Jinny, I sent the obit to Sandra....Lee Jackson McCorkle was the youngest child of James and Sarah Aills McCorkle....He was brother of my ancestor James McCorkle, JR...... Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: "peters jinny" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 10:27 AM Subject: Re: [AILLS] Fw: Hey there > Hi Liz, Hopes this finds you all well. I am a litle under the weather, a virus, not to bad, feel better to day. A few days ago I asked for help on Lee J. McCorkle. Who did he belong to? I obtained his Obit from Sandras' file cabinet, but I don't know where to put it. He was 65 when he died. Jinny > > Pam if you see this do you know who and where Lee J. McCorkle is in our family tree, Also, anyone else that may have some info. He was 65 when he died. Jinny > > Liz Hoopes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Jinny, > I hope this will help you. In the 1850 federal census Boone Twnship, Hendricks Co IN. I found Nicholas 14 yrs old. Household as follows: Edward Doyle 36 born in KY Sarah 30 born in Ky John 2 born in Indiana Nicholas Ayles 14 born in KY. > I found him in the 1860 and 1870 census with his wife Mary and children that Sandra listed. It is funny that in every census his last name is spelled differently. Ailes/Ayles/Aills It is evidently the same person dates match on all 3. > Liz > > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > > JESUS LOVES YOU > > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx >

Hi Liz, Hopes this finds you all well. I am a litle under the weather, a virus, not to bad, feel better to day. A few days ago I asked for help on Lee J. McCorkle. Who did he belong to? I obtained his Obit from Sandras' file cabinet, but I don't know where to put it. He was 65 when he died. Jinny Pam if you see this do you know who and where Lee J. McCorkle is in our family tree, Also, anyone else that may have some info. He was 65 when he died. Jinny Liz Hoopes <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Jinny, I hope this will help you. In the 1850 federal census Boone Twnship, Hendricks Co IN. I found Nicholas 14 yrs old. Household as follows: Edward Doyle 36 born in KY Sarah 30 born in Ky John 2 born in Indiana Nicholas Ayles 14 born in KY. I found him in the 1860 and 1870 census with his wife Mary and children that Sandra listed. It is funny that in every census his last name is spelled differently. Ailes/Ayles/Aills It is evidently the same person dates match on all 3. Liz ============================== Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx JESUS LOVES YOU

In a message dated 9/15/2005 7:57:22 AM Central Standard Time, [email protected] writes: > Good Morning San, and thank you for the info on Nicholas Aills and yes I > would like the info on the rest of the children of William E. Reed and Nancy > Dyal, and anything else you think I might need. Have a great day. Jinny > Hi Jinny I've created a PDF file on what I have on Doyle and will be sending it to you. I can't attach it and send on this Rootsweb list. Please let me know if you're able to open it. I could upload it to the MyFamily site if you can't open it. You'll see (1840LewisCo) or other such notes. That's the way I know that I've found census information without having to open the sources on each name. It's more convenient for me and I don't want it to confuse you. It is not where people were born. Thanks and you have a good day too, Sandra

Hi Jinny, Since you asked where Nicholas Aills fits in, I can tell you. He was the son of Thomas Aills and L Ann Dyal, according to information that has been provided by a Doyle researcher and was passed on to me. The Doyle researcher has Thomas' wife as Nancy Ann Dyal, the daughter of John A Dyal/Doyle and Christina Davis. He lists the children of Thomas and Nancy as Allice (Alea) Aills; Nicholas Edward Aills; Ruhanna Aills and an unknown son. In a prior post I said Arrine (Alea) Aills. Since that post I've been told that Allice is the correct spelling. Thomas and Nancy, his wife were evidently deceased by 1850 and the children were split up between Nancy's siblings. Nicholas Edward Aills, with various spelling of his name, was found in the home of Edward T. Doyle, Nancy L Ann Dyal's brother. Ruhanna was found in the home of Rebecca Doyle Reed, wife of William E. Reed. Rebecca was Nancy L Ann Dyal's sister. The child Allice (Alea) Aills or Arrine has not been found in census records. We're looking. If you need more information, let me know. I have dates and move information on the other siblings of Nancy L Ann Dyal if you want it. Thanks, Sandra

