Huntersglenn wrote: >[...].the likelihood of the government or an insurance >company knowing about the DNA genealogy testing isn't all that great. >IF either entity wanted my DNA that badly, they'd most likely opt to get >it directly from me, or from my house, or my doctor. [...] An insurance company might be as interested in the ages at and causes of death of one's last three generations of ancestors.

cecilia wrote: > Huntersglenn wrote: > >>[...].the likelihood of the government or an insurance >>company knowing about the DNA genealogy testing isn't all that great. >>IF either entity wanted my DNA that badly, they'd most likely opt to get >>it directly from me, or from my house, or my doctor. [...] > > > An insurance company might be as interested in the ages at and causes > of death of one's last three generations of ancestors. Another reason not to put too much on line? (g) Cheryl

singhals wrote: > cecilia wrote: > >> Huntersglenn wrote: >> >>> [...].the likelihood of the government or an insurance company >>> knowing about the DNA genealogy testing isn't all that great. IF >>> either entity wanted my DNA that badly, they'd most likely opt to get >>> it directly from me, or from my house, or my doctor. [...] >> >> >> >> An insurance company might be as interested in the ages at and causes >> of death of one's last three generations of ancestors. > > > Another reason not to put too much on line? (g) irrelevant your own private knowledge is what counts any "pre-existing medical condition" must be revealed Hugh W -- For genealogy and help with family and local history in Bristol and district http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Brycgstow/ http://snaps4.blogspot.com/ photographs and walks GENEALOGE http://hughw36.blogspot.com/ MAIN BLOG

cecilia wrote: > Huntersglenn wrote: > >>[...].the likelihood of the government or an insurance >>company knowing about the DNA genealogy testing isn't all that great. >>IF either entity wanted my DNA that badly, they'd most likely opt to get >>it directly from me, or from my house, or my doctor. [...] > > > An insurance company might be as interested in the ages at and causes > of death of one's last three generations of ancestors. and undisclosed data may invalidate a later claim read the contract of insurance very carefully before you sign it Hugh W -- For genealogy and help with family and local history in Bristol and district http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Brycgstow/ http://snaps4.blogspot.com/ photographs and walks GENEALOGE http://hughw36.blogspot.com/ MAIN BLOG

On Dec 10, 7:15 am, my...@ic24.net (cecilia) wrote: > Huntersglenn wrote: > >[...].the likelihood of the government or an insurance > >company knowing about the DNA genealogy testing isn't all that great. > >IF either entity wanted my DNA that badly, they'd most likely opt to get > >it directly from me, or from my house, or my doctor. [...] > > An insurance company might be as interested in the ages at and causes > of death of one's last three generations of ancestors. at the amount of profit insurance companies have reported to be bank rolling ... do we actually think they are paying someone to be trolling the internet searching for the limited amount of gedcom files listing that sort of info ... LOL Ken - hdpth-DNA