Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 3460/10000
    1. Re: Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. Lesley Robertson
    3. "Albert Conklin" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected] >> > Yes, like what D. Stussy said. I use Family Tree Maker and I guess the > only draw back to it is there is no place to list a divorce date. A bit > annoying to do the Calendar and also see listed multiple anniversaries for > the same person with a different spouse. > Albert I have FTM 2005, and it has a category for Divorce. I'm sure it was in the earlier versions. Go to [Marriage Facts] (the box with a pencil on it beside the space for [marriage place], click [add fact] and select Divorce from the list that comes up. Going to [help] and searching on divorce is also helpful. lesley Robertson

    07/16/2009 06:52:09
    1. Re: Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. Steve Hayes
    3. On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:31:32 -0400, "Percival P. Cassidy" <[email protected]> wrote: >D. Stussy wrote: > >>> Is there consensus on how to record plural "wives" and their children? >>> Call them wives, or "partners" or ...? >> >> Is there actually a problem here? Some people do marry multiple times >> during a lifetime. Therefore, most if not all genealogy programs accept >> multiple spouses. >> >> Now, if you are saying that your program won't allow you to enter two >> spouses with overlapping marriage periods (e.g. marriages without >> termination by divorce or death), you need a better program. > >I was merely wondering whether it was customary to limit the term "wife" >to a legally recognized relationship. Sometimes they are legally recognised. Our president is polygamous, and his wives are legally recognised. -- Steve Hayes Web: http://hayesgreene.wordpress.com/ http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/famhist1.htm http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7783/

    07/16/2009 03:16:07
    1. People finders
    2. Edward Hutchison
    3. Many of you have kindly offered to help various posters and I thought I would ask a similar favor. For a number of years I have maintained online alumni records for ten classes at my old high school near Syracuse, (see http://ehutchison.homestead.com/list.html). I also have compiled brief biographies on several thousand families that lived in my hometown circa WWII. (see http://www.erhutchison.com/FayettevilleRegistry.html) In tracking down my old chums and neighbors, I use Ancestry, Genealogy Bank, Newspaper Archive, Fulton History (for local newspaper articles), SSDI, Syracuse University alumni database, Long Lost People (now a part of the Ancestry organization), RootsWeb, and Find-A-Grave. I'm sure most of you are familiar with many of these resources, but I wondered if anyone could suggest some other "people locator" service or other database that would be worthwhile. I appreciate any help you might have time to give. Edward Hutchison Madison, MS www.ERHutchison.com

    07/16/2009 03:07:45
    1. RSL: New O Surnames, June 2009 Update
    2. RootsWeb Surname List
    3. June 2009 Update to RootsWeb Surname List New and Modified Surnames starting with O - To learn more about the RSL, including how to access the full RSL which has over a million surnames (these postings are only the NEW or CHANGED names). how to submit surnames, etc., visit http://rsl.rootsweb.com/ - Write directly to the submitter if you would like to exchange information. Entries are formatted as follows: Surname Date1 Date2 Migration Comments & Nametag Surname: The surname being researched Date1: The earliest date for which the submitter has information. Date2: The most recent date. Migration: Where people of this line lived during the period listed. Comments: Additional information (not always included) Nametag: What you need to actually contact the submitter. Abbreviations used in the migration are listed on this web page: http://helpdesk.rootsweb.com/codes/ OK, so you see a surname listed below and want to share and compare with the person who submitted it. How do you find the submitter? It's not all that bad: to obtain the address info for the submitter whose nametag is "example" (just for example), go here: http://rsl.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/rslsql.cgi?op=user&user=example Reminder: the nametag is the last word on each line in the list below. ===================================== 2 July 2009 O'Brien 1840 TIP, IRL Freagh, Newport, Tipperary dacca90 O'Brien 1930 1940 Ohio missing since 1930 Patrick, AKA Paddy, Patty Katt9 O'Dannell 1860 1870 GA>AL,USA Mary Louise wife of Millard Hill Zuber mpline O'Neal 1852 now GA>FL,USA Joel Britton O'Neal married Ida Manning mpline Oakley 1708 1902 Orsett,ESS,ENG moorejo Oaks 1850 1930 OH>IN>OH>IN peglr Oberembt WI SD Ethan, SD area Anna Schumacher Oberembt richgood Ogilvie 1855 1906 SCO>AUST ANDREW JAMESON migrated c1872 to Western Australia RonnieG Olesdatter 1600 2009 Denmark, Australia, USA corelli Olesen 1600 2009 Denmark, Australia, USA corelli Oliver 1800 now VA>SC>GA, USA African-American Olivers from Lize(?) Plantation singcl Olsen 1905 1930 Norway<New York Looking for Mary or Martha Mother of David Olson Jr. DOB 01/29/1943 adopted in Manhattan NY. Grandfather - David Olson father was Italian Longshoreman in 1943. bmcelroy Olson 1905 1930 Norway<New York Looking for Mary or Martha Mother of David Olson Jr. DOB 01/29/1943 adopted in Manhattan NY. Grandfather - David Olson father was Italian Longshoreman in 1943. bmcelroy Oostrum 1400 now Netherlands,United States vroegh Ott 1659 2009 Baden aplayko See directions at the top of this message for information on how to retrieve the submitters' contact information.