Good Morning San, and thank you for the info on Nicholas Aills and yes I would like the info on the rest of the children of William E. Reed and Nancy Dyal, and anything else you think I might need. Have a great day. Jinny [email protected] wrote:Hi Jinny, Since you asked where Nicholas Aills fits in, I can tell you. He was the son of Thomas Aills and L Ann Dyal, according to information that has been provided by a Doyle researcher and was passed on to me. The Doyle researcher has Thomas' wife as Nancy Ann Dyal, the daughter of John A Dyal/Doyle and Christina Davis. He lists the children of Thomas and Nancy as Allice (Alea) Aills; Nicholas Edward Aills; Ruhanna Aills and an unknown son. In a prior post I said Arrine (Alea) Aills. Since that post I've been told that Allice is the correct spelling. Thomas and Nancy, his wife were evidently deceased by 1850 and the children were split up between Nancy's siblings. Nicholas Edward Aills, with various spelling of his name, was found in the home of Edward T. Doyle, Nancy L Ann Dyal's brother. Ruhanna was found in the home of Rebecca Doyle Reed, wife of William E. Reed. Rebecca was Nancy L Ann Dyal's sister. The child Allice (Alea) Aills or Arrine has not been found in census records. We're looking. If you need more information, let me know. I have dates and move information on the other siblings of Nancy L Ann Dyal if you want it. Thanks, Sandra ============================== Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx JESUS LOVES YOU

Enough is enough, and I will hold you to those closing remarks. Marlene

In a message dated 9/14/2005 8:25:11 PM Central Standard Time, [email protected] writes: > I was concerned about the possibility of > this becoming a pick and choose situation Marlene, I don't intend to make this a pick and choose situation. I have never moderated anyone or unsubscribed anyone. I don't have a problem with actual research being posted and/or shared with others either. I have had no control over what anyone has or has not posted to the list and I have had no personal contact with Rhonda for several months other than to send a joke to her once in a while. I had no more control over what she posted than what others posted in the past few days. I don't intend to start moderating this list and I hope this is the end of the subject unless it's done in private email. I think the statement enough is enough, is really enough. I appreciate your interest and your concern. Thanks, Sandra

Thank you for your explanation. I was concerned about the possibility of this becoming a pick and choose situation. I strongly disagree with e-mail that relates to actual research being censored by anyone. On the other hand, I would hope if you have that kind of control you will not allow another letter like the one Rhonda sent to go through the list. Marlene

In a message dated 9/14/2005 6:00:15 PM Central Standard Time, [email protected] writes: > Please explain just how you plan to moderate the list, if in > fact that becomes necessary. > Hi Marlene, As a list owner there are various tools available that I hope never have to be used. I think we're too much family to resort to moderation. Moderation is a tool where the posts of one or more persons or the posts of the entire list are received by the list owner and the list owner passes on the posts that are chosen to be passed on. Many lists have a whole lists of rules and if those rules are broken then the list owner can monitor or moderate the posts. Some are terribly strict and it's up to the person who sets up the list. Here's exactly what it say in the listowner tools on Rootsweb: "Set to moderated/restricted posting? If the list is moderated, then only people on the accept list will be permitted to post. Mail from other people will bounce to you, the administrator, and it will say {not a subscriber} even if they are subscribers. This can be an effective way to deal with a list in crisis. It would be expected that this setting would be used sparingly and only for limited periods. I think everything has been said through this crisis and it has been aired out and we can move on. I don't intend to moderate the list because I don't think it will be necessary. What usually causes moderation are "flame wars." This one hasn't turned into a flame war, it's just a family argument with two sides strongly voicing their opinions and I consider it to be over. Thanks, Sandra

Sandra, I just read your mail concerning your decision not to leave the list. However, I have a question. Exactly what do you mean by moderating the list? I thought perhaps there is a definition of this word that I don't know, so I looked the work up in the dictionary to see if I could fit it in the context of your sentence. Please explain just how you plan to moderate the list, if in fact that becomes necessary. Marlene

