RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 3/3
    1. Re: genealogy.com
    2. JD <jd4x4@<del.this>verizon.net> wrote: > I asked Ancestry help recently (last 2 weeks, maybe?) about their intent My brain must be in a time-warp. I looked and I asked the question on Nov 15! But, I just asked again on live help and they said that they "do not know, but have not heard of any plans to do that". I suppose I should have asked if they were closing the site, rather than just adding the CD-based data to Ancestry... but I didn't. :-(

    01/03/2008 07:50:53
    1. Re: genealogy.com
    2. Hugh Watkins
    3. JD <jd4x4@ wrote: > JD <jd4x4@<del.this>verizon.net> wrote: > > >>I asked Ancestry help recently (last 2 weeks, maybe?) about their intent > > > My brain must be in a time-warp. I looked and I asked the question on Nov > 15! But, I just asked again on live help and they said that they "do not > know, but have not heard of any plans to do that". > > I suppose I should have asked if they were closing the site, rather than > just adding the CD-based data to Ancestry... but I didn't. :-( I believe the CDs contain the same data as Woldconnect.rootsweb.com can anyone plaese make some test searches also of AWT and OWT which share some data too Hugh W -- For genealogy and help with family and local history in Bristol and district http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Brycgstow/ http://snaps4.blogspot.com/ photographs and walks GENEALOGE http://hughw36.blogspot.com/ MAIN BLOG

    01/03/2008 04:27:45
    1. Re: genealogy.com
    2. Sherlock Holmes
    3. JD <jd4x4@ wrote: > JD <jd4x4@<del.this>verizon.net> wrote: > >> I asked Ancestry help recently (last 2 weeks, maybe?) about their intent > > My brain must be in a time-warp. I looked and I asked the question on Nov > 15! But, I just asked again on live help and they said that they "do not > know, but have not heard of any plans to do that". > > I suppose I should have asked if they were closing the site, rather than > just adding the CD-based data to Ancestry... but I didn't. :-( Hi, The exact phrase used was that it is being fazed out which in turn means will not be used at some latter date. It was apparent that they are unwilling to spend any money on fixing up issues concerning the Genealogy.com website. Pity they do not communicate within their own outfit seems the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing. Case in point is that while I was getting my subscription to the WFT's canceled they in turn then canceled my free subscription with Ancestry.Com so the argument of having to subscribe to Genealogy.com for one service and Ancestry.com for another does no any longer hold water. I did not ask for my Free subscription to be canceled by the way. David

    01/04/2008 01:28:06