"Ray" <rayj.balt@DELTHISverizon.net> wrote: > > But I suspect as time goes on, if the palpable errors on the site > could be corrected, its usefulness will grow. > > -- Ray > I agree with that, for sure. It's been a while since I used them for tree info (basically gave up on ALL of them, like I mentioned) and the Ancestry.com/Genealogy.com/Rootsweb trees would be improved as well as useful if there were more cited sources and even better posting dates! So many seem to be built with layer upon layer of outdated & wrong previous trees. That's why I'm such a big fan of any sort of XML data standard and/or software like FTM 2008 that makes it easy for people to actually make & distribute trees with cites. At least Ancestry tree "matches" will show some of the source trees that they use when building their OneWorld tree so you can decide if it's credible info. It's all a mess, but I think it's slowly going the right direction.