We are adults and it should not be "fun to mess with Sandra" like little girls in middle school......... Maybe you and Rhonda should keep that in mind from now on. You are right we are adults.... I sent this to the list this morning because I wanted you to see that People who can find accurate info and want to help others won't use the list because they are tired of getting their hands slapped . That is so sad and unfair to us all. .... You are not the only one with feelings. Being dogged via of the list is not fun is it ? I hated stooping down to your level to prove a point but you are so hard headed. What you guys did to Pam and the way you treated Tarney was awful. You have made many of us feel like not ever posting to the list several times. But we kept on going because of the others that we have grown so fond of. I totally agree with Roberta's suggestion. She has more sense than most us.... But does that apply to you too? You are right about needing a little time for tempers to calm down. I just hope that we never see someone getting beaten up via the list anymore. And when you apologize to some Please don't say I'm sorry but............That only adds insult to injury. If it's not sincere then don't bother. . I am by nature a pretty low key person, I don't get fired up often . It requires too much energy. I have learned over the years "not to sweat the small stuff save it for the big stuff. Watching people being treated badly on this list over and over again became big stuff...... I apologize to every one on the list for loosing my temper. Liz ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:33 PM Subject: Re: [AILLS] I'll leave - on second thought > Everyone, > After having received emails from others who are as interested in finding > and > posting accurate information, and asking me to not give up something I > started, I am withdrawing my offer for someone to take over the list that > I posted > in haste. I will continue to be the list owner of this list I created. > I do not want this list to be placed on moderated status and I do not > want to place individuals on moderated status. > We are adults and it should not be "fun to mess with Sandra" like little > girls in middle school. > Now, shall we get down to doing genealogy as accurately as possible? > I > believe the recommendation for a solution and a "general rule of thumb" > that > Roberta posted to add "Speculation, no hard copy proof, as yet" is good > genealogy practice. > If you want to be unsubscribed from the list, you know how to do it. > You are welcome to continue as a member, I'm not going to unsubscribe > anyone. I > think being moderated is a better choice until tempers have calmed down. > I > will exercise that choice as list owner if it becomes necessary. > My apologies to you who have witnessed this cat scratching and my > thank > you to those who have asked me not to give up something I started and that > has > been worthwhile to all of us. > Sandra > > > > ============================== > Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. > Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx >

Everyone, After having received emails from others who are as interested in finding and posting accurate information, and asking me to not give up something I started, I am withdrawing my offer for someone to take over the list that I posted in haste. I will continue to be the list owner of this list I created. I do not want this list to be placed on moderated status and I do not want to place individuals on moderated status. We are adults and it should not be "fun to mess with Sandra" like little girls in middle school. Now, shall we get down to doing genealogy as accurately as possible? I believe the recommendation for a solution and a "general rule of thumb" that Roberta posted to add "Speculation, no hard copy proof, as yet" is good genealogy practice. If you want to be unsubscribed from the list, you know how to do it. You are welcome to continue as a member, I'm not going to unsubscribe anyone. I think being moderated is a better choice until tempers have calmed down. I will exercise that choice as list owner if it becomes necessary. My apologies to you who have witnessed this cat scratching and my thank you to those who have asked me not to give up something I started and that has been worthwhile to all of us. Sandra

Thank you Sandra you hang in their Billy Sinor ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:33 PM Subject: Re: [AILLS] I'll leave - on second thought > Everyone, > After having received emails from others who are as interested in finding > and > posting accurate information, and asking me to not give up something I > started, I am withdrawing my offer for someone to take over the list that > I posted > in haste. I will continue to be the list owner of this list I created. > I do not want this list to be placed on moderated status and I do not > want to place individuals on moderated status. > We are adults and it should not be "fun to mess with Sandra" like little > girls in middle school. > Now, shall we get down to doing genealogy as accurately as possible? > I > believe the recommendation for a solution and a "general rule of thumb" > that > Roberta posted to add "Speculation, no hard copy proof, as yet" is good > genealogy practice. > If you want to be unsubscribed from the list, you know how to do it. > You are welcome to continue as a member, I'm not going to unsubscribe > anyone. I > think being moderated is a better choice until tempers have calmed down. > I > will exercise that choice as list owner if it becomes necessary. > My apologies to you who have witnessed this cat scratching and my > thank > you to those who have asked me not to give up something I started and that > has > been worthwhile to all of us. > Sandra > > > > ============================== > Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. > Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.21/96 - Release Date: 9/10/2005 > >

