On 25/01/2014 09:54, B&A Smith wrote: > This name doesn't seem to appear in the OS name books (mid 19th C), so it's > precise situation is difficult to pinpoint. The authors of "The Placenames of Upper Deeside" give it as 405978 (which presumably means NO 405978). Their authority for this is a little unclear, but they took their information from published and archival sources, as well as from living informants. Gavin Bell

Thanks for this, at least I now know the general location. Sharon On 25/01/2014 09:54, B&A Smith wrote: > This name doesn't seem to appear in the OS name books (mid 19th C), so > it's precise situation is difficult to pinpoint. The authors of "The Placenames of Upper Deeside" give it as 405978 (which presumably means NO 405978). Their authority for this is a little unclear, but they took their information from published and archival sources, as well as from living informants. Gavin Bell ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message