    07/16/2009 02:10:01
    1. ~ USPS TEST ~
    2. Higbee Restivo
    3. ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* ENTER HERE: >>> http://your-guide-online.com/about/usps-test <<< ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . usps 470 battery test usps tap test usps asp 600.10 test usps 943 test book practice tests for usps usps average test scores usps carrier test trumbull county ohio free usps pratice test usps tests for employees in nc usps et test usps custodial 916 test usps employment test prepare for usps tests free usps 710 practice test usps window clerk training test career prep usps test usps test results usps employment tests study for usps tests failed drug test for usps usps sales associate test usps test scores usps take test 473 usps carrier test usps sample test for employment usps road test electronics technician test for usps usps rural carrier test usps mail carrier test results usps test 460 usps window clerk in service test usps test oklahoma usps test exam usps sample tests usps pratice test usps sample test usps 932 test free usps clerk test usps test 922 usps test results list usps window clerk test usps tests usps test mail reporter usps job test free usps practice test usps label test print usps custodial test 916 contents usps test usps 932 test length usps tests careers america usps engine maintenance test usps pre employment tests usps test schedule usps test administration center albany ny usps practice typing test 473 pratice usps test free usps employment test tips usps test 473 usps 943 test failed drug test for usps disqualified drug test usps usps 932 test time usps merlin test free usps test

    07/15/2009 08:28:52
    1. TICK TOCK: Using Internet Research "Clocks"
    2. JacobSmith
    3. TICK TOCK: Using Internet Research "Clocks" In these severe economic times, it is refreshing to find resources that can aid researching data on the Internet. For example, What's New in Genealogy & Family History Resources? has http://www.academic-genealogy.com/whatsnewingenealogyfamilyhistory.htm at the top of the page under current information: . . . DAILY TREE ROOT INFORMATION: "family history" - Google Search and genealogy - Google Search. All results are shown with more text for the past 24 hours, as sorted by date, using standard view. Insert other keywords for a perpetual moment by moment daily review of anything, such as surnames, organizations, locations, etc. Another "tick tock" clock can be found at Surname Newsgroups: Blogs, Genealogy Newsletters and Periodicals, by going to sub site: Blogs - Searching the Internet. http://tinyurl.com/nsbt9d Here, BlogPulse provides current searches for content posted on weblogs or blogs. Open it daily to discover the people, issues, blogs, posts, commentaries, tidbits and news that bloggers are discussing, as well as the bloggers names. As of this posting, current Total identified blogs: 112,597,777 New blogs in last 24 hours: 106,543 BlogPulse is an excellent search addition to social networking resources for family trees, and can provide ongoing contacts for various types of genealogy and family organizations. http://tinyurl.com/nfzedm Schools - Colleges - Universities: Alumni and Genealogy Education provides global comprehensive resources for educational institutions and their genealogy and family history data, past and present students, alumni, associations, faculty, friends and military personnel. http://www.academic-genealogy.com/schoolscollegesuniversities.htm This currently updated site "tick tocks" the real status report for the professional community; the state of the art for peer acceptability. Combine with current information from Libraries and Museums, using LibGuides. http://www.academic-genealogy.com/librariesmuseums.htm There are now 42,035 guides by 12,649 librarians at 766 libraries worldwide. Respectfully yours, V. Chris & Tom Tinney, Sr. http://www.academic-genealogy.com/ Family Genealogy & History Internet Education Directory: Scholarly mega site map of world wide Internet resources.