Hang in there guys,remember we all came from the Aills Stock and hey, we are tough hombres, right, Jinny Billy Sinor <[email protected]> wrote:Thank you Sandra you hang in their Billy Sinor ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:33 PM Subject: Re: [AILLS] I'll leave - on second thought > Everyone, > After having received emails from others who are as interested in finding > and > posting accurate information, and asking me to not give up something I > started, I am withdrawing my offer for someone to take over the list that > I posted > in haste. I will continue to be the list owner of this list I created. > I do not want this list to be placed on moderated status and I do not > want to place individuals on moderated status. > We are adults and it should not be "fun to mess with Sandra" like little > girls in middle school. > Now, shall we get down to doing genealogy as accurately as possible? > I > believe the recommendation for a solution and a "general rule of thumb" > that > Roberta posted to add "Speculation, no hard copy proof, as yet" is good > genealogy practice. > If you want to be unsubscribed from the list, you know how to do it. > You are welcome to continue as a member, I'm not going to unsubscribe > anyone. I > think being moderated is a better choice until tempers have calmed down. > I > will exercise that choice as list owner if it becomes necessary. > My apologies to you who have witnessed this cat scratching and my > thank > you to those who have asked me not to give up something I started and that > has > been worthwhile to all of us. > Sandra > > > > ============================== > Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. > Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.21/96 - Release Date: 9/10/2005 > > ============================== View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find marriage announcements and more. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx JESUS LOVES YOU

I would be more than happy to adopt the list. Some of us feel like if you cannot play nice then you need to take your marbles and go home. You don't like to be described as a bully ....... then stop being one. There have been several occasions that you have just been down right nasty to some of our researchers. Including me..... You wouldn't know diddly-squat if it wasn't for us digging through courthouses,libraries, archives, ordering documents etc. How many times have you gotten off of your hiney and braved rattlesnakes, chiggers, slapping mosquitoes as big as blackhawk helicopters canvassing cemeteries to find any info ??? Most of what you know has been fed to you by people who truly love the smell of decaying paper and the thrill of the hunt. You talk about how hard you work well.... welcome to our world....... Some of us work very hard but we don't whine about it.... We enjoy it...... that is the way it should be. I would never make anyone feel like their work was junk or chastise someone for taking advantage of the right of free speech. Lighten up................ The internet is a wonderful tool. Getting info out there is how we keep learning and gathering information. You take what you can use and leave the rest. This is not rocket science and not all info that we get will be accurate. We all do the best that we can and take pride in our work to share with others. As you so eloquently put it yesterday.... Now, the Aills list is up for adoption. Let me know who wants to take > over and I'll transfer your name to Rootsweb. I hope the guessing will > end > for the good of other people who don't know better than to believe that > they > find the name of husband just because there was a child by that name. > By any other name, it's still junk being posted as fact. > Good luck in your digging and searching. > Take care, > Sandra You obviously have no respect for any of us.... you have made that very clear many,many times. I refuse to see you run off any more reseachers including myself. I am not the only one that feels this way. Good luck to you in your digging and researching. Take care, Liz P.S. I would bet that this is not the first time you have been asked to leave a list............. ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 2:48 PM Subject: [AILLS] I'll leave > I'll tell you what,,,,,,,, I'll leave. I don't want to be described as a > bully because I object to someone adding a husband because of the name of > a > child. I don't want to see parents of Walker and William and many > generations for > the mother, Mary Burton just because it looks good and it MIGHT fit. That > is > junk genealogy to deliberately mislead someone searching for information. > The only place Eugenia Melissa Aills appears on Ancestry.com or > WorldConnect was found because she was my greatgrandmother and I shared > the > information on this site, and of course it was sourced as personal > research. > None of us have perfect information but we search for sources and > for > records that support possibilities, we don't just post something because > it's > a guess or will lead to contacts from someone who wants to dispute the > information. The misinformation might someday be deleted, it might not > be, but who > copied it as fact and will look back to see if it was changed or > corrected? > The inaccuracy will be repeated because it was found on the web. And we're > supposed to accept SO WHAT? > I work too hard and I've worked too long to be as accurate as I > possibly can be and to provide as much information as I can find to share > with this > list. If it's all right with you and you defend guesses that are given as > fact, and I'm accused of being a bully then you can decide who you want to > take > over this list. > You know my email address and if you want to continue to be made > aware > of something I find then you can email me and I gladly add your name to my > private list of researchers who work to find, share and provide accurate > information. > Now, the Aills list is up for adoption. Let me know who wants to > take > over and I'll transfer your name to Rootsweb. I hope the guessing will > end > for the good of other people who don't know better than to believe that > they > find the name of husband just because there was a child by that name. > By any other name, it's still junk being posted as fact. > Good luck in your digging and searching. > Take care, > Sandra > > > > ============================== > New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your ancestors > at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. Learn more: > http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=14599&targetid=5429 >

