!! My library hasn't been able to help. Thanks for any help. Gay
Sharon, I too have been gettintg errors from aol and I believe it is with them but it could be adaware ad it comes up in the corner (lower right corner and then I have to sign back on. It is so annoying. I wonder what we can do about it? ew
In a message dated 7/19/2006 3:59:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, SJR1813@aol.com writes: I have had Ad-aware for quite awhile and never had a problem but now, every time I run a scan, then I have a really difficult time getting AOL to load. Sharon- Are you trying to load AOL WHILE a scan is in process? Perhaps you are over-using limited resources? Joan
Hi, I wonder if anyone else is having this problem. I have had Ad-aware for quite awhile and never had a problem but now, every time I run a scan, then I have a really difficult time getting AOL to load. It takes several minutes and sometimes I have to re-start the computer. I have Windows 98SE. I don't know if that could be part of the problem or not. Any ideas appreciated! Sharon R
In a message dated 7/18/2006 11:25:36 AM Eastern Standard Time, ACMBJC@aol.com writes: Question. How do we sub to the list to receive in the "HTML" version? TIA. Marybeth C. Marybeth- You cannot subscribe to the RootsWeb lists in HTML format nor is the RootsWeb Review available in HTML format (as yet). However, if you subscribe to the Ancestry Weekly Journal you can elect to receive it in HTML format by selecting that setting here: http://newsletters.rootsweb.com/. Joan
Question. How do we sub to the list to receive in the "HTML" version? TIA. Marybeth C. acmbjc@aol.com ==================================================== In a message dated 7/17/06 1:01:38 PM, AOLers-RootsWeb-D-request@rootsweb.com writes: << Yes, Joan. I subbed to it in html and received it that way, ungarbled. Sharon Dulcich >>
Joan, Readable all the way to the bottom....YEA!!!!!! Emma In a message dated 7/17/2006 11:14:36 A.M. Central Standard Time, JYoung6180@aol.com writes: The Journal arrived in a readable format this week--my only question is did anyone who is subbed in HTML mode actually receive the HTML version and, if so, was it also readable and with no garbling at the bottom? Joan
In a message dated 7/17/2006 5:28:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, Nlment@aol.com writes: I get mine in HTML and received it, in tact, all the way to the end. I must be special. <g> I am subbed in HTML mode (I checked My Account both on the Ancestry side AND the RootsWeb side and BOTH have HTML checked off). My copy continued to arrive in plain text. Joan
I get mine in HTML and received it, in tact, all the way to the end. In a message dated 7/17/2006 10:01:37 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, AOLers-RootsWeb-D-request@rootsweb.com writes: The Journal arrived in a readable format this week--my only question is did anyone who is subbed in HTML mode actually receive the HTML version and, if so, was it also readable and with no garbling at the bottom?
In a message dated 7/17/2006 9:14:36 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, JYoung6180@aol.com writes: The Journal arrived in a readable format this week--my only question is did anyone who is subbed in HTML mode actually receive the HTML version and, if so, was it also readable and with no garbling at the bottom? .............. Joan, My Ancestry Weekly came just fine this time, no garbling at the bottom, and pictures came through fine to. Using 8.0 plus and get my Newsletter in HTML. Nancy O.
I am subbed in HTML and I received a readable no garbled HTML (I think) version. Vonda In a message dated 7/17/2006 11:14:33 A.M. Central Standard Time, JYoung6180@aol.com writes: The Journal arrived in a readable format this week--my only question is did anyone who is subbed in HTML mode actually receive the HTML version and, if so, was it also readable and with no garbling at the bottom? Joan
In a message dated 7/17/2006 9:14:36 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, JYoung6180@aol.com writes: The Journal arrived in a readable format this week--my only question is did anyone who is subbed in HTML mode actually receive the HTML version and, if so, was it also readable and with no garbling at the bottom? --------------- Yes, Joan. I subbed to it in html and received it that way, ungarbled. Sharon Dulcich
In a message dated 7/17/2006 12:14:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, JYoung6180@aol.com writes: The Journal arrived in a readable format this week--my only question is did anyone who is subbed in HTML mode actually receive the HTML version and, if so, was it also readable and with no garbling at the bottom? Joan Came in perfect Sharon
In a message dated 7/17/2006 12:09:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, sharonmc2002@aol.com writes: Hope I'm not the only one who got the real thing this week<G> Sharon The Journal arrived in a readable format this week--my only question is did anyone who is subbed in HTML mode actually receive the HTML version and, if so, was it also readable and with no garbling at the bottom? Joan
Hope I'm not the only one who got the real thing this week<G> Sharon
In a message dated 7/17/2006 12:14:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, JYoung6180@aol.com writes: The Journal arrived in a readable format this week--my only question is did anyone who is subbed in HTML mode actually receive the HTML version and, if so, was it also readable and with no garbling at the bottom? Joan: I think mine did and I sent it to you separately. Virginia Green
Joan, Yes, I was receiving in HTML
In a message dated 7/15/2006 10:56:34 AM Eastern Standard Time, Gerri1936@aol.com writes: about a week ago I went w/Cable High speed with a o l email ... Since then I have not been able to send most Graphics in the text of my emails... with no help to solve the problem from A O L ... I do not know if this may have anthing to do with it or not ... but I ran a : Network Diagnostics Scan xp version 5.1.2600 9.0 aol This was my results of the scan Network Adapters .... Failed 00000001 - SIS 900 - based Pci Fast Ethernet Adapter ..... failed 00589827 - Wan Miniport ( ip ) ... Failed Could someone give me some help , and do I need to correct this ??? and does it have anything to do with me sending embedded graphics ... I do not like to do attachments , the people who I send emails, seem to have problems w/attachments ... I like to just embed them and they can see it and know if they want to save them Thanks in advance for your help ... I always seem to learn so much from this helpful group .. Gerri Mason OhiO Gerri- I'm thinking maybe you might gete a better answer to this from the techies on the SENIOR-NEWBIE list--but I'd not think changing how you ACCESS AOL should have any effect on how you can send and receive your email. The only difference is that it should all be faster now. Are you saying you can USE AOL and send and receive email, but just not embed graphics in an email you want to send? Joan
about a week ago I went w/Cable High speed with a o l email ... Since then I have not been able to send most Graphics in the text of my emails... with no help to solve the problem from A O L ... I do not know if this may have anthing to do with it or not ... but I ran a : Network Diagnostics Scan xp version 5.1.2600 9.0 aol This was my results of the scan Network Adapters .... Failed 00000001 - SIS 900 - based Pci Fast Ethernet Adapter ..... failed 00589827 - Wan Miniport ( ip ) ... Failed Could someone give me some help , and do I need to correct this ??? and does it have anything to do with me sending embedded graphics ... I do not like to do attachments , the people who I send emails, seem to have problems w/attachments ... I like to just embed them and they can see it and know if they want to save them Thanks in advance for your help ... I always seem to learn so much from this helpful group .. Gerri Mason OhiO