Hello Viola, Just a thought - are you sure that it is your Catherine - that was still having children in 1875? At aprox age 67 years - my guess is that your Catherine would not be the one having babies in 1875. We need to remember - that there are other families - perhaps connected - perhaps not - who will carry the Landry - McDougall and other names similar to those in the family line you are researching. This could also be a daughter (unmarried) if the name is the same - who may have had the children in 1875. - Most likly - a completely unrelated Catherine. Perhaps if you start again: Sort out all of the information that you have collected - by yourself - as well as information others have helped you with . Put in a logical order. You may find the information that is eluding you. - or - in the very least - Get you started again - along a solid path - rather than skipping from one area to another. Cheers, Stella At 02:41 PM 12/17/01 -0600, Viola Seward wrote: >Hello listers. All i want for xmas is info on my Marie Landry born ca >1800. Now do not remember if i wrote this in before. So if i did im Not >Sorry!! My Duncan McDougall died Oct/Nov 1818 around Lake Superior. Now >also found a Landry family lived around Lake Superior. Now being Duncan >lived amongst the tribal people for years it seems to me he died amongst >them as well. Supposedly Marie Landry plus her daughter Catherine was >born in BC. Yet i do not believe there were boundary lines in 1800 or >1818. So how can one say born in BC. Unless some one later on in life >said it. But also have another problem with my Catherine. It is stated >born 1818. Yet having children yet in ca 1875!! Now i know stranger >things have happened but isnt this rather old to be bearing children??? >Thank you. >Viola. > > >==== ALBERTA Mailing List ==== >There are several hundred people subscribed to the mailing list >with new subscribers almost daily. Resubmit your queries every few >months in order to reach the largest number of subscribers. >