I was hoping you had proof of a marriage without children for George. There are a lot of mistakes in the descendant tree I posted to MyFamily. Once, I have the 'proved up' data, I'll post an amended descendant tree. There's been information posted that does not hold up when census records, marriage records, etc., are dissected and thoroughly examined as we're trying to do, name by name. sandra Sandra, Thank you for answering my questions about Thomas. I have never seen any documentaion that he was ever in AR. I was just trying to make sure I didn't sleep through class. If it wasn't for BLO land records we would have never known that George went to AR. George didn't stay put long enough to appear on a census there. All of the info I have for George I obtained from BLO, the list, info that Marlene obtained in MS and census records. I will find for the postings naming George's wife and household in KY and take a another look at it. The information stated that he married in Ky ca 1850. Thanks, Liz ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:10 PM Subject: Re: [AILLS] William and Thomas > In a message dated 9/22/2005 9:43:30 PM Central Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > >> Thomas was not included in the info that the gentleman in Johnson Co. >> sent >> you. > > Sorry, I didn't understand that you were asking about Thomas. Thanks for > clarifying that for me. I have no reason to believe that he was in > Arkansas. On > the 1830 census Thomas is found on page 3. He's 20/30 years old. The > female > living in his dwelling is 15/20 years of age. The first child that we > have a > date of birth on is Nicholas Edward Aills and he was born in 1834. I > believe > you've found the same information I have on Nicholas, Thomas' son. > I have the Wills of John and George. > We're looking for additional information on Thomas and George or > proof > that George W was married and to whom. There's lots of questions at the > moment. > I was hoping you had proof of a marriage without children for George. > There > are a lot of mistakes in the descendant tree I posted to MyFamily. Once, > I > have the 'proved up' data, I'll post an amended descendant tree. There's > been > information posted that does not hold up when census records, marriage > records, > etc., are dissected and thoroughly examined as we're trying to do, name by > name. > sandra > > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. > Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx >

There's been information posted that does not hold up when census records, marriage records, etc., are dissected and thoroughly examined as we're trying to do, name by name. sandra Does this mean there is someone in Ky helping look for this info? Liz ----- Original Message ----- From: "Liz Hoopes" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 11:02 PM Subject: Re: [AILLS] William and Thomas >I was hoping you had proof of a marriage without children for George. >There > are a lot of mistakes in the descendant tree I posted to MyFamily. Once, > I > have the 'proved up' data, I'll post an amended descendant tree. There's > been > information posted that does not hold up when census records, marriage > records, > etc., are dissected and thoroughly examined as we're trying to do, name by > name. > sandra > > Sandra, > Thank you for answering my questions about Thomas. I have never seen any > documentaion that he was ever in AR. I was just trying to make sure I > didn't sleep through class. > > If it wasn't for BLO land records we would have never known that George > went to AR. George didn't stay put long enough to appear on a census > there. > > All of the info I have for George I obtained from BLO, the list, info that > Marlene obtained in MS and census records. I will find for the postings > naming George's wife and household in KY and take a another look at it. > The information stated that he married in Ky ca 1850. > Thanks, > Liz > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:10 PM > Subject: Re: [AILLS] William and Thomas > > >> In a message dated 9/22/2005 9:43:30 PM Central Standard Time, >> [email protected] writes: >> >> >>> Thomas was not included in the info that the gentleman in Johnson Co. >>> sent >>> you. >> >> Sorry, I didn't understand that you were asking about Thomas. Thanks for >> clarifying that for me. I have no reason to believe that he was in >> Arkansas. On >> the 1830 census Thomas is found on page 3. He's 20/30 years old. The >> female >> living in his dwelling is 15/20 years of age. The first child that we >> have a >> date of birth on is Nicholas Edward Aills and he was born in 1834. I >> believe >> you've found the same information I have on Nicholas, Thomas' son. >> I have the Wills of John and George. >> We're looking for additional information on Thomas and George or >> proof >> that George W was married and to whom. There's lots of questions at the >> moment. >> I was hoping you had proof of a marriage without children for George. >> There >> are a lot of mistakes in the descendant tree I posted to MyFamily. Once, >> I >> have the 'proved up' data, I'll post an amended descendant tree. There's >> been >> information posted that does not hold up when census records, marriage >> records, >> etc., are dissected and thoroughly examined as we're trying to do, name >> by >> name. >> sandra >> >> >> ============================== >> Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the >> areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. >> Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx >> > > > ============================== > Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for > ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx >