This question is really outside of the purview of the Acadian list -- hope no one minds. My recent posts about the alleged Native ancestry of the Morvant family of Louisiana spurred an email out of the blue to me from a distant cousin, who made the statement, "did you know that another line in our ancestry has Native blood." He further stated that Magdelaine Baptiste, wife of (1) Francois Sancie or Sensie (or Saucier or any number of other spellings) and (2) Jean-Baptiste Montpierre, was Native. I asked him what his proof was. He didn't have proof, but stated as evidence that (1) Magdelaine and Francois' children were all born in the Arkansas Post, in what was at that time wilderness occupied by a few French and a lot of Natives, and that (2) she doesn't have a "real French surname" -- that Baptiste was a name adopted by Natives and (following the Civil War) freed slaves. First, and primarily so I don't get blasted for posting this :-) let me say that I don't consider this proof of any sort. However, he did have an interesting point, and it was something I hadn't considered. Francois Sancie (or however his name is spelled) came over single; and I would expect that there _were_ very few single women in that area of Louisiana at that point (the early 1730s) except for the Natives. And I will admit that Baptiste is an unusual surname. So, OK, considering his hypothesis on its merits, let me ask wiser heads than my own: is Baptiste a "real" French surname, or is it (as my cousin suggests) an adopted name only? Are there records which might help prove (or more likely, disprove) this theory? I can't help but think that my Morvant posts have opened up a can of worms -- I guess a lot of people would like to have Native ancestry. Me, I just want the truth... Any advice? cheers, Gordon Bonnet Trumansburg NY