    07/15/2009 04:00:12
    1. Re: Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. Percival P. Cassidy
    3. [email protected] wrote: >> Is there consensus on how to record plural "wives" and their children? >> Call them wives, or "partners" or ...? > Why do you put "wives" in quotes? > Are you talking about women not legally married to the fathers of > their children? > > Jurisdiction and culture also play a role so there is no "one size > fits all" solution. Yes, I am referring particularly to "wives" in polygamous breakaway sects from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day-Saints (LDS, Mormons). Neither the official LDS nor the various US states where these breakaway sects flourish recognize such polygamous marriages, but the states intervene only when the girls are too young to give consent (legally) to sexual intercourse; to the best of my knowledge that is 16, but it may vary from state to state. (I recall that when Jerry Lee Lewis toured Britain in the 1950s there was an uproar because he was accompanied by his 13-yr.-old wife, who also happened to be his cousin -- legal in their state of residence, whichever that was.) Perce

    07/15/2009 03:14:56
    1. Re: Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. Steve Hayes
    3. On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:10:58 -0400, "Percival P. Cassidy" <[email protected]> wrote: >Is there consensus on how to record plural "wives" and their children? >Call them wives, or "partners" or ...? It's usual to call them wives. -- Steve Hayes Web: http://hayesgreene.wordpress.com/ http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/famhist1.htm http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7783/

    07/15/2009 02:44:56
    1. Re: Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. Bruce Remick
    3. "Albert Conklin" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected] > D. Stussy wrote: >> "Percival P. Cassidy" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected] >>> Is there consensus on how to record plural "wives" and their children? >>> Call them wives, or "partners" or ...? >> >> Is there actually a problem here? Some people do marry multiple times >> during a lifetime. Therefore, most if not all genealogy programs accept >> multiple spouses. >> >> Now, if you are saying that your program won't allow you to enter two >> spouses with overlapping marriage periods (e.g. marriages without >> termination by divorce or death), you need a better program. >> >> > Yes, like what D. Stussy said. I use Family Tree Maker and I guess the > only draw back to it is there is no place to list a divorce date. A bit > annoying to do the Calendar and also see listed multiple anniversaries for > the same person with a different spouse. > Albert Isn't that where Notes becomes valuable? I always put an explanation in there whenever a name-date-relationship situation becomes confusing.

    07/15/2009 01:51:56
    1. Re: Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. Percival P. Cassidy
    3. Bob Melson wrote: >>>> Is there consensus on how to record plural "wives" and their children? >>>> Call them wives, or "partners" or ...? >>> Is there actually a problem here? Some people do marry multiple times >>> during a lifetime. Therefore, most if not all genealogy programs accept >>> multiple spouses. >>> >>> Now, if you are saying that your program won't allow you to enter two >>> spouses with overlapping marriage periods (e.g. marriages without >>> termination by divorce or death), you need a better program. >> I was merely wondering whether it was customary to limit the term "wife" >> to a legally recognized relationship. > Depends on _where_, don't you think? There are still places where multiple > wives are permitted, even encouraged. I suppose my question of you is: > who decides what is/isn't legal? I just want to do what is customary among genealogical researchers -- so that, if at some point I decide to put my findings on line for others to use, I will not be recording relationships in a way that will confuse others. Perce

    07/15/2009 01:46:45
    1. Re: Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. On Jul 15, 1:10 pm, "Percival P. Cassidy" <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there consensus on how to record plural "wives" and their children? > Call them wives, or "partners" or ...? > > Perce Why do you put "wives" in quotes? Are you talking about women not legally married to the fathers of their children? Jurisdiction and culture also play a role so there is no "one size fits all" solution.

    07/15/2009 11:45:53
    1. Re: Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. Albert Conklin
    3. D. Stussy wrote: > "Percival P. Cassidy" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected] >> Is there consensus on how to record plural "wives" and their children? >> Call them wives, or "partners" or ...? > > Is there actually a problem here? Some people do marry multiple times > during a lifetime. Therefore, most if not all genealogy programs accept > multiple spouses. > > Now, if you are saying that your program won't allow you to enter two > spouses with overlapping marriage periods (e.g. marriages without > termination by divorce or death), you need a better program. > > Yes, like what D. Stussy said. I use Family Tree Maker and I guess the only draw back to it is there is no place to list a divorce date. A bit annoying to do the Calendar and also see listed multiple anniversaries for the same person with a different spouse. Albert

