On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:19:00 -0400, Michael Kenefick <kenefick@copper.net> wrote: >Are the New York records missing a large number of people? did >something happen to the New York 1910 records in particular? > Has Ancestry got anything in the explanatory notes to the 1910 census? They usually go into fairly local detail in the notes to the various censuses in Great Britain (e.g. lists of "missing" parishes in Cheshire in 1841).