I stand behind everything Liz has said, this should be fun & exciting, not the way it is now. Liz you have my total support I will do everything I can to help you in any way. Thank you Pam ----- Original Message ----- From: Liz Hoopes<mailto:[email protected]> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 12:08 PM Subject: Re: [AILLS] I'll leave I would be more than happy to adopt the list. Some of us feel like if you cannot play nice then you need to take your marbles and go home. You don't like to be described as a bully ....... then stop being one. There have been several occasions that you have just been down right nasty to some of our researchers. Including me..... You wouldn't know diddly-squat if it wasn't for us digging through courthouses,libraries, archives, ordering documents etc. How many times have you gotten off of your hiney and braved rattlesnakes, chiggers, slapping mosquitoes as big as blackhawk helicopters canvassing cemeteries to find any info ??? Most of what you know has been fed to you by people who truly love the smell of decaying paper and the thrill of the hunt. You talk about how hard you work well.... welcome to our world....... Some of us work very hard but we don't whine about it.... We enjoy it...... that is the way it should be. I would never make anyone feel like their work was junk or chastise someone for taking advantage of the right of free speech. Lighten up................ The internet is a wonderful tool. Getting info out there is how we keep learning and gathering information. You take what you can use and leave the rest. This is not rocket science and not all info that we get will be accurate. We all do the best that we can and take pride in our work to share with others. As you so eloquently put it yesterday.... Now, the Aills list is up for adoption. Let me know who wants to take > over and I'll transfer your name to Rootsweb. I hope the guessing will > end > for the good of other people who don't know better than to believe that > they > find the name of husband just because there was a child by that name. > By any other name, it's still junk being posted as fact. > Good luck in your digging and searching. > Take care, > Sandra You obviously have no respect for any of us.... you have made that very clear many,many times. I refuse to see you run off any more reseachers including myself. I am not the only one that feels this way. Good luck to you in your digging and researching. Take care, Liz P.S. I would bet that this is not the first time you have been asked to leave a list............. ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 2:48 PM Subject: [AILLS] I'll leave > I'll tell you what,,,,,,,, I'll leave. I don't want to be described as a > bully because I object to someone adding a husband because of the name of > a > child. I don't want to see parents of Walker and William and many > generations for > the mother, Mary Burton just because it looks good and it MIGHT fit. That > is > junk genealogy to deliberately mislead someone searching for information. > The only place Eugenia Melissa Aills appears on Ancestry.com or > WorldConnect was found because she was my greatgrandmother and I shared > the > information on this site, and of course it was sourced as personal > research. > None of us have perfect information but we search for sources and > for > records that support possibilities, we don't just post something because > it's > a guess or will lead to contacts from someone who wants to dispute the > information. The misinformation might someday be deleted, it might not > be, but who > copied it as fact and will look back to see if it was changed or > corrected? > The inaccuracy will be repeated because it was found on the web. And we're > supposed to accept SO WHAT? > I work too hard and I've worked too long to be as accurate as I > possibly can be and to provide as much information as I can find to share > with this > list. If it's all right with you and you defend guesses that are given as > fact, and I'm accused of being a bully then you can decide who you want to > take > over this list. > You know my email address and if you want to continue to be made > aware > of something I find then you can email me and I gladly add your name to my > private list of researchers who work to find, share and provide accurate > information. > Now, the Aills list is up for adoption. Let me know who wants to > take > over and I'll transfer your name to Rootsweb. I hope the guessing will > end > for the good of other people who don't know better than to believe that > they > find the name of husband just because there was a child by that name. > By any other name, it's still junk being posted as fact. > Good luck in your digging and searching. > Take care, > Sandra > > > > ============================== > New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your ancestors > at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. Learn more: > http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=14599&targetid=5429<http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=14599&targetid=5429> > ============================== Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx<http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx>

