On Thursday 11 November 2010 10:39, Peter J. Seymour (Newsgroups@pjsey.demon.co.uk) opined: <snip> >> Peter, >> >> All I can say is that you should read the article if you haven't >> already. Most of the points you raise seem to be covered, although I >> have to say >> I'm not optimistic that anything will come of the effort. Thought folks >> might be interested. >> >> Short Ol' Bob >> > Bob, > Well I did skim it but perhaps didn't read it enthusiatically enough. > But you are correct - it is of interest and thanks for mentioning it. > > Peter And I must apologize for being snarky - had about a dozen things going at once and am increasingly finding myself having problems multi-tasking. Anyway, my point was that the move itself is interesting in that it seems(!!!) to be different from others earlier. I'm not inclined to hold my breath waiting on results, however. Sorry Ol' Bob -- Robert G. Melson | Rio Grande MicroSolutions | El Paso, Texas ----- The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the noblest causes -- Thomas Paine

On 11-11-2010 21:16, Bob Melson wrote: > Anyway, my point was that the move itself is interesting in that it > seems(!!!) to be different from others earlier. I'm not inclined to hold Someone on another forum, regarding the same article, said > We can but hope... > > But this comment from one of its instigators is very telling > already "I think I just don't know the ins and outs as well > as I thought I did." -- Wes Groleau "Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." — Aaron Levenstein