    07/15/2009 09:58:31
    1. Re: Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. Percival P. Cassidy
    3. D. Stussy wrote: >> Is there consensus on how to record plural "wives" and their children? >> Call them wives, or "partners" or ...? > > Is there actually a problem here? Some people do marry multiple times > during a lifetime. Therefore, most if not all genealogy programs accept > multiple spouses. > > Now, if you are saying that your program won't allow you to enter two > spouses with overlapping marriage periods (e.g. marriages without > termination by divorce or death), you need a better program. I was merely wondering whether it was customary to limit the term "wife" to a legally recognized relationship. Perce

    07/15/2009 09:31:32
    1. Re: Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. Bob Melson
    3. On Wednesday 15 July 2009 13:31, Percival P. Cassidy ([email protected]) opined: > D. Stussy wrote: > >>> Is there consensus on how to record plural "wives" and their children? >>> Call them wives, or "partners" or ...? >> >> Is there actually a problem here? Some people do marry multiple times >> during a lifetime. Therefore, most if not all genealogy programs accept >> multiple spouses. >> >> Now, if you are saying that your program won't allow you to enter two >> spouses with overlapping marriage periods (e.g. marriages without >> termination by divorce or death), you need a better program. > > I was merely wondering whether it was customary to limit the term "wife" > to a legally recognized relationship. > > Perce Depends on _where_, don't you think? There are still places where multiple wives are permitted, even encouraged. I suppose my question of you is: who decides what is/isn't legal? Stumped Ol' Bob -- Robert G. Melson | Rio Grande MicroSolutions | El Paso, Texas ----- A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have. Thomas Jefferson

    07/15/2009 08:20:35
    1. Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. Percival P. Cassidy
    3. Is there consensus on how to record plural "wives" and their children? Call them wives, or "partners" or ...? Perce

    07/15/2009 08:10:58
    1. Re: The Birth Certificate Thing
    2. John Galt
    3. Steve Hayes wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:05:52 -0500, John Galt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I always thought this whole thing was kind of specious, but if they want >> it to go away, at some point the government needs to stop sending >> signals that it could be true. > > Who cares? Quite a few people, with more than a few court challenges on this issue still winding their way through our legal system. > > Other than you, of course, and if you do, try alt.genealogy. Lots of fundis > about birth certificates there. I'm sure there are. Those, however, aren't issues that deal with national Constitutions. Perhaps you are unable to discern the difference between the two. JG

    07/15/2009 08:01:44
    1. Re: Relationships in polygamous "families?"
    2. D. Stussy
    3. "Percival P. Cassidy" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected] > Is there consensus on how to record plural "wives" and their children? > Call them wives, or "partners" or ...? Is there actually a problem here? Some people do marry multiple times during a lifetime. Therefore, most if not all genealogy programs accept multiple spouses. Now, if you are saying that your program won't allow you to enter two spouses with overlapping marriage periods (e.g. marriages without termination by divorce or death), you need a better program.

    07/15/2009 05:34:25
    1. THUMB SUPPORT
    2. McClees Brymer
    3. ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* ENTER HERE: >>> http://your-guide-online.com/about/thumb-support <<< ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . wrist thumb support logitech software with thumb button support smart glove with thumb support rolyan takeoff thumb supports support thumb pull on orthopedic thumb supports thumb and wrist supports thumb support splint thumb support for snowmobiling thumb book holder support snowmobile thumb support low profile thumb support prolite thumb support snowmobile thumb throttle supports canada rolyan neoprene pull on thumb support diy thumb supports support thumb neoprene thumb supports wrist thumb support bc wrist brace with thumb support ldt wrist thumb support thumb thing thumb and wrist support pediatric wrist and thumb support glove thumb spica support arthritic thumb support wrist and thumb supports thumb support stabilizer dos usb support thumb drive pull-on neoprene thumb supports thumb support glove thumb wrist support universal thumb support rule of thumb for child support arthritis thumb support thumb support canada thumb supports futuro thumb support hand wrist thumb support thumb support ms media center support green thumb magnetic therapy thumb support cmo thumb supports thumb splints or thumb supports