I could not resist...... I am not sure how he fits in. I believe he must belong to Jinny. I will ask her. Did you send it to Jinny on her e-mail??? I did then I thought that messing with Sandra may be more fun........ Shame on me....... Liz ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pam Miller" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 10:25 AM Subject: Re: [AILLS] Fw: Hey there > Too funny, I gave her the same thing this morning, great minds think > alike... > > Do we know how Nicholas Ailes fits in?? > > Pam > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Liz Hoopes<mailto:[email protected]> > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 9:23 AM > Subject: [AILLS] Fw: Hey there > > > > > Hi Jinny, > I hope this will help you. In the 1850 federal census Boone Twnship, > Hendricks Co IN. I found Nicholas 14 yrs old. Household as follows: > Edward Doyle 36 born in KY Sarah 30 born in Ky John 2 born in Indiana > Nicholas Ayles 14 born in KY. > I found him in the 1860 and 1870 census with his wife Mary and children > that Sandra listed. It is funny that in every census his last name is > spelled differently. Ailes/Ayles/Aills It is evidently the same person > dates match on all 3. > Liz > > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx<http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx> > > > > ============================== > New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your ancestors > at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. Learn more: > http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=14599&targetid=5429 >

Hi Jinny, I hope this will help you. In the 1850 federal census Boone Twnship, Hendricks Co IN. I found Nicholas 14 yrs old. Household as follows: Edward Doyle 36 born in KY Sarah 30 born in Ky John 2 born in Indiana Nicholas Ayles 14 born in KY. I found him in the 1860 and 1870 census with his wife Mary and children that Sandra listed. It is funny that in every census his last name is spelled differently. Ailes/Ayles/Aills It is evidently the same person dates match on all 3. Liz

Too funny, I gave her the same thing this morning, great minds think alike... Do we know how Nicholas Ailes fits in?? Pam ----- Original Message ----- From: Liz Hoopes<mailto:[email protected]> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 9:23 AM Subject: [AILLS] Fw: Hey there Hi Jinny, I hope this will help you. In the 1850 federal census Boone Twnship, Hendricks Co IN. I found Nicholas 14 yrs old. Household as follows: Edward Doyle 36 born in KY Sarah 30 born in Ky John 2 born in Indiana Nicholas Ayles 14 born in KY. I found him in the 1860 and 1870 census with his wife Mary and children that Sandra listed. It is funny that in every census his last name is spelled differently. Ailes/Ayles/Aills It is evidently the same person dates match on all 3. Liz ============================== Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx<http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx>

Enough is enough. We have all learned a great deal from the Aills group. I have not contributed as much as some of you have but I have contributed to the KY Aills. If there has not been a general rule of thumb, let's start one. If you are not certain of the info you are stating, just add "Speculation, no hard copy proof, as yet". I just could not stand by any longer and say nothing. Roberta