    07/15/2009 03:46:25
    1. RSL: New N Surnames, June 2009 Update
    2. RootsWeb Surname List
    3. June 2009 Update to RootsWeb Surname List New and Modified Surnames starting with N - To learn more about the RSL, including how to access the full RSL which has over a million surnames (these postings are only the NEW or CHANGED names). how to submit surnames, etc., visit http://rsl.rootsweb.com/ - Write directly to the submitter if you would like to exchange information. Entries are formatted as follows: Surname Date1 Date2 Migration Comments & Nametag Surname: The surname being researched Date1: The earliest date for which the submitter has information. Date2: The most recent date. Migration: Where people of this line lived during the period listed. Comments: Additional information (not always included) Nametag: What you need to actually contact the submitter. Abbreviations used in the migration are listed on this web page: http://helpdesk.rootsweb.com/codes/ OK, so you see a surname listed below and want to share and compare with the person who submitted it. How do you find the submitter? It's not all that bad: to obtain the address info for the submitter whose nametag is "example" (just for example), go here: http://rsl.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/rslsql.cgi?op=user&user=example Reminder: the nametag is the last word on each line in the list below. ===================================== 2 July 2009 Napp 1838 1930 Choctaw. Ala. ,Clarke co. Ms dimanley Napp 1881 1930 Choctaw Ala., Clarke Ms dimanley Nawell 1870 1980 WA.AUST dcarver Nelson 1750 2009 Sweden>Alberta, Canada nancy4g Nelson 1895 2009 PikeCo, MO>USA When she married my grandfather Edward Nelson deborth Nelson New York Penna English-Scotland Cleonie Neufeld 1870 1900 Orenburg, Russia German Mennonite knabx6 Neuhaus 1876 1955 Germany>NE Wilhelm married Maria Seltz gneuwinn Neuheisel WI SD Parkston, SD area Josephine Schumacher Neuheisel richgood Newman 1827 1915 Prussia>WI hapc Nicholas 1800s Galway, IRE > NSW Australia Zechariah Nicholas (3 generations of). kristan Nicholas 1806 1890 CON, ENG to Ballarat, VIC jennyken Nicholas 1806 1890 CON,ENG>SA&VIC,AUS Lived Ballarat jennyken Niedworok <1760> Swierkle,Opole,Poland fran1940 Niedworok <1795> 1875 Horst/Swierkle, Opole,Poland fran1940 Nielsen 1600 2009 Denmark, Australia, USA corelli Nilsson 1750 2009 Sweden>Alberta, Canada nancy4g Nissen 1925 1997 Koenigsberg, East Prussia Looking for birth certificates and death certificates on Rosemarie Nissen, Gustav Nissen and relatives coley522 Noll 1732 1800 DEU>NLD>VA,USA jzero Nordhoff N.German IN-USA 1850's samree Norman 1950 Present Kent, England Little info, name changed? deedb Norris 1890 now LTU>CT not original surname peggysd9 Norrish 1578 1915 Widecombe>Moretonhampstead>Christow,DEV,>LDN,ENG moorejo Noyes 1840? 1950 VT>IA>FL,USA Naaman B Noyes father of Fannie mpline Null 1750 2009 DEU>NLD>VA,USA>WV,USA jzero Nunney 1624 1935 Burford,OXF,ENG moorejo See directions at the top of this message for information on how to retrieve the submitters' contact information.

    07/15/2009 01:17:54
    1. Re: We're Gonna Be Leaving Ya
    2. Lesley Robertson
    3. "Albert Conklin" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected] > Lesley Robertson wrote: >> "John Hill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:1j2okqe.1kkqajsfvcjk0N%[email protected] >> >>> I too use Eternal September (and used its previous incarnation, >>> Motzarella). It does all I need and Ray banana gives excellent support. >>> >>> But it does not host binary newsgroups, and you cannot register using an >>> AT&T e-mail address. This also applies to other domains handled by AT&T >>> mail servers such as Bellsouth, SBCGLOBAL, Prodigy etc. >>> >> The easy solution to that is to open and use a freebie email account such >> as Hotmail. >> I have all my mailing lists on such an account, just to prevent my main >> one getting clogged up with all the Gatewayed stuff. >> Lesley Robertson >> >> > Unfortunately or maybe fortunately, Hotmail is not acceptable to all > other e-mail providers. > Albert We were only discussing problems with AT&T. There's other free email providers. That's why I said "such as Hotmail". However, I can't see how it matters whether one email provider approves of another one. Lesley Robertson

    07/14/2009